Skip to main content

Valuing Knowledge Within Virtual CoPs: The Quest for Meaningful Indicators

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning

Part of the book series: Annals of Information Systems ((AOIS,volume 4))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the challenge of developing a comprehensive model of knowledge value tracking within virtual Communities of Practice (CoPs) outlining the conditions of knowledge value creation, diffusion and storing. Built upon a study of participation and reification processes within virtual CoPs, the model identifies and articulates three subsets of knowledge value (1) the potential value of knowledge; (2) the effective value of knowledge; and (3) the value of the knowledge base. On this basis we propose related parameters and indicators of knowledge value-tracking by detecting and interpreting traces and signs from the use of functionalities of collaborative solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amin, A., and J. Roberts. 2008. The resurgence of community in economic thought and practice. In Community, economic creativity, and organization, ed. A. Amin, and J. Roberts. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barlatier, P-J., G. Vidou, S. Jacquemart, and T. Latour. 2007. Don’t value the valueless: Toward a model of evaluation of knowledge within e-CoPs. Second International Workshop on Building Technology Enhanced Learning solutions for Communities of Practice, Crete, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, R.J., and R.V. Tenkasi. 1995. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science 6(4): 350–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., and P. Duguid. 1991. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science 2(1): 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. 1998. Toward a knowledge context: Report on the first annual U.C Berkeley forum on knowledge and the firm. California Management Review 40(3): 22–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D.N., and J.S. Brown. 1999. Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science 10(4): 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daele, A. 2006. A model for representing professional development through the participation in a virtual CoP: Uses for developing enhanced services. First International Workshop on Building Technology Enhanced Learning solutions for Communities of Practice, Crete, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3): 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., M. Baker, A. Blaye, and C. O’Malley. 1996. The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science, ed. E. Spada, and P. Reiman, 198–211. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gongla, P., and C.R. Rizzuto. 2001. Evolving communities of practice: IBM global services experience. IBM Systems Journal 40(4): 842–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., and U. Zander. 1996. What firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organization Science 7(5): 502–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A.D. 2001. Knowledge management technology. IBM Systems Journal 40(4): 814–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. 1999. Learning across teams: The role of communities of practice in team organizations. Knowledge Management Review 8: 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M.W., and V. Gupta. 1994. The performance paradox. In Research in organizational behavior, ed. B.W. Staw, and L. Cummings, 309–369. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., and S. Ghoshal. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(2): 242–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, J. 1990. Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarbrough, H., J. Swan, and J. Preston. 1999. Knowledge management: A literature review. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siesfeld, G.A. 1998. The measurement of knowledge: Introduction. In The economic impact of knowledge, ed. D. Neef, G.A. Siesfeld, and J. Cefola, 191–202. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F.J. 1989. Autonomie et Connaissance: Essai sur le Vivant. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Krogh, G. 2003. Knowledge sharing and the communal resource. In Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management, ed. M. Easterby-Smith, and M. Lyles, 372–392. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. 1979. The social psychology of organizing, 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., R. McDermott, and W. Snyder. 2002. Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zack, M.H., and M. Serino. 2000. Knowledge management and collaboration technologies. In Knowledge, groupware, and the Internet, ed. D.E. Smith. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre-Jean Barlatier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barlatier, PJ., Naudet, Y., Vidou, G., Watrinet, ML. (2009). Valuing Knowledge Within Virtual CoPs: The Quest for Meaningful Indicators. In: King, W. (eds) Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. Annals of Information Systems, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0011-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics