Skip to main content

Automatic Combination of Multiple Ranked Retrieval Systems

  • Conference paper
SIGIR ’94

Abstract

Retrieval performance can often be improved significantly by using a number of different retrieval algorithms and combining the results, in contrast to using just a single retrieval algorithm. This is because different retrieval algorithms, or retrieval experts, often emphasize different document and query features when determining relevance and therefore retrieve different sets of documents. However, it is unclear how the different experts are to be combined, in general, to yield a superior overall estimate. We propose a method by which the relevance estimates made by different experts can be automatically combined to result in superior retrieval performance. We apply the method to two expert combination tasks. The applications demonstrate that the method can identify high performance combinations of experts and also is a novel means for determining the combined effectiveness of experts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brian T. Bartell. Optimizing Ranking Functions: A Connectionist Approach to Adaptive Information Retrieval. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, The University of California, San Diego, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brian T. Bartell, Garrison W. Cottrell, and Richard K. Belew. Learning the optimal parameters in a ranked retrieval system using multi-query relevance feedback. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval,Las Vegas, 1994. in press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nicholas J. Belkin, C. Cool, W. Bruce Croft, and James P. Callan. Effect of multiple query representations on information retrieval system performance. In Proc. SIGIR 1993, pages 339–346, Pittsburgh, PA, June 1993.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. I. Borg and J. Lingoes. Multidimensional Similarity Structure Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Edward A. Fox, M. Prabhakar Koushik, Joseph Shaw, Russell Modlin, and Durgesh Rao. Combining evidence from multiple searches. In Donna K. Harman, editor, The First Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-1), pages 319–328, March 1993. NIST Special Publication 500–207.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Norbert Fuhr and Chris Buckley. A probabilistic learning approach for document indexing. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 9 (3): 223–248, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Michael Gordon. Probabilistic and genetic algorithms in document retrieval. Communications of the ACM, 31 (10), October 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Guttman. What is not what in statistics. The Statistician, 26: 81–107, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Donna Harman. Overview of the first Text REtrieval Conference. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR, pages 36–48, Pittsburgh, PA, June 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Katzer„M. J. McGill, J. A. Tessier, W. Frakes, and P. DasGupta. A study of the overlap among document representations. Information Technology: Research and Development, 1 (4): 261–274, Oct 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  11. David D. Lewis and W. Bruce Croft. Term clustering of syntactic phrases. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR, Brussels, Sept 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. William H. Press, Brian P. Flannery, Saul A. Teukolsky, and William T. Vetterling. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Saracevic and P. Kantor. A study of information seeking and retrieving. III. Searchers, searches, overlap. Journal of the ASIS, 39 (3): 197–216, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paul Thompson. A combination of expert opinion approach to probabilistic information retrieval, part 1: The conceptual model. Information Processing El Management, 26 (3): 371–382, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Paul Thompson. Description of the PRC CEO algorithm for TREC. In Donna K. Harman, editor, The First Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-1), pages 337–342, March 1993. NIST Special Publication 500–207.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Howard Turtle and W. Bruce Croft. Evaluation of an inference network-based retrieval model. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 9(3):187–222, july 1991

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. K. M. Wong, Y. J. Cai, and Y. Y. Yao. Computation of term associations by a neural network. In Proceedings of SIGIR, Pittsburgh, PA, June 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bartell, B.T., Cottrell, G.W., Belew, R.K. (1994). Automatic Combination of Multiple Ranked Retrieval Systems. In: Croft, B.W., van Rijsbergen, C.J. (eds) SIGIR ’94. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2099-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2099-5_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19889-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2099-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics