Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

ACL2 and Its Applications to Digital System Verification

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design and Verification of Microprocessor Systems for High-Assurance Applications

Abstract

We describe a methodology for using a mechanical theorem proving system, ACL2, to verify correctness properties for digital system models. After introducing some of the basic terminology and some of the decisions facing those who wish to formalize digital systems, we introduce ACL2, A Computational Logic for Applicative Common Lisp, which is a functional programming language, a first-order mathematical logic, and a proof development environment including a powerful interactive automated theorem prover. We then show how a simple digital system can be formalized in ACL2 and exhibit or describe formal properties provable about it. We conclude with some bibliographic references to examples of variations of the illustrated approach, various proof strategies, and examples of industrial interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bevier W, Hunt WA Jr, Moore JS, Young W (1989) Special issue on system verification. J Autom Reason 5(4):409–530

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boyer RS, Moore JS (1979) A computational logic. Academic, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyer RS, Moore JS (1981) Metafunctions: proving them correct and using them efficiently as new proof procedures. In: Boyer RS, Moore JS (eds) The correctness problem in computer science. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyer RS, Moore JS (1997) A computational logic handbook, 2nd edn. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boyer RS, Moore JS (2002) Single-threaded objects in ACL2. In: PADL 2002, LNCS 2257. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 9–27. http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/moore/publications/stobj/main.ps.gz

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boyer RS, Yu Y (1996) Automated proofs of object code for a widely used microprocessor. J ACM 43(1):166–192

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Brock B, Hunt WA Jr (1999) Formal analysis of the motorola CAP DSP. In: Hinchey M, Bowen J (eds) Industrial-strength formal methods. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  8. Flatau AD (1992) A verified implementation of an applicative language with dynamic storage allocation. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flatau A, Kaufmann M, Reed D, Russinoff D, Smith E, Sumners R (2002) Formal verification of microprocessors at AMD. In: Proceedings of designing correct circuits 2002. http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~ms/DCC02/Slides.html

  10. Goerigk W, Hoffmann U (1998) Rigorous compiler implementation correctness: how to prove the real thing correct. In: Proceedings FM-TRENDS’98 international workshop on current trends in applied formal methods, Boppard, LNCS

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goodstein RL (1964) Recursive number theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  12. Greve D, Wilding M (2002) Evaluatable, high-assurance microprocessors. In: NSA high-confidence systems and software conference (HCSS), Linthicum, MD. http://hokiepokie.org/docs/hcss02/proceedings.pdf

  13. Greve D, Wilding M, Hardin D (2000) High-speed, analyzable simulators. In: Kaufmann M, Manolios P, Moore JS (eds) Computer-aided reasoning: ACL2 case studies. Kluwer, Boston, MA, pp 113–136

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greve D, Wilding M, Vanfleet WM (2003) A separation kernel formal security policy. In: ACL2 workshop 2003, Boulder, CO. http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/moore/acl2/workshop-2003/

  15. Greve D, Richards R, Wilding M (2004) A summary of intrinsic partitioning verification. In: ACL2 workshop 2004, Austin, TX. http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/moore/acl2/workshop-2003/

  16. Greve D, Wilding M, Richards R, Vanfleet M (2005) Formalizing security policies for dynamic and distributed systems. In: Proceedings of systems and software technology conference (SSTC) 2005, Salt Lake City, UT. http://hokiepokie.org/docs/sstc05.pdf

  17. Greve D, Kaufmann M, Manolios P, Moore JS, Ray S, Ruiz-Reina JL, Sumners R, Vroon D, Wilding M (2008) Efficient execution in an automated reasoning environment. J Funct Program 18(01):15–46

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hardin D, Wilding M, Greve D (1998) Transforming the theorem prover into a digital design tool: from concept car to off-road vehicle. In: Hu AJ, Vardi MY (eds) Computer-aided verification – CAV ’98, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1427. Springer, Heidelberg. See http://pobox.com/users/hokie/docs/concept.ps

  19. Hardin DS, Smith EW, Young WD (2006) A robust machine code proof framework for highly secure applications. In: ACL2 ’06: proceedings of the sixth international workshop on the ACL2 theorem prover and its applications. ACM, New York, NY, pp 11–20. DOI http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1217975.1217978

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hunt WA Jr (1994) FM8501: a verified microprocessor. LNAI 795. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hunt WA Jr (2000) The DE language. In: Kaufmann M, Manolios P, Moore JS (eds) Computer-aided reasoning: ACL2 case studies. Kluwer, Boston, MA, pp 151–166

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hunt WA Jr, Brock B (1992) A formal HDL and its use in the FM9001 verification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Physical and Engineering Sciences, 339(1652):35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hunt WA Jr, Kaufmann M, Krug RB, Moore JS, Smith EW (2005) Meta reasoning in ACL2. In: Hurd J, Melham T (eds) 18th international conference on theorem proving in higher order logics: TPHOLs 2005, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3603. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 163–178

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kaufmann M (2008) Aspects of ACL2 User interaction (Invited talk, 8th international workshop on user interfaces for theorem provers (UITP 2008), Montreal, Canada, August, 2008). See www.ags.uni-sb.de/~omega/workshops/UITP08/kaufmann-UITP08/talk.html

  25. Kaufmann M (2009) Abbreviated output for input in ACL2: an implementation case study. In: Proceedings of ACL2 workshop 2009. http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/sandip/acl2-09

  26. Kaufmann M, Moore JS (1997) A precise description of the ACL2 logic. Technical report, Deparment of Computer Sciences, University of Texas at Austin. http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/moore/publications/km97a.ps.gz

  27. Kaufmann M, Moore JS (2001) Structured theory development for a mechanized logic. J Autom Reason 26(2):161–203

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaufmann M, Moore JS (2008a) An ACL2 tutorial. In: Proceedings of theorem proving in higher order logics, 21st international conference, TPHOLs 2008. Springer, Heidelberg. See http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71067-7_4

  29. Kaufmann M, Moore JS (2008b) Proof search debugging tools in ACL2. In: A Festschrift in honour of Prof. Michael J. C. Gordon FRS. Royal Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kaufmann M, Moore JS (2009) The ACL2 home page. http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/moore/acl2/

  31. Kaufmann M, Manolios P, Moore JS (eds) (2000a) Computer-aided reasoning: ACL2 case studies. Kluwer, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kaufmann M, Manolios P, Moore JS (2000b) Computer-aided reasoning: an approach. Kluwer, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kaufmann M, Moore JS, Ray S, Reeber E (2009) Integrating external deduction tools with ACL2. J Appl Logic 7(1):3–25

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaufmann M, Moore JS, Ray S (in press) Foundations of automated induction for a structured mechanized logic

    Google Scholar 

  35. Liu H (2006) Formal specification and verification of a jvm and its bytecode verifier. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin

    Google Scholar 

  36. Manolios P (2000) Correctness of pipelined machines. In: Formal methods in computer-aided design, FMCAD 2000, LNCS 1954. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 161–178

    Google Scholar 

  37. Manolios P, Vroon D (2003) Ordinal arithmetic in ACL2. In: ACL2 workshop 2003, Boulder, CO. http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/moore/acl2/workshop-2003/

  38. Manolios P, Namjoshi K, Sumners R (1999) Linking theorem proving and model-checking with well-founded bisimulation. In: Computed aided verification, CAV ’99, LNCS 1633. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 369–379

    Google Scholar 

  39. Matthews J, Moore JS, Ray S, Vroon D (2006) Verification condition generation via theorem proving. In: Proceedings of 13th international conference on logic for programming, artificial intelligence, and reasoning (LPAR 2006), vol LNCS 4246, pp 362–376

    Google Scholar 

  40. Moore JS (1996) Piton: a mechanically verified assembly-level language. Automated reasoning series. Kluwer, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  41. Moore JS (2008) Mechanized operational semantics: lectures and supplementary material. In: Marktoberdorf summer school 2008: engineering methods and tools for software safety and security. http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/moore/publications/talks/marktoberdorf-08/index.html

  42. Moore JS, Lynch T, Kaufmann M (1998) A mechanically checked proof of the correctness of the kernel of the AMD5K86 floating point division algorithm. IEEE Trans Comput 47(9): 913–926

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Ray S, Hunt WA Jr (2004) Deductive verification of pipelined machines using first-order quantification. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on computer-aided verification (CAV 2004), vol LNCS 3117. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 31–43

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Ray S, Moore JS (2004) Proof styles in operational semantics. In: Hu AJ, Martin AK (eds) Formal methods in computer-aided design (FMCAD-2004), Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3312. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 67–81

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ray S, Hunt WA Jr, Matthews J, Moore JS (2008) A mechanical analysis of program verification strategies. J Autom Reason 40(4):245–269

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Reeber E, Hunt WA Jr (2005) Formalization of the DE2 language. In: Correct hardware design and verification methods (CHARME 2005), vol LNCS 3725. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 20–34

    Google Scholar 

  47. Reeber E, Hunt WA Jr (2006) A SAT-based decision procedure for the subclass of unrollable list functions in ACL2 (SULFA). In: Proceedings of 3rd international joint conference on automated reasoning (IJCAR 2006). Springer, Heidelberg, pp 453–467

    Google Scholar 

  48. Russinoff DM, Flatau A (2000) RTL verification: a floating-point multiplier. In: Kaufmann M, Manolios P, Moore JS (eds) Computer-aided reasoning: ACL2 case studies. Kluwer, Boston, MA, pp 201–232

    Google Scholar 

  49. Russinoff D, Kaufmann M, Smith E, Sumners R (2005) Formal verification of floating-point RTL at AMD using the ACL2 theorem prover. In: IMACS’2005 world congress

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sawada J (2000) Verification of a simple pipelined machine model. In: Kaufmann M, Manolios P, Moore JS (eds) Computer-aided reasoning: ACL2 case studies. Kluwer, Boston, MA, pp 137–150

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sawada J (2002) Formal verification of divide and square root algorithms using series calculation. In: Proceedings of the ACL2 workshop, 2002, Grenoble. http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/moore/acl2/workshop-2002

  52. Sawada J, Hunt WA Jr (1998) Processor verification with precise exceptions and speculative execution. In: Computer aided verification, CAV ’98, LNCS 1427. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 135–146

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sawada J, Hunt WA Jr (2002) Verification of FM9801: an out-of-order microprocessor model with speculative execution, exceptions, and program modification capability. Formal Methods Syst Des 20(2):187–222

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Shankar N (1994) Metamathematics, machines, and Godel’s proof. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  55. Shoenfield JR (1967) Mathematical logic. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Steele GL Jr (1990) Common lisp the language, 2nd edn. Digital Press, Burlington, MA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Wilding M (1993) A mechanically verified application for a mechanically verified environment. In: Courcoubetis C (ed) Computer-aided verification – CAV ’93, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 697. Springer, Heidelberg. See ftp://ftp.cs.utexas.edu/pub/boyer/nqthm/wilding-cav93.ps

    Google Scholar 

  58. Young WD (1988) A verified code generator for a subset of Gypsy. Technical report 33. Computational Logic Inc., Austin, TX

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Matt Kaufmann

Authors
  1. Matt Kaufmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J Strother Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matt Kaufmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Rockwell Collins, Inc., Collins Road NE., 400, Cedar Rapids, 52498, USA

    David S. Hardin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaufmann, M., Moore, J.S. (2010). ACL2 and Its Applications to Digital System Verification. In: Hardin, D. (eds) Design and Verification of Microprocessor Systems for High-Assurance Applications. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1539-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1539-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1538-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1539-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation