Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Towards Understanding Contradictions in Enterprise System Implementations—Insights from a Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems Development

Abstract

This paper presents findings from a study of the implementation of an enterprise system in an organization. The implementation process is viewed from a dialectic perspective, which means thinking in terms of contradictions. This paper raises the following research question: How can we understand contradictions in enterprise system (ES) implementations? To answer this question, an interpretive research approach was chosen. The empirical part is a longitudinal case study. The system was in this case an innovative combination of collaboration and information management technologies. The main contradiction studied in this case was between an as-is implementation of standard software, and an implementation fulfilling the organizational requirements of solution integration and user experience. To understand the issues involved in this dialectic of adaptation, three different perspectives are applied. These are (i) considering ES vendor challenges, (ii) exploring contradictions in the chartering phase, and (iii) understanding contradictions in the project phase. This paper contributes to understanding how the dialectic of adaptation may emerge, and presents three perspectives for understanding contradictions that may occur as an enterprise system is implemented. This understanding may help to constructively deal with dialectics in future enterprise system implementations. Implications for both research and practice are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen JP (2005). Value conflicts in enterprise systems. Inf Technol People 18(1):33–49

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty RC, Williams CD (2006) ERP II: Best practices for successfully implementing an ERP upgrade. Commun ACM 49(3):105–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besson P, Rowe F (2001) ERP project dynamics and enacted dialogue: perceived understanding, perceived leeway, and the nature of task-related conflicts. SIGMIS Data 32(4):47–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra A (2006) Interpreting an ERP-implementation project from a stakeholder perspective. Int J Project Manag 24:38–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bühne S, Lauenroth K, Pohl K (2005) Modelling requirements variability across product lines. 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, Paris, France, IEEE Computer Society, pp 41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1998) Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Rev 76(4):122–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel J (1979) The language of dialectics and the dialectics of language. Munksgaard, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad Manag Rev 24(4):691–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leishman DA (1999) Solution customization. IBM Syst J 38(1):76–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus ML (1997) The qualitative difference in IS research and practice. Proceedings of the IFIP TC 8 8.2 International Conference on Information Systems and Qualitative Research, Philadelphia, pp 11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Munkvold BE, Tvedte B (2003) Implementing a portfolio of collaboration technologies in Statoil. In: Munkvold BE (ed) Implementing collaboration technologies in industry. Springer, London, pp 81–107

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nordheim S (2007) Towards a dialectic understanding of enterprise systems – vendor challenges and contradictory rhetoric. In: Magyar G et al (eds) Advances of information systems development: new methods and practice for the networked society, vol 1, Springer, New York, pp 11–22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nordheim S (2008) Corporate user representatives and the dialectics of enterprise systems: a quest for social actors with political skill. Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii. IEEE (CD-ROM)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordheim S, Nielsen PA (2008) Enterprise system implementations: organizational influence processes for corporate user representatives. Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Information Systems, Galway, Ireland. (CD-ROM)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordheim S, Päivärinta T (2004) Customization of enterprise content management systems: an exploratory case study. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference of System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii. IEEE (CD-ROM)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordheim S, Päivärinta T (2006) Implementing enterprise content management: from evolution through strategy to contradictions out-of-the-box. Eur J Inf Syst 15:648–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Päivärinta T, Munkvold BE (2005) Enterprise content management: An integrated perspective on information management. In: Sprague JR RH (ed) Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, CD-ROM, IEEE, Los Alamitos

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew AM (1995) Longitudinal field research on change. In: Huber GP, Van de Ven AH (eds) Longitudinal field research methods: studying processes of organizational change. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 91–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey D, Ross JW, Boudreau M-C (2002) Learning to implement enterprise systems: An exploratory study of the dialectics of change. J Manag Inf Syst 19(1): 17–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabherwal R, Newman M (2003) Persistence and change in system development: a dialectical view. J Inf Technol 18(2): 69–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon PB (2005) Are ERP systems a source of competitive advantage? Strategic Change 14:283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedera D, Gable GG, Chan T (2004) Measuring enterprise systems success: The importance of a multiple stakeholder perspective. Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems, Turku, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • Sia SK, Soh C (2007) An assessment of package–organisation misalignment: Institutional and ontological structures. Eur J Inf Syst 16:568–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith HA, McKeen JD (2003) Developments in practice viii: enterprise content management. Commun AIS 11(33):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh C, Sia SK et al (2003) Misalignments in ERP implementation: a dialectic perspective. Int J Hum Comput Interact 16(1):81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soh C, Sia SK (2005) The challenges of implementing vanilla versions of enterprise systems. MIS Quart Executive 4(3):373–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven AH, Poole MS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):510–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15: 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward J, Hemingway C, Daniel E (2005) A framework for addressing the organisational issues of enterprise systems implementation. J Strategic Inf Syst 14: 97–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei H-L, Wang ETG, Pei-Hung J (2005) Understanding misalignment and cascading change of ERP implementation: a stage view of process analysis. Eur J Inf Syst 14(4):324–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Agder, Postboks 422, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway

    Stig Nordheim

Authors
  1. Stig Nordheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stig Nordheim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fac. Mathematics & Physics, Dept. Software Engineering, Charles University Praha, Malostranske nam. 25, Praha 1, 118 00, Czech Republic

    Jaroslav Pokorny

  2. Dept. Information Technologies, Attn. Prof. Jiri Vorisek, Prague University of Economics, Nam. W. Churchilla 4, Praha, 130 67, Czech Republic

    Vaclav Repa

  3. Fac. Mathematics & Physics, Charles University, Praha, Malostranske nam. 25, Praha 1, 118 00, Czech Republic

    Karel Richta

  4. College of Business & Economics, Dept. Information Technology &, Boise State University, Univesity Dr. 1910, Boise, 83725-1615, Idaho, USA

    Wita Wojtkowski

  5. Fac. Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, Victoria, Australia

    Henry Linger

  6. Dept. Accountancy & Finance, National University of Ireland, University Road, Galway, Ireland

    Chris Barry

  7. Dept. Accountancy & Finance, National University of Ireland, University Road, Galway, Ireland

    Michael Lang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nordheim, S. (2011). Towards Understanding Contradictions in Enterprise System Implementations—Insights from a Case Study. In: Pokorny, J., et al. Information Systems Development. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9790-6_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9790-6_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9645-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9790-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics