Skip to main content

Logical Fragments in Ibn Khaldūn’s Muqaddimah

  • Chapter
The Unity of Science in the Arabic Tradition

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity of Science ((LEUS,volume 11))

Abstract

In this short contribution we briefly present life and times of Ibn Khaldūn, his magistral accomplishment in the Muqaddimah, and present Muqaddimah fragments related to logic and epistemology from the perspective of modern modal logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Black, D. L.: 2007, “Avicenna on Self-Awareness and Knowing that One Knows”, in S. Rahman, T. Street and H. Tahiri (eds.), The Unity of Science in the Arabic Tradition: Science, Logic, Epistemology and their Interactions, Dordrecht/Boston/London, Springer/ Kluwer (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D.L.: 2006, “Knowledge (‘Ilm) and Certitude (Yaqīn) in Al-Farabi’s Epistemology”, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 16 (1), 11–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boh, I.: 1993, Epistemic Logic in the Later Middle Ages, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Slane, M.: 1934-38, Les prolegomènes d’Ibn Khaldoun, translated and commented upon by M. de Slane, 3 vol., originally published in 1863, integrally reprinted in 1934, 1936, and 1938, Paris, Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutilh Novaes, C.: 2007, Formalizing Medieval Logical Theories, series Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science edited by S. Rahman and J. Symons, volume 7, Dordrecht/Boston/London, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1962, Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions, Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneale W. and Kneale, M.: 1962, The Development of Logic, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, S.: 2007a, “Bradwardine’s Revenge”, in J.C. Beall, Revenge of the Liar, Oxford University Press, To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, S: 2007b, Thomas Bradwardine and Epistemic Paradox, (Electronic) Proceedings of GMPR workshop on Medieval Logic, Bonn http://www.illc.uva.nl/GPMR-LS1/abstracts.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, S. (translator and editor): 2007c, Insolubles, translation in progress of Bradwardine’s Insolubilia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman S., T. Tulenheimo & E. Genot (eds.): 2007, Truth, Unity and the Liar: The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions to Semantic Paradoxes, series Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science edited by S. Rahman and J. Symons, volume 8, Springer/Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, F.: 2005, The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History, (Abridged Edition), translated and introduced by Franz Rosenthal, edited and abridged by N.J. Dawood, with a new introduction by Bruce B. Lawrence, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahiri H., S. Rahman and T. Street: 2007, “Introduction I: The Major Breakthrough in Scientific Practice”, in S. Rahman, T. Street and H. Tahiri (eds.), The Unity of Science in the Arabic Tradition: Science, Logic, Epistemology and their Interactions, Dordrecht/Boston/London, Springer/Kluwer (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, P.: 2007, “Logic and Metaphysics in Avicenna’s Modal Syllogistic” in S. Rahman, T. Street and H. Tahiri (eds.), The Unity of Science in the Arabic Tradition: Science, Logic, Epistemology and their Interactions, Dordrecht/Boston/London, Springer/Kluwer (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Uckelman S.L., J. Maat & K. Rybalko: 2008a, The Art of Doubting in Obligationes Parisienses, to appear in C. Kann, B. Loewe, C. Rode, and S.L. Uckelman, eds., Modern Views of Medieval Logic, Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales – Bibliotheca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uckelman S.L. et al. (translators): 2008b, Parisian Obligations, ILLC technical note X-2008-3, see http://www./illc.uva.nl/Publications/ResearchReports/X-2008-03.text.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ditmarsch, H.P.: 2005, “Prolegomena to Dynamic Logic for Belief Revision”, Synthese, 147, 229–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Ditmarsch, H.P. (2008). Logical Fragments in Ibn Khaldūn’s Muqaddimah. In: Rahman, S., Street, T., Tahiri, H. (eds) The Unity of Science in the Arabic Tradition. Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity of Science, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8405-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics