Abstract
Despite the broad range of applications that can benefit from active database systems, current practice shows that the availability of active mechanisms in most commercial database systems is no guarantee that they will be used. This is partly due to the lack of sophisticated tools to assist in the process of designing, debugging, and administrating large rule sets. This chapter reports advances achieved so far, and identifies areas where enhancements are required.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
W.R. Adrion, M.A. Branstad, and J.C. Cherniavsky. Validation, Verification and Testing of Computer Software. ACM Computing Surveys, 14(2):159–192, 1982.
E. Baralis, S. Ceri, P. Praternali, and S. Paraboschi. Support Environment for Active Rule Design. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, (7):129–149, 1996.
E. Baralis, S. Ceri, and S. Paraboschi. Modularization Techniques for Active Rules Design. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 21(1):1–29, 1996.
H. Behrends. Simulation-Based Debugging for Active Databases. In Proceedings of the 4th Intl. Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering (RIDE-ADS’ 94), pages 172–180, 1994.
E. Benazet, H. Guehl, and M. Bouzebhoub. VITAL: a Visual Tool for Analysis of Rule Behaviour in Active Databases. In [Sel95], pages 182–196, 1995.
P. Bichler and M. Schrefl. Active Object-Oriented Database using Active Object/Behaviour Diagrams. In Proceedings of the 4th Intl. Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering (RIDE-ADS’ 94), pages 163–171, 1994.
A.P. Buchmann. Current Trends in Active Databases: Are we Solving the Right Problems. In C. Chrisment, editor, Information Systems Design and Multimedia (Proc. Basque International Workshop on IT), pages 121–133. Cepadues Editions, 1994.
S. Chakravarthy, Z. Tamizuddin, and J. Zhou. A Visualization and Explanation Tool for Debugging ECA rules in Active Databases. In [Sel95], pages 196–209, 1995.
O. Diaz, A. Jaime, and N.W. Paton. DEAR: A DEbugger for Active Rules in an Object-Oriented Context. In N.W. Paton and M.H. Williams, editors, Proc. 1st Intl. Workshop on Rules In Database Systems, pages 180–193. Springer-Verlag, 1994.
O. Diaz and N. Paton. Stimuli and Business Policies as Modelling Constructs: Their Definition and Validation Through the Event Calculus. In Proc. 9th. CAiSE, pages 33–46. LNCS, Springer-Verlag, 1997.
O. Etzion. Reasoning About the Behavior of Active Database Applications. In [Sel95], pages 86–100, 1995.
Y.A. Feldman and H. Schneider. Simulating Reactive Systems by Deduction. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 2(2):128–175, 1993.
A. Fuggetta. A Classification of CASE Technology. Computer, 26(12):25–38, 1993.
A. Geppert, S. Gatziu, and K.R. Dittrich. A Designer’s Benchmark for Active Database Management Systems: 007 Meets the BEAST. In [Sel95], pages 309–323, 1995.
A. Geppert, S. Gatziu, and K.R. Dittrich. Rulebase Evolution in Active Object-Oriented Database Systems: Adapting the Past to Future Needs. Technical Report 95.13, Institut fuer Informatik, Winterthurerstr. 190, CH-8047, Zurich, 1995.
J.A. Gulla. A General Explanation Component for Conceptual Modeling in CASE Environments. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 14(3):297–329, 1996.
H. Herbst. Business Rules in Systems Analysis: A Meta-Model and Repository System. Journal of Information Systems, 21(2):147–166, 1996.
B. Lientz, E.B. Swanson, and G.E. Tompkins. Characteristics of Mpplications Software Maintenance. Communication of ACM, (21):466–471, 1978.
A. Neufeld, G. Moerkotte, and P.C. Lockemann. Generating Consistency Test Data: Restricting the Search Space by a Generator Formula. VLDB Journal, 2(2):173–213, 1993.
S. Navathe, A. Tanaka, R. Madhavan, and Y. H. Gan. A Methodology for Application Design Using Active Database Technology. In Report RL-TR-95-41 from the Rome Laboratory, 1995.
T. Sellis, editor. Proc. 2nd Intl. Workshop on Rules in Database Systems (RIDS’ 95). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, 1995.
M. Stonebraker, E. Hanson, and S. Potamianos. The POST-GRES Rule Manager. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 14(7), 1988.
E. Simon and A. Kotz-Dittrich. Promises and Realities of Active Database Systems. In Proc. 21st VLDB Conference, pages 642–653. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995.
M. Stonebraker. The Integration of Rule Systems and Database Systems. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 4(5):415–423, 1992.
M. Teisseire and R. Cichetti. An Algebraic Approach for Event-Driven Modelling. In D. Karagiannis, editor, Proc. Intl. Conf. on Databases and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA), pages 300–309. LNCS, Springer-Verlag, 1994.
M. Teisseire, P. Poncelet, and R. Cichetti. Towards Event-Driven Modelling for Database Design. In J. Bocca, M. Jarke, and C. Zaniolo, editors, Proc. 20th Intl. Conf. on VLDB, pages 1–12. Morgan-Kaufmann, 1994.
J. Widom. Research Issues in Active Database Systems: Report from Closing Panel at RIDE-ADS 94. In SIGMOD RECORD, volume 23 (3), pages 41–43, 1994.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Díaz, O. (1999). Tool Support. In: Paton, N.W. (eds) Active Rules in Database Systems. Monographs in Computer Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8656-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8656-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6448-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8656-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive