Skip to main content

Sketches as Mental Reifications of Theoretical Scientific Treatment

  • Chapter
Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning
  • 667 Accesses

Abstract

Sketches are used abundantly in the practice of science. The purposes for which they are used are diverse, such as illustration, exemplification or data display. Moreover, sketches in science can be of very different things — from concrete objects to abstract conceptions. The graph of a mathematical function is very different in what it shows from a drawing of an experimental set-up or from an X-ray picture. My focus, in this paper, is on a quite specific use of sketches: sketches that stand for the theoretical treatment of empirical phenomena;’ they function as substitutes for the physical processes (and their theoretical description) that are thought to produce these phenomena. Examples for such sketches will be given below. Relying on conventions old and new, the point is that theoretical information — abstract theories from physics as they are applied to an empirical phenomenon — is put into pictures. This means that, in effect, abstract and theoretical conceptions about the empirical world, mostly expressed in mathematical formulae, are reified, i.e. “made into a thing”.2 By being put into a picture, scientific treatment dominated by theoretical conceptions is effectively made into two-dimensional objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailer, D.M. (1993). The dynamics of extragalactic radio sources. M.Phil. Dissertation, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bailer-Jones, D.M. (1997). Scientific models: A cognitive approach with an application in astrophysics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bailer-Jones, D.M. (1999). Creative strategies employed in modelling: A case study. Foundations of Science 4:375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailer-Jones, D.M. (2000). Modelling extended extragalactic radio sources. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31B:49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Best, P.N., Bailer, D.M., Longair, M.S. and Riley, J.M. (1995). Radio source asymmetries and unified schemes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 275:1171–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giere, R. (1996). Visual models and scientific judgment. In: B.S. Baigrie (Ed.), Scientific illustration: Historical and philosophical problems concerning the interaction between art and science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 269–302.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Glenberg, A.M. and Langston, W.E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language 31:129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hey, J.S., Parson, S.J. and Phillips, J.W. (1946). Fluctuations in cosmic radiation at radio frequencies. Nature 158:234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Katona, G. (1940). Organizing and memorizing: Studies in the psychology of learning and teaching. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Larkin, J.H. and Simon, H.A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11:65–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Leahy, J.P. and Perley, R.A. (1991). VLA images of 23 extragalactic radio sources. Astronomical Journal 102:537–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, A. (1986). Imagery in scientific thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nersessian, N.J. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Vol. XV. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ruse, M. (1991). Are pictures really necessary? The case of Sewell Wright’s “adaptive landscapes”. In A. Fine, M. Forbes and L. Wessels (Eds), PSA 1990, Vol. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wimsatt, W.C. (1991). Taming the dimensions: Visualizations in science. In A. Fine, M. Forbes and L. Wessels (Eds), PSA 1990. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 111–135.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bailer-Jones, D.M. (2002). Sketches as Mental Reifications of Theoretical Scientific Treatment. In: Anderson, M., Meyer, B., Olivier, P. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0109-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0109-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-242-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0109-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics