Skip to main content

Abstract

We argue that the use of a user-centred design approach necessarily involves some form of story telling or narrative. Given that both the potential end-users and the designers themselves often (perhaps usually) have different interests and points-of-view to present, the resultant co-constructed narrative describing the desired interactive system is inevitably the product ofcompromise. We describe how such an unwanted compromise can arise and how the process by which it arose can be unpicked using Bakhtin’s approach to the analysis of narrative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, University of Texas Press. Edited by C. Emerson&M. Holquist, translated by V.W. McGee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bødker, S. & Grønbæk, K. (1998), Users and Designers in Mutual Activity, in Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work, Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bødker, S., Grønbæk, K. & Kyng, M. (1993), Cooperative Design: Techniques and Experiences from the Scandinavian Scene, in D. Schuler & A. Namioka (eds.), Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 157–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1986), Actual Minds, Possible Worlds, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1969), A Grammar of Motives, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. M. (1995), Introduction: The Scenario Perspective on System Development, in J. M. Carroll (ed.), Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development, John Wiley&Sons, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleridge, S. T. (1798), “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”. Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, E., Higgins, M. & Somerville, I. (2000), “Narrative of New Media in Scottish Households: The Evolution of a Framework of Inquiry”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(10), 900–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goguen, J. A. (1997), Toward a Social, Ethical Theory of Information, in G. C. Bowker, S. L. Star, W. Turner & L. Gasser (eds.), Social Science, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.27–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1984), Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology, Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzblatt, K. & Beyer, H. (1998), Contextual Design: Defining Customer-centred Systems, Morgan-Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imaz, M. & Benyon, D. (1999), How Stories Capure Interactions, in A. Sasse & C. Johnson (eds.), Human-Computer InteractionINTERACT’ 99: Proceedings of the Seventh IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, IOS Press, pp.321–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kensing, F. (1998), “Prompted Reflection: A Technique for Understanding Complex Work”, Interactions 1(1), 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, P. (2000), “Storytelling and the Development of Discourse in the Engineering Design Process”, Design Studies 21(4), 357–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moro, Y. (1999), The Expanded Dialogical Sphere: Writing Activity and Authoring of Self in Japanese Classrooms, in R. M. Y. Engeström & R.-L. Punämaki (eds.), Perspectives in Activity Theory, Cambridge University Press, pp. 165–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, M. (1993), PICTIVE: Democratizing the Dynamics of the Design Session, in D. Schuler & A. Namioka (eds.), Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.211–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentland, B. T. (1999), Narrative Methods in Collaborative Systems Research, in Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp.23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton, J. (1997), DSDM: Dynamic Systems Development Method, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991), Voices of the Mind, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J.V. (1998), Minds as Action, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Turner, P., Turner, S., McCall, R. (2001). Getting the Story Straight. In: Blandford, A., Vanderdonckt, J., Gray, P. (eds) People and Computers XV—Interaction without Frontiers. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0353-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0353-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-515-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0353-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics