Abstract
The Network-on-Chip (NoC) paradigm has emerged as a revolutionary methodology for integrating a very high number of intellectual property (IP) blocks in a single die. The achievable performance benefit arising out of adopting NoCs is constrained by the performance limitation imposed by the metal wire, which is the physical realization of communication channels. With technology scaling, only depending on the material innovation will extend the lifetime of conventional interconnect systems a few technology generations. According to International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) for the longer term, new interconnect paradigms are in need. The conventional two dimensional (2D) integrated circuit (IC) has limited floor-planning choices, and consequently it limits the performance enhancements arising out of NoC architectures. Three dimensional (3D) ICs are capable of achieving better performance, functionality, and packaging density compared to more traditional planar ICs. On the other hand, NoC is an enabling solution for integrating large numbers of embedded cores in a single die. 3D NoC architectures combine the benefits of these two new domains to offer an unprecedented performance gain. This chapter quantifies the performance of 3D NoC architectures. It demonstrates functionality in terms of throughput, latency, energy dissipation, and wiring area overhead. It also addresses the temperature concerns that are apparent in 3D integrated circuits in general as well as many emerging 2D applications, showing that the characteristics of 3D NoCs limit what would otherwise be a dramatic increase in temperature, and in a certain case, even reduce temperature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
P. Magarshack and P. G. Paulin, “System-on-Chip Beyond the Nanometer Wall,” Proceedings of 40th Design Automation Conf. (DAC 03), ACM Press, 2003, pp. 419–424.
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors 2005: Interconnect, [online] http://www.itrs.net/
A. W. Topol et al., “Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits,” IBM Journal of Research & Development, vol. 50, no. 4/5, July/Sept. 2006, pp. 491–506.
W. R. Davis et al., “Demystifying 3D ICs: The Pros and Cons of Going Vertical,” IEEE Design and Test of Computers, vol. 22, no. 6, Nov. 2005.
Y. Deng et al., “2.5D System Integration: A Design Driven System Implementation Schema,” Proceedings of the Asia South Pacific Design Automation Conference, 2004.
M. Ieong et al., “Three Dimensional CMOS Devices and Integrated Circuits,” Proceedings of IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2003.
L. Benini and G. De Micheli, “Networks on Chips: A New SoC Paradigm,” IEEE Computer, Jan. 2002, pp. 70–78.
W. J. Dally and B. Towles, “Route Packets, Not Wires: On-Chip Interconnection Networks,” Proceedings of the 2001 DAC, June 18–22, 2001, pp. 683–689.
F. Li et al., “Design and Management of 3D Chip Multiprocessors Using Network-in-Memory,” Proceedings of the 33rd International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA’06), pp. 130–141.
V. F. Pavlidis and E. G. Friedman, “3-D Topologies for Networks-on-Chip,” IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI), October 2007, pp. 1081–1090.
J. Srinivasan et al., “Exploiting Structural Duplication for Lifetime Reliability Enhancement,” Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA’05), pp. 520–531.
J. Tsai, C. C. Chen, G. Chen, B. Goplen, H. Qian, Y. Zhan, S. Kang, M. D. F. Wong, and S. S. Sapatnekar, “Temperature-Aware Placement for SoCs,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 94, no. 8, Aug. 2006, pp. 1502–1518.
T. Theocharides, G. Link, N. Vijaykrishnan, and M. Irwin, “Implementing LDPC Decoding on Network-on-Chip,” Proceedings of the International Conference on VLSI Design, 2005 (VLSID 2005), pp. 134–137.
S. Vangal et al., “An 80-Tile 1.28TFLOPS Network-on-Chip in 65 nm CMOS,” Proceedings of IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), 2007, pp. 98–99.
Tilera Co. http://www.tilera.com
P. Jacob et al., “Predicting the Performance of a 3D Processor-Memory Stack,” IEEE Design and Test of Computers, Nov. 2005, pp. 540–547.
R. I. Greenberg and L. Guan, “An Improved Analytical Model for Wormhole Routed Networks with Application to Butterfly Fat Trees,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP 1997), pp. 44–48.
C. Grecu et al., “A Scalable Communication-Centric SoC Interconnect Architecture,” Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design, 2004, pp. 343–348.
P. Guerrier and A. Greiner, “A Generic Architecture for On-Chip Packet-Switched Interconnections,” Proceedings of Design and Test in Europe (DATE), Mar. 2000, pp. 250–256.
C. Grecu, P. P. Pande, A. Ivanov, and R. Saleh, “Timing Analysis of Network on Chip Architectures for MP-SoC Platforms,” Microelectronics Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36, no. 9, Mar. 2005, pp. 833–845.
P. P. Pande, C. Grecu, M. Jones, A. Ivanov, and R. Saleh, “Performance Evaluation and Design Trade-offs for Network on Chip Interconnect Architectures,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 54, no. 8, Aug. 2005, pp. 1025–1040.
J. Duato, S. Yalamanchili, and L. Ni, Interconnection Networks—An Engineering Approach, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA,2002.
K. Park and W. Willinger, Self-Similar Network Traffic and Performance Evaluation, John Wiley & Sons, New York,2000.
D. R. Avresky, V. Shubranov, R. Horst, and P. Mehra, “Performance Evaluation of the ServerNetR SAN under Self-Similar Traffic,” Proceedings of 13th International and 10th Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing, April 12–16th, 1999, pp. 143–147.
G. V. Varatkar and R. Marculescu, “On-Chip Traffic Modeling and Synthesis for MPEG-2 Video Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 8, no. 3, June 2000, pp. 335–339.
Circuits Multi-Projects. http://cmp.imag.fr/
K. C. Saraswat et al., “Technology and Reliability Constrained Future Copper Interconnects—Part II: Performance Implications,” IEEE Transaction Electron Devices, vol. 49, no. 4, Apr. 2002, pp. 598–604.
P. P. Pande, C. Grecu, M. Jones, A. Ivanov, and R. Saleh, “Effect of Traffic Localization on Energy Dissipation in NoC-based Interconnect,” Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 23rd–26th May 2005, pp. 1774–1777.
J. A. Davis, R. Venkatesan, A. Kaloyeros, M. Beylansky, S. J. Souri, K. Banerjee, K. C. Saraswat, A. Rahman, R. Reif, and J. D. Meindl, “Interconnect Limits on Gigascale Integration (GSI) in the 21st Century,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 89, no 3, Mar. 2001, pp. 305–324.
D. Meeks, “Fundamentals of Heat Transfer in a Multilayer System,” Microwave Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, Jan. 1992, pp. 165–172.
W. Huang, K. Sankaranarayanan, R. J. Ribando, M. R. Stan, and K. Skadron, “An Improved Block-Based Thermal Model in HotSpot 4.0 with Granularity Considerations,” Proceedings of the Workshop on Duplicating, Deconstructing, and Debunking, in conjunction with the 34th International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA), June 2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feero, B.S., Pande, P. (2011). Three-Dimensional Networks-on-Chip: Performance Evaluation. In: Sheibanyrad, A., Pétrot, F., Jantsch, A. (eds) 3D Integration for NoC-based SoC Architectures. Integrated Circuits and Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7618-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7618-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7617-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7618-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)