Skip to main content

Proposal of a NPD Diagnostic Method to Identify Improvement Opportunities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Improving Complex Systems Today

Abstract

This paper proposes a cause-effect diagnostic method to aid in the identification of New Product Development (NPD) improvement opportunities, called the Diagile Method. The proposed method is based on the CRT method and incorporates best practices of project management and activities to identify relevant opportunities for improvement. Templates are provided to assist in each phase of the Diagile application and a tool is provided for conducting effective interviews with NPD personnel. The main Diagile outputs are a current reality tree and a personalized portfolio of NPD improvement projects. A controlled experiment involving two independent groups was performed to evaluate the method at a large multinational office supply manufacturer. The results of this research suggest several managerial implications for improving the NPD process. The first is that effective diagnosis plays an important role in improving the NPD process. A cause-effect diagnostic method enables a healthy discussion among multidisciplinary NPD teams seeking to improve NPD to make the right choice of NPD improvement projects. Finally, the company reported that Diagile has proved to be an excellent method to analyze the NPD process and identify its problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BUSHE, G. R., MARSHAK, R. J. Revisioning Organization Development: Diagnostic and Dialogic Premises and Patterns of Practice. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2009: 45(3), 348-368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. CARBONARA, N., SCOZZI, B. Cognitive maps to analyze new product development processes: A case study. Technovation, 2006: 26(11), 1233-1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. CARRILLO, J. E., FRANZA, R. M. Investing in product development and production capabilities: The crucial linkage between time-to-market and ramp-up time. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006: 171, 536-556

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Costa, J. M.H., Amaral, C. S. T., Rozenfeld, H. Systematization of Recurring NPD Problems: Opportunities and Challenges in Expediting Process Diagnosis. In: 15th International Product Development Management Conference, 2009, Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  5. DOGGETT, A.M. A Statistical Comparison of Three Root Cause Analysis Tools. Jounal of Industrial Technology, 2004: 20 (2)

    Google Scholar 

  6. DOGGETT, A.M. Root Cause Analysis: A Framework for Tool Selection. The Quality Management Journa. 2005: 12 (4)

    Google Scholar 

  7. FREDENDALL, L.D., PATTERSON, J.W., LENHARTZ, C., MITCHELL, B.C. What should be changed? Quality Progress 2002: 35 (1),50-59

    Google Scholar 

  8. GOLDRATT, E. M. It`s not luck. Great Barrington: North River Press:1994

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goodrich, D. F. The relationship of the theory of constraints implementation to change management integration in professional service organizations. Ph.D. thesis. School of Business and Entrepreneurship, New Southeastern University, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  10. JESTON, J., NELIS, J. Business Process Management Practical Guidelines to Succesful Implementations. Oxford: Elsevier: 2008 (2o edition.)

    Google Scholar 

  11. MCCULLOCH, A., CRONSHAW, S.F. Reinstating the Lewinian vision: From force field analysis to organization field assessment. Organization Development Journal, 2008: 26(4), 89-103

    Google Scholar 

  12. ORTT, J. R., DUIN, P. A. The evolution of innovation management towards contextual innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2008: 11(4), 522-538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. RAHMAN, S. The theory of constraints`thinking process approach to developing strategies in supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribuition & Logistics Management, 2002: 3(10), 809-828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. VERNADAT, F. B. (1996). Enterprise Modeling and Integration: principles and applications. Springer

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to their GEI2 colleagues for their helpful suggestions, and to the Brazilian research funding agencies CNPq and CAPES for their financial support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janaina Mascarenhas Hornos da Costa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Costa, J.M.H.d., Amaral, C.S.T., Rozenfeld, H. (2011). Proposal of a NPD Diagnostic Method to Identify Improvement Opportunities. In: Frey, D., Fukuda, S., Rock, G. (eds) Improving Complex Systems Today. Advanced Concurrent Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-799-0_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-799-0_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-798-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-799-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics