Abstract
Kulhavy and his colleagues found that when a map and related factual information were learned together, the probability of recalling the factual information was greater than when information was learned without a map, or with a list of place names. They account for this finding with their “conjoint retention” hypothesis - a corollary of Paivio’s “dual coding” theory. The present study extended this research by including a group of blind and visually impaired participants who learned a tactile map. Twelve blind and visually impaired participants and forty-eight sighted participants learned either a map (map condition) or a list of place names (list condition) for either 10 minutes or 2 minutes and then heard a text describing places on the map/list. After a filled pause, participants were asked to recall information from the text and, in the map condition, to make a reconstruction of the map. Kulhavy’s original finding was replicated for sighted participants who studied the map/list for 10 minutes. However, sighted participants exposed to the map/list for 2 minutes and blind participants performed at the same level with both the map and with the list. In all cases, differences between conditions were small. Further analyses revealed that encoding of the map’s structure, a crucial variable in Kulhavy’s model, may not have been a major factor in determining recall of factual information.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel, R.R. and Kulhavy, R.W. (1986). Maps, mode of text presentation, and children’s prose learning. American Educational Research Journal 23:263–274.
Andrews, S.K. (1983). Spatial cognition through tactual maps. In Proceedings of the 1st international symposium on maps and graphics for the visually handicapped. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
Bentzen, B.L. (1982). Tangible graphic displays in the education of the blind persons. In W. Schiff and E. Foulke (Eds), Tactual perception: A sourcebook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Blades, M., Ungar, S. and Spencer, C. (in press). Map using by adults with visual impairments. Professional Geographer.
Carpenter, P.A. and Eisenberg, P. (1978). Mental rotation and frame of reference in blind and sighted individuals. Perception and Psychophysics 23:117–124.
Dodds, A. (1983). Mental rotation and visual imagery. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 77:16–20.
Dodds, A. (1988). Tactile maps and the blind user: Perceptual, cognitive and behavioural factors. In Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on tactile maps and graphics for visually impaired people. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.
Ernest, C.H. (1987). Imagery and memory in the blind: A review. In McDaniel and Pressley (Eds), Imagery and related processes. New York: Springer.
Espinosa, M-A., Ungar, S., Ochata, E., Blades, M. and Spencer, C. (1998). Comparing methods for introducing blind and visually impaired people to unfamiliar urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 18:277–287.
Farah, M. (1984). The neurological basis of mental imagery: A componential analysis. Cognition 18:245–272.
Hampson, P.J. and Daly, C.M. (1989). Individual variation in tactile map reading skills: some guidelines for research. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 83:505–509.
Heller, M.A. (1991). Haptic perception in blind people. In M. Heller and W. Schiff (Eds), The psychology of touch. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Juurmaa, J. (1973). Transposition in mental spatial manipulation: A theoretical analysis. American Foundation for the Blind Research Bulletin 26:87–134.
Kerr, N.H. (1983). The role of vision in “visual imagery” experiments: Evidence from the congenitally blind. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 112:265–277.
Kulhavy, R.W., Lee, J.B. and Caterino, L.C. (1985). Conjoint retention of maps and related discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology 10:28–37.
Kulhavy, R.W. and Stock, W.A. (1996). How cognitive maps are learned and remembered. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 86:123–145.
Kulhavy, R.W., Stock, W.A. and Kealy, W.A. (1993). How geographic maps increase recall of instructional text. Educational Technology Research and Development 41:47–62.
Kulhavy, R.W., Stock, W.A., Verdi, M.P., Rittschof, K.A. and Savenye, W. (1993). Why maps improve memory for text: The influence of structural information on working memory operations. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 5:375–392.
Kulhavy, R.W., Woodward, K.A., Haygood, R.C. and Webb, J.M. (1993c). Using maps to remember text: An instructional analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology 63:161–169.
Landau, B. (1986). Early map use as an unlearned ability. Cognition 22:201223.
Marmor, G.S. and Zaback, L.A. (1976). Mental rotation by the blind: Does mental rotation depend on visual imagery? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2:515–521.
Millar, S. (1994). Understanding and representing space: Theory and evidence from studies with blind and sighted children. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paivio (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Röder, B., Rösler, F., Heilund, M. and Hennighausen, E. (1993). Haptic mental rotation tasks performed by blind and sighted individuals. Zeitschrift Für Experimentelle and Angewandte Psychologie 40:154–177.
Schwartz, N.H. and Kulhavy, R.W. (1981). Map features and the recall of discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology 6:151–158.
Senden, S.M.v. (1932). Space and sight: The perception of space and shape in the congenitally blind before and after operation. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Stock, W.A., Kulhavy, R.W., Peterson, S.E., Hancock, T.E. and Verdi, M.P. (1995). Mental representations of maps and verbal descriptions: Evidence they may affect text memory differently. Contemporary Educational Psychology 20:237–256.
Tippett, L.J. (1992). The generation of visual images: A review of neuropsychological research and theory. Psychological Bulletin 112:415–432.
Ungar, S. (in press). Cognitive mapping without visual experience. In R. Kitchin and S. Freundschuh (Eds), Cognitive mapping: Past, present and future. London: Routledge.
Ungar, S., Blades, M., Spencer, C. and Morsley, K. (1994). Can visually impaired children use tactile maps to estimate directions? Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 88:221–233.
Ungar, S.J., Blades, M. and Spencer, C. (1995). Mental rotation of a tactile layout by young visually impaired children. Perception 24:891–900.
Ungar, S., Blades, M. and Spencer, C. (1996). The construction of cognitive maps by children with visual impairments. In J. Portugali (Ed.), The construction of cognitive maps. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ungar, S., Espinosa, A., Blades, M., Ochata, E. and Spencer, C. (1997). Use of tactile maps by blind and visually impaired people. Cartographic Perspectives 28:4–12.
Ungar, S., Blades, M. and Spencer, C. (1997). Strategies for knowledge acquisition from cartographic maps by blind and visually impaired adults. Cartographic Journal 34:93–110.
Warren, D.H. (1984). Blindness and early childhood development. New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
Winn, W. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review 3:211–247.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ungar, S., Blades, M., Spencer, C. (2002). Tactile Maps and a Test of the Conjoint Retention Hypothesis. In: Anderson, M., Meyer, B., Olivier, P. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0109-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0109-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-242-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0109-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive