Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Building a Case for Consonance

  • Conference paper
BIS ’99

Abstract

A number of theories and practices lean toward the importance of achieving agreement among various stakeholders and practices in organizations. Consonance is such a concept applied to systems development and allows likelihood of success to be measured at the start of a project rather than the conclusion. This paper reviews theory and preliminary studies that support the concept of consonance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adelman L., Evaluating Decision Support and Expert Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashford S.J. Self-Assessments in Organizations: A Literature Review and Integrative Model. In: Cummings L.L., Stow B.M. (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol. 11, 1989, pp. 133–174, JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bourgeois L.J. Performance and consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 1980, Vol. 1, pp. 227–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bozarth C.C., Berry W.L. Measuring the congruence between market requirements and manufacturing: a methodology and illustration. Decision Sciences, 1997, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 121 – 150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown S., Cron W.L., Slocum J. Jr. Effects of Trait Competitiveness and Perceived Interorganizational Competition on Salesperson Goal Setting and Performance. Forthcoming in the Journal of Marketing, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  6. Church A.H., Bracken D.W. Advancing the State of The Art of 360-Degree Feedback. Group & Organization Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, June 1997, pp. 149 – 161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. DeLone W.H., McLean E.R., Information Systems Success: The Quest for The Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 1992, Vol. 3, No. 1,, pp. 60–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Doll Wm.J., Torkzadeh G., Measurement of End-Use Computing Satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 12, June 1988, pp. 258 – 274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dos Santos B.L., Hawk S.R. Differences in Analyst’s Attitudes Towards Information Systems Development: Evidence and Implications. Information & Management, 1988, Vol. 14, pp. 31 – 41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Edwards J.R. The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: critique and a proposed alternative, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1994, Vol. 58, pp. 51 – 100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eisenhardt K.M. Agency theory: an assessment and review, Academy of Management Review, 1989, Vol. 14, No. 1, 57 – 74

    Google Scholar 

  12. Graf D., Misic M. The Changing Roles of the Systems Analysts. Information Resources Management Journal, Spring 1994, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 15 – 23

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gurbaxani V., Whang S. The impact of information systems on organizations and markets, Communications of the ACM, 1991, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 59 – 73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huarng A.S., System development effectiveness: an agency theory perspective, Information and Management, 1995, Vol. 28, pp. 283 – 291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ives B., Olson M. User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research. Management Science, Vol. 30, No. 5, 1982, pp. 19 – 29

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang J., Klein G User Perceptions of Evaluation Criteria for Three System Types. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, Summer 1996, pp. 63 – 69

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang J., Klein G., Balloun J. Perceptions of System Development Failures. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 39, No. 14–15, February 1998, pp. 933 – 937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang J., Klein G. Information System Project Selection Criteria Variations Within Strategic Classes. To appear in IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  19. Keil M., Escalation of commitment in information systems development: a comparison of three theories. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, pp. 348 – 352

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kerr J., Bettis R.A. Boards of Directors, Top Management, Compensation and Shareholder Return. Academy of Management Journal, 1987, Vol. 30, pp. 645 – 664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kettinger Wm.J., Lee Choong C. Perceived Service Quality and User Satisfaction with the Information Services Function. Decision Sciences, Sept—Dec. 1994, Vol. 25, No. 5 /6

    Google Scholar 

  22. Klein G., Jiang J., Sobol M. A New View of IS Personnel Performance Evaluation. To appear in Communications of the ACM

    Google Scholar 

  23. London M., Smither J.W. Can Multi-Source Feedback Change Perceptions of Goal Accomplishment, Self-Evaluation and Performance-Related Outcomes? Theory-Based Applications and Directions for Research. Personal Psychology, Winter 1995, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 803 – 839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. London M., Self and Interpersonal Insight: How People Learn About Themselves and Others in Organizations, New York, Oxford University Press, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  25. McCall M.W., Lombardo M.M. Off The Track: Why and How Successful Executives Get Derailed. 1983 (Tech Rept. #21). Greensboro, N.C.: Center for Creative Leadership

    Google Scholar 

  26. McCauley C., Lombardo M.M. Benchmarks: An Instrument for Diagnosing Managerial Strengths and Weaknesses. In: Clark K.E., Clark M.B. (eds.) Measures of Leadership, 1990, pp. 535–545. West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America

    Google Scholar 

  27. Milliman J., Von Glingow M.A., Nathan M. Organizational life cycles and strategic international human resource management in multinational companies: implications for congruence theory. Academy of Management Review, 1991, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 318 – 339

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nightingale D.V., Toulouse J. Toward a multilevel congruence theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1977, Vol. 22, pp. 264 – 280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sherman D. The Relationship between Factors in the Work Environment and Turnover Propensities Among Engineering and Technical Support Personnel. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, May 1986, Vol. EM-33, No. 2, pp. 72 – 78

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Vancouver J.B., Schmitt N.W. An exploratory examination of person-organization fit: organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology, 1991, Vol. 44, pp. 333 – 352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yammarino F.J., Atwater L.E. Understanding Self-Perception Accuracy: Implications for Human Resources Management. Human Resources Management, 1993, Vol. 32, pp. 231 – 247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zahedi F. Quality Information Systems. 1995, Danvers, MA: Boyd & Fraser

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Business and Administration, The University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, USA

    Gary Klein

  2. Department of Computer Information Systems, College of Administration and Business Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, USA

    James J. Jiang

  3. School of Business, The University of Texas of the Permian Basin, Odessa, USA

    Michael Boyd

Authors
  1. Gary Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James J. Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Boyd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, The Poznan University of Economics, Poland

    Witold Abramowicz (Professor) (Professor)

  2. Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Australia

    Maria E. Orlowska (Dsc, Professor) (Dsc, Professor)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Klein, G., Jiang, J.J., Boyd, M. (1999). Building a Case for Consonance. In: Abramowicz, W., Orlowska, M.E. (eds) BIS ’99. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0875-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0875-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-167-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0875-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation