Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

De Abstracto et Concreto: Rationalism and Empirical Science in Leibniz

  • Chapter
Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist?

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity Of Science ((LEUS,volume 13))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beeley, P. 1995. Les sens dissimulants. Phénomènes et réalité dans l’Hypothesis physica nova. In: M. de Gaudemar (ed.), La notion de nature chez Leibniz. Stuttgart: Steiner, pp. 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeley, P. 1999. Mathematics and nature in Leibniz’s early philosophy. In: S. Brown (ed.), The Young Leibniz and his Philosophy (1646–1676). Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeley, P. 2004a. A philosophical apprenticeship: Leibniz’s correspondence with the secretary of the Royal Society, Henry Oldenburg. In: P. Lodge (ed.), Leibniz and His Correspondents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeley, P. 2004b. In inquirendo sunt gradus – Die Grenzen der Wissenschaft und wissenschaftliche Grenzen in der Leibnizschen Philosophie. Studia Leibnitiana 36: 22–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichant, M. (ed.) 1994. G. W. Leibniz, La réforme de la dynamique. De corporum concursu (1678) et autres textes inédits. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenbaum, U. 2004. Reason Light? Kritische Anmerkungen zu einer neuen Leibnizinterpretation. Studia Leibnitiana 36: 2–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. R. and Boas Hall, M. (eds). 1970. The Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg. Vol. 7. Madison, Milwaukee, London: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huygens, C. 1669. A summary account of the laws of motion. Philosophical Transactions 46(12 April 1669): 925–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinet, A. (ed.) 1991. G. W. Leibniz, Phoranomus seu de potentia et legibus naturae. Part 2. Physis 28: 797–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schepers, H. 2004. Non alter, sed etiam Leibnitius: Reply to Dascal’s Review Ex pluribus unum?. Leibniz Review 14: 117–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, J. 1669. Summary account of the general laws of motion. Philosophical Transactions 43 (11 January 1668/9): 864–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wren, C. 1669. Dr. Christopher Wren’s theory concerning the same subject. Philosophical Transactions 43 (11 January 1668/9): 867–868.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Philip Beeley

Authors
  1. Philip Beeley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Tel Aviv University, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel

    Marcelo Dascal (Prof) (Prof)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beeley, P. (2008). De Abstracto et Concreto: Rationalism and Empirical Science in Leibniz. In: Dascal, M. (eds) Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist?. Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity Of Science, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8668-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation