Skip to main content

On the Refinement and Simulation of Data Types and Processes

  • Conference paper
Book cover IFM’99

Abstract

This paper presents a behavioural semantics for abstract data types, and thus a correspondence between data types and processes. The value of this correspondence lies in the fact that simulation of the abstract data types is easily verified, and is equivalent to failures refinement of the corresponding processes.

The method of constructing a semantics, and the method of proving equivalence between notions of refinement, are independent of the chosen interpretation. The same methods can be used to establish other correspondences between state-based and behavioural descriptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. J. R. Back and K. Sere. Stepwise refinement of action systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics of Program Construction, volume 375 of LNCS, pages 115–138. Springer, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. J. Butler. Refinement and decomposition of value-passing action systems. In E. Best, editor, Concurrency Theory (CONCUR ’93), volume 715 of LNCS. Springer-Verlag, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Duke, G. Rose, and G. Smith. Object Z: a specification language advocated for the description of standards. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 17:511–533, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Fischer. Combining CSP and Z. Technical report, University of Oldenburg, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Fischer. CSP-OZ: A combination of Object-Z and CSP. In H. Bowman and J. Derrick, editors, Formal Methods for Open Object-Based Distributed Systems (FMOODS ’97) volume 2, pages 423–438. Chapman and Hall, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Fischer. How to combine Z with a process algebra. In J. Bowen, A. Fett, and M. Hinchey, editors, Z Users’ meeting (ZUM ’98), volume 1493 of LNCS, pages 5 - 23. Springer-Verlag, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Fischer and G. Smith. Combining CSP and Object-Z: Finite or infinite trace semantics? In T. Higashino N. Shiratori and A. Togashi, editors, Proceedings of FORTE/PSTV’97, pages 503–518. Chapman and Hall, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. A. R. Hoare, J. He, and J. W. Sanders. Prespecification in data refinement. Information Processing Letters, 25(2):71–76, 1987.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. C. A. R. Hoare. Communicating Sequential Processes. Prentice Hall, 1985.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. A. W. Roscoe. The Theory and Practice of Concurrency. Prentice Hall, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. W. Roscoe, J. C. P. Woodcock, and L. Wulf. Non-interference through determinism. In D. Gollman, editor, ESORICS ’94, volume 875 of LNCS, pages 33–54. Springer-Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Smith and J. Derrick. Refinement and verification of concurrent systems specified in Object-Z and CSP. In First International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods (ICFEM’97), pages 293–302. IEEE Computer Press, 1997.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Smith. A semantic integration of Object-Z and CSP for the specification of concurrent systems. In J. Fitzgerald, C. B. Jones, and P. Lucas, editors, Formal Methods Europe (FME ’97), volume 1313 of LNCS, pages 62–81. Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. M. Spivey. The Z Notation: A Reference Manual. Prentice Hall, 2nd edition, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. C. P. Woodcock and J. Davies. Using Z: Specification, Proof and Refinement. Prentice Hall International Series in Computer Science, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. C. P. Woodcock and C. C. Morgan. Refinement of state-based concurrent systems. In VDM Symposium 1990, volume 428 of LNCS, pages 340–351. Springer-Verlag, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bolton, C., Davies, J., Woodcock, J. (1999). On the Refinement and Simulation of Data Types and Processes. In: Araki, K., Galloway, A., Taguchi, K. (eds) IFM’99. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0851-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0851-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-107-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0851-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics