A popular view of what Artificial Intelligence can do for lawyers is that it can do no more than deduce the consequences from a precisely stated set of facts and legal rules. This immediately makes many lawyers sceptical about the usefulness of such systems: this mechanical approach seems to leave out most of what is important in legal reasoning. A case does not appear as a set of facts, but rather as a story told by a client. For example, a man may come to his lawyer saying that he had developed an innovative product while working for Company A. Now Company B has made him an offer of a job, to develop a similar product for them. Can he do this? The lawyer firstly must interpret this story, in the context, so that it can be made to fit the framework of applicable law. Several interpretations may be possible. In our example it could be seen as being governed by his contract of employment, or as an issue in Trade Secrets law.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
V. Aleven. Teaching Case-Based Argumentation Through a Model and Examples. PhD Dissertation University of Pittsburgh, 1997.
K. Ashley. Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
T. Bench-Capon. Representation of case law as an argumentation framework. In Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2002: The Fifteenth Annual Conference, pages 53–62, Amsterdam etc, 2002. IOS Press.
T. Bench-Capon, K. Atkinson, and A. Chorley. Persuasion and value in legal argument. Journal of Logic and Computation, 15:1075–1097, 2005.
T. Bench-Capon, T. Geldard, and P. Leng. A method for the computational modelling of dialectical argument with dialogue games. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 8:233–254, 2000.
T. Bench-Capon and H. Prakken. Argumentation. In A. Lodder and A. Oskamp, editors, Information Technology and Lawyers: Advanced technology in the legal domain, from challenges to daily routine, pages 61–80. Springer, Berlin, 2006.
T. Bench-Capon and G. Sartor. A quantitative approach to theory coherence. In B. V. et al., editor, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2001: The Fourteenth Annual Conference, pages 53–62, Amsterdam etc, 2001. IOS Press.
Bench-Capon and G. Sartor. A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values. Artificial Intelligence, 150:97–143, 2003.
T. Bench-Capon and G. Staniford. PLAID - proactive legal assistance. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 81–88, New York, 1995. ACM Press.
D. Berman and C. Hafner. Representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning: the missing link. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 50–59, New York, 1993. ACM Press.
F. Bex, S. v. d. Braak, H. v. Oostendorp, H. Prakken, B. Verheij, and G. Vreeswijk. Sense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments? Law, Probability and Risk, 6:145–168, 2007.
F. Bex, H. Prakken, C. Reed, and D. Walton. Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 12:125–165, 2003.
L. Branting. Reasoning with Rules and Precedents: A Computational Model of Legal Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1999.
P. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n–person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77:321–357, 1995.
A. Gardner. Artificial Intelligence Approach to Legal Reasoning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.
T. Gordon. An abductive theory of legal issues. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 35:95–118, 1991.
T. Gordon. The Pleadings Game. An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1995.
T. Gordon, H. Prakken, and D. Walton. The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificial Intelligence, 171:875–896, 2007.
J. Hage. A theory of legal reasoning and a logic to match. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4:199–273, 1996.
J. Hage. Formalizing legal coherence. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 22–31, New York, 2001. ACM Press.
R. Kowalski and F. Toni. Abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4:275–296, 1996.
A. Lodder. DiaLaw. On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1999.
R. Loui and J. Norman. Rationales and argument moves. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 3:159–189, 1995.
R. Loui, J. Norman, J. Alpeter, D. Pinkard, D. Craven, J. Linsday, and M. Foltz. Progress on Room 5: A testbed for public interactive semi-formal legal argumentation. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 207–214, New York, 1997. ACM Press.
L. McCarty. Reflections on TAXMAN: An experiment in artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Harvard Law Review, 90:89–116, 1977.
L. McCarty. An implementation of Eisner v. Macomber. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 276–286, New York, 1995. ACM Press.
L. McCarty and N. Sridharan. The representation of an evolving system of legal concepts: II. Prototypes and deformations. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 246–253, 1981.
L. Mommers. Applied Legal Epistemology. Doctoral dissertation Leiden University, 2002.
A. Peczenik. Jumps and logic in the law. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4:297–329, 1996.
H. Prakken. A logical framework for modelling legal argument. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 1–9, New York, 1993. ACM Press.
H. Prakken. Modelling defeasibility in law: logic or procedure? Fundamenta Informaticae, 48:253–271, 2001.
H. Prakken. An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 10:113–133, 2002.
H. Prakken. A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 85–94, New York, 2005. ACM Press.
H. Prakken. A formal model of adjudication dialogues. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 16, 2008. to appear.
H. Prakken and G. Sartor. A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4:331–368, 1996.
H. Prakken and G. Sartor. Formalising arguments about the burden of persuasion. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 97–106, New York, 2007. ACM Press.
H. Prakken and G. Sartor. More on presumptions and burdens of proof. In G. Sartor, editor, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2008: The Twentyfirst Annual Conference. IOS Press, Amsterdam etc., 2008.
C. Reed and G. Rowe. Araucaria: Software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. International Journal of AI Tools, 13:961–980, 2004.
C. Reed, D. Walton, and F. Macagno. Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 22:87–109, 2007.
R. Riveret, H. Prakken, A. Rotolo, and G. Sartor. Heuristics in argumentation: a game-theoretical investigation. In P. Besnard, S. Doutre, and A. Hunter, editors, Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2008, pages 324–335, Amsterdam etc, 2008. IOS Press.
R. Riveret, A. Rotolo, G. Sartor, H. Prakken, and B. Roth. Success chances in argument games: a probabilistic approach to legal disputes. In A. Lodder and L. Mommers, editors, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference, pages 99–108. IOS Press, Amsterdam etc., 2007.
D. Schum and P. Tillers. Marshaling evidence for adversary litigation. Cardozo Law Review, 13:657–704, 1991.
D. Skalak and E. Rissland. Arguments and cases. an inevitable intertwining. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1:3–44, 1992.
S. Toulmin. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1958.
B. Verheij. Rules, reasons, arguments: formal studies of argumentation and defeat. Doctoral dissertation University of Maastricht, 1996.
B. Verheij. Automated argument assistance for lawyers. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 43–52, New York, 1999. ACM Press.
D. Walton. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1996.
D. Walton and E. Krabbe. Commitment in Dialogue. Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1995.
J. Wigmore. The Principles of Judicial Proof. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 2nd edition, 1931.
A. Wyner and T. Bench-Capon. Argument schemes for legal case-based reasoning. In A. Lodder and L. Mommers, editors, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference, pages 139–149. IOS Press, Amsterdam etc., 2007.
A. Wyner, T. Bench-Capon, and K. Atkinson. Arguments, values and baseballs: Representation of Popov v. Hayashi. In A. Lodder and L. Mommers, editors, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference, pages 151–160. IOS Press, Amsterdam etc., 2007.
J. Zeleznikow and A. Stranieri. The split-up system. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 185–195, New York, 1995. ACM Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag US
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bench-Capon, T., Prakken, H., Sartor, G. (2009). Argumentation in Legal Reasoning. In: Simari, G., Rahwan, I. (eds) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98196-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-98197-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)