Skip to main content

Green Transportation Strategies and Impact Evaluation Using System Dynamic Modeling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Improving Complex Systems Today

Abstract

Owing to fierce global warming, carbon reduction and energy saving have become the common responsibility of the international community. According to the statistical report in 2006 by International Energy Agency (IEA), many developed and developing countries, with manufacturing based economy, generate much higher carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions comparing to the other regions. The IEA reported statistical information reveals that there is much to be improved in reducing CO2 emissions in the industrial countries. Thereafter, Taiwan government also passed the Sustainable Energy Policy on World Environment Day in 2008 and committed to improve energy efficiency, develop clean energy, and ensure stable energy supply. Specifically, Taiwan has planned 10 benchmarking programs with 35 sub-projects in 2009 and announced that 2010 is the year of energy saving and carbon reduction. The objective of this paper is to develop a cost-benefit evaluation methodology to guide low carbon policy development. First, we use the input-output analysis and location quotient methods from top to bottom level to effectively assess the organization’s carbon footprint in a given region. In our in-depth case study, we apply the methods to Taiwan’s Penghu County’s (Taiwan’s largest island) low carbon island development project. Based on the assessment of carbon emissions in the given region, this research applies system dynamics (SD) approach to construct the mathematical model showing the causal feedback relationships for the island’s green transportation development. The causal feedback loop diagram is defined and used to analyze the effectiveness of required investment cost and the corresponding benefits for carbon reduction via green transportation strategy. Finally, the SD model is constructed and the policy scenarios are simulated to evaluate the time-varying impacts of proposed green transportation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acquaye AA, Duffy AP. Input–output analysis of Irish construction sector greenhouse gas emissions. Building and Environment, 2010; 45(3): 784–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alcántara V, Padilla E. Input–output subsystems and pollution: an application to the service sector and CO2 emissions in Spain. Ecological Economics 2009, 68(3): 905–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carbon Trust. Available at: <http://www.carbontrust.co.uk/cut-carbon-reduce-costs/calculate/carbon-footprinting/pages/carbon-footprinting.aspx>. Accessed on: Nov. 29th 2010

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chang Y, Ries RJ, Wang Y. The embodied energy and environmental emissions of construction projects in china: An economic input-output LCA model. Journal of Energy Policy, 2010; 38(11): 6597–6603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen F, Duic N, Alves LM, Carvalho MG. Renewislands: Renewable energy solutions for islands. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2007; 11(8): 1888–1902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Forrester JW. Principles of System. In: MA: MIT Press, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  7. Han J, Hayashi Y. A system dynamics model of CO2 mitigation in China’s inter-city passenger transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2008; 13(5): 298–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang YA, Weber CL, Matthews HS. Categorization of Scope 3 Emissions for Streamlined Enterprise Carbon Footprinting. Environmental science & Technology 2009, 43(22): 8509–8515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. IPCC. Available at: <http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/index.htm.> Accessed on: Sep. 20th 2010

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jin W, Xu L, Yang Z. Modeling a policy making framework for urban sustainability: Incorporating system dynamics into the ecological footprint. Ecological Economics, 2009; 68(12): 2938–2949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu HY, Wu SD. An assessment on the planning and construction of an island renewable energy system: A case study of Kinmen Island. Renewable Energy, 2010; 35(12):2723–2731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ju L, Chen B. An input-output model to analyze sector linkages and CO2 emissions. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2010; 2: 1841–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Machado D, Schaeffer R, Worrell E. Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: An input-output approach. Ecological Economics, 2001; 39(3): 409-424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller RE, Blair PD. Input–Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. In: New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Phdungsilp A. Integrated energy and carbon modelling with adecision support system: Policy scenarios for low-carbon city development in Bangkok. Energy Policy, 2010; 38: 4808-4817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Samso energy academy: Renewable energy Denmark. Available at: <http://www.onlinepdf.dk/Books/onlinepdf.aspx?onlinepdf=24054>. Accessed on: Nov. 21th 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilbert Y. P. Lin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Trappey, A.J.C., Lin, G.Y.P., Ou, J.J.R., Hsiao, CT., Chen, K.W.P. (2011). Green Transportation Strategies and Impact Evaluation Using System Dynamic Modeling. In: Frey, D., Fukuda, S., Rock, G. (eds) Improving Complex Systems Today. Advanced Concurrent Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-799-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-799-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-798-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-799-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics