Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper focuses on the problem of changing requirements and describes the development of criteria for assessing methods, processes, tools and techniques for requirements engineering and design for their ability to handle change. The approach taken is to identify change management problems and actions for dealing with change within our case studies, and from these identify issues and strategies on which to base the criteria. Three main strategies for achieving the goal of minimising the adverse impact of change and maximising the benefits of change are recognised: identifying change early in the lifecycle, facilitating the incorporation of change and reducing change. Assessment criteria are presented by which each of these strategies can be evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. Eason, Information Technology and Organisational Change, Taylor and Francis, London, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S.D.P. Harker, K.D. Eason and J.E. Dobson, “The Change and Evolution of Requirements as a Challenge to the Practice of Software Engineering”, in IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 266–272, San Diego, CA, IEEE, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B.P. Leintz and E.B. Swanson, Software Maintenance Management, Addison Wesley, Wokingham, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.D. McCracken and M.A. Jackson, “Lifecycle Concept Considered Harmful”, ACM Software Engineering Notes, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 29–32, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M.R. Strens and R.C. Sugden, “Criteria for the Assessment of Representation Methods as Vehicles for Handling Change”, in IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering of Computer Based Systems, Tucson, AZ, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Zave, “Classification of Research Efforts in Requirements Engineering”, in 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 214-216, York, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sugden, R.C., Strens, M.R., Dobson, J.E. (1996). Meeting the Challenge of Changing Requirements. In: Redmill, F., Anderson, T. (eds) Safety-Critical Systems: The Convergence of High Tech and Human Factors. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1480-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1480-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76009-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1480-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics