Skip to main content

The OODB Ownership Relationship

  • Conference paper
OOIS’94

Abstract

The notion of “ownership” is prevalent in many social, economic, and political activities. In this paper, we show that an “ownership” semantic relationship can be a powerful addition to the repertoire of object-oriented database (OODB) modeling primitives. The motivation for such a relationship is provided by example OODB schemata. Using these schemata and some (informal) legal definitions, the varied semantics of ownership are identified A formal ownership relationship is presented as an extension to an OODB data model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Anderson, W. Kumpf, and R. Kendrick. Business Law - Principles and cases. South-Western Publishing Co., Cincinnati, OH, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ronald J. Brachman. What IS-A is and isn’t: An analysis of taxonomic links in semantic networks. Computer, 16(10):30–36, October 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Gray, K. Kalkarni and N. Paton. Object-Oriented Databases: A Semantic Data Model Approach. Prentice Hall, 1992.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Halper. A Comprehensive Part Model and Graphical Schema Representation for Object-Oriented Databases. PhD thesis, CIS Department, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Halper, J. Geller, and Y. Perl. An OODB “part” relationship model. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 602–611, Baltimore, MD, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Halper, J. Geller, and Y. Perl. Value propagation in object- oriented database part hierarchies. In Proceedings of the 2nd Int’l. Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 606–614. Washington, DC, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Halper, J. Geller, Y. Perl, and E. J. Neuhold. A graphical schema representation forobject-oriented databases. In R. Cooper, editor, Interfaces to Database Systems, 282–307. Springer-Verlag, London, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Hammer and D. McLeod. The Semantic Data Model: a Modeling Mechanism for Database Applications. In Proc. of ACM SIGMOD, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Kim, N. Ballou, H.-T. Chou, and J. F. Garza. Features of the orion object-oriented database system. In W. Kim and F. H. Lochovsky, editors, Object-Oriented Concepts, Databases, and Applications. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Kim, E. Bertino, and J. Garza. Composite objects revisited. In Proc. of the 1989 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on the Management of Data Portland, Oregon, appeared as SIGMOD RECORD, pages 337–347, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Kifer, W. Kim, and Y. Sagiv. Querying object-oriented databases. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM SIGMOD Int’l Conf on Management of Data, 393–402, San Diego, California, June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clarence C. Moore. Business Law. The Bruce Publishing Company, USA, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. MacKellar and J. Peckham. Representing design objects in sorac: A data model with semantic objects, relationships and constraints. In Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Design, Pittsburgh, PA, June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. T. Nguyen and D. Rieu. Representing design objects. In AI in Design ‘91. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alan Snyder. Encapsulation and inheritance in object-oriented programming languages. In Proc. OOPSLA-86, 38–45, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Woelk, W. Kim, and W. Luther. An object-oriented approach to multimedia databases. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int’l Conf on Management of Data, 311–325, Washington, D.C., May 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. A. Woods. What’s in a link: Foundations for semantic networks. In D. G. Bobrow and A. M. Collins, editors, Representation and Understanding, 35–82. Academic Press, New York, NY, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yang, O., Geller, J., Perl, Y., Halper, M. (1995). The OODB Ownership Relationship. In: Patel, D., Sun, Y., Patel, S. (eds) OOIS’94. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3016-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3016-1_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19927-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3016-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics