Abstract
Owing to fierce global warming, carbon reduction and energy saving have become the common responsibility of the international community. According to the statistical report in 2006 by International Energy Agency (IEA), many developed and developing countries, with manufacturing based economy, generate much higher carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions comparing to the other regions. The IEA reported statistical information reveals that there is much to be improved in reducing CO2 emissions in the industrial countries. Thereafter, Taiwan government also passed the Sustainable Energy Policy on World Environment Day in 2008 and committed to improve energy efficiency, develop clean energy, and ensure stable energy supply. Specifically, Taiwan has planned 10 benchmarking programs with 35 sub-projects in 2009 and announced that 2010 is the year of energy saving and carbon reduction. The objective of this paper is to develop a cost-benefit evaluation methodology to guide low carbon policy development. First, we use the input-output analysis and location quotient methods from top to bottom level to effectively assess the organization’s carbon footprint in a given region. In our in-depth case study, we apply the methods to Taiwan’s Penghu County’s (Taiwan’s largest island) low carbon island development project. Based on the assessment of carbon emissions in the given region, this research applies system dynamics (SD) approach to construct the mathematical model showing the causal feedback relationships for the island’s green transportation development. The causal feedback loop diagram is defined and used to analyze the effectiveness of required investment cost and the corresponding benefits for carbon reduction via green transportation strategy. Finally, the SD model is constructed and the policy scenarios are simulated to evaluate the time-varying impacts of proposed green transportation strategies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acquaye AA, Duffy AP. Input–output analysis of Irish construction sector greenhouse gas emissions. Building and Environment, 2010; 45(3): 784–791
Alcántara V, Padilla E. Input–output subsystems and pollution: an application to the service sector and CO2 emissions in Spain. Ecological Economics 2009, 68(3): 905–914
Carbon Trust. Available at: <http://www.carbontrust.co.uk/cut-carbon-reduce-costs/calculate/carbon-footprinting/pages/carbon-footprinting.aspx>. Accessed on: Nov. 29th 2010
Chang Y, Ries RJ, Wang Y. The embodied energy and environmental emissions of construction projects in china: An economic input-output LCA model. Journal of Energy Policy, 2010; 38(11): 6597–6603
Chen F, Duic N, Alves LM, Carvalho MG. Renewislands: Renewable energy solutions for islands. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2007; 11(8): 1888–1902
Forrester JW. Principles of System. In: MA: MIT Press, 1968
Han J, Hayashi Y. A system dynamics model of CO2 mitigation in China’s inter-city passenger transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2008; 13(5): 298–305
Huang YA, Weber CL, Matthews HS. Categorization of Scope 3 Emissions for Streamlined Enterprise Carbon Footprinting. Environmental science & Technology 2009, 43(22): 8509–8515
IPCC. Available at: <http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/index.htm.> Accessed on: Sep. 20th 2010
Jin W, Xu L, Yang Z. Modeling a policy making framework for urban sustainability: Incorporating system dynamics into the ecological footprint. Ecological Economics, 2009; 68(12): 2938–2949
Liu HY, Wu SD. An assessment on the planning and construction of an island renewable energy system: A case study of Kinmen Island. Renewable Energy, 2010; 35(12):2723–2731
Ju L, Chen B. An input-output model to analyze sector linkages and CO2 emissions. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2010; 2: 1841–1845
Machado D, Schaeffer R, Worrell E. Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: An input-output approach. Ecological Economics, 2001; 39(3): 409-424
Miller RE, Blair PD. Input–Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. In: New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1985.
Phdungsilp A. Integrated energy and carbon modelling with adecision support system: Policy scenarios for low-carbon city development in Bangkok. Energy Policy, 2010; 38: 4808-4817
Samso energy academy: Renewable energy Denmark. Available at: <http://www.onlinepdf.dk/Books/onlinepdf.aspx?onlinepdf=24054>. Accessed on: Nov. 21th 2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Trappey, A.J.C., Lin, G.Y.P., Ou, J.J.R., Hsiao, CT., Chen, K.W.P. (2011). Green Transportation Strategies and Impact Evaluation Using System Dynamic Modeling. In: Frey, D., Fukuda, S., Rock, G. (eds) Improving Complex Systems Today. Advanced Concurrent Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-799-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-799-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-798-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-799-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)