Abstract
This paper investigates the effects of interface style on children’s domain learning and reflective thought. It argues that the educational deficiencies of Direct Manipulation (DM) interfaces are not necessarily caused by their “directness”, but by their directness towards objects rather than embedded educational concepts. This paper furthers our understanding of the DM metaphor in educational software by proposing a shift of approach from Direct Object Manipulation (DOM) to Direct Concept Manipulation (DCM). A number of pedagogical strategies for supporting the DCM metaphor are offered. Results reported from a study using three variations of an educational software application are used to support these points.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educationa; Psychology: A Cognitive View New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston
Forman, G. (1988). Making Intuitive Knowledge Explicit Through Future Technology. In G. Forman, & P. B. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the Computer Age. Hillsadale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Forman, G., & Pufall, P. B. (1988). Constructivism in the Computer Age: A Reconstructive Epilogue. In G. Forman, & P. B. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the Computer Age. Hillsadale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Golightly, D. (1996). Harnessing the Interface for Domain Learning. Proceedings of CHI ‘86: Conference Companion, 37–38.
Guttenplan, S. (Ed.) (1995). A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Basil Blackwell Ltd., UK.
Hayes, N. A., & Broadbent, D. E. (1988). Two models of learning of intreactive tasks. Cognition, 22, 249–275.
Hutchins, E. L, Hollan, J. D., & Norman, D. A. (1986). Direct Manipulation Interfaces. In D. A. Norman, & S. Draper (Eds.). User centered system design: New perspectives in human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Holst, S. J. (1996). Directing Learner Attention With Manipulation Styles. Proceedings of CHI ‘86: Conference Companion, 43–44.
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (1993). Research in Education: A Conceptual Introduction. New York: HarperColins College Publishers.
Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. (Eds.). User centered system design: New perspectives in human-computer interaction Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive Engineering. In D. A. Norman & S. Draper (Eds.). User centered system design: New perspectives in human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defining human attributes in the age of the machine. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn Cambridge University Press.
Polya, G. (1957). How to Solve It. Doubleday, New York.
Russell, D. S, & Bologna, E. M. (1982). Teaching Geometry with Tangrams. Arithmetic Teacher, 30 (2), 34–38.
Sedighian, K., & Klawe, M. M. (1996a). An interface strategy for promoting reflective cognition in children. Proceedings of CHI ‘86, Conference Companion: Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, 177–178.
Sedighian, K., & Klawe, M. M. (1996b). Super Tangrams: A child-centered approach to designing a computer supported mathematics learning environment. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Learning Sciences, Northwestern University, 490–495.
Sedighian, K. (1997). Challenge-driven learning: A model for children’s multimedia mathematics learning environments. To appear in Proceedings of ED-MEDIA `97: World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Calgary. Effect of Interface Style 357
Sedighian, K., & Westrom, M. (1997). Designing Interactive Educational Software for Children: Some Lessons Learned. Submitted to the DIS ‘87 Conference: Design of Interactive Systems. Amsterdam, Netherlands. August 1997.
Shneiderman, B. (1988). We Can Design Better User Interfaces: A Review of Human-Computer Interaction Styles. Ergonomics, 31 (5): 699–710.
Shneiderman, B. (1993). Direct Manipulation. In B. Shneiderman (Ed.), Sparks of Innovation in Human-Computer Interaction, Ablex Publ., NJ.
Svendsen, G. B. (1991). Influences of Interface Style on Problem Solving. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 35, 379–397.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.
Trudel, C. I., & Payne, 5. (1995). Reflection and goal management in exploratory learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 42, 307–339.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag London
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sedighian, K., Westrom, M. (1997). Direct Object Manipulation vs. Direct Concept Manipulation: Effect of Interface Style on Reflection and Domain Learning. In: Thimbleby, H., O’Conaill, B., Thomas, P.J. (eds) People and Computers XII. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3601-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3601-9_20
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76172-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3601-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive