Skip to main content

Usable Software and Its Attributes: A Synthesis of Software Quality, European Community Law and Human-Computer Interaction

  • Conference paper
People and Computers XIII

Abstract

Strategic managers and IS professionals who are responsible for specifying, acquiring and producing quality software products are not supported by the endless flow of new international standards, legislation and user requirements. In order to clarify the current situation for everybody concerned with software quality, and especially those interested in usability, there is a need for a new review and evaluation of the various strands that contribute to software quality. By way of review this paper recalls the original software quality factors which were defined twenty years ago by McCall et al. (1977) and presents a methodical analysis and synthesis of three modern strands which influence these factors. The three strands relate to software quality, statutory obligations and human-computer interaction. All three strands rely on well respected sources which include the European Council Directive on minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment (Council Directive, 1990), ISO 9241-10 (ISO, 1993) and ISO 9000-3 (ISO, 1997). This synthesis produces a new set of quality factors, and the paper provides a new perspective of software usability by showing that the external quality factors in this new set are the usability attributes of a software product. New attributes like suitability, adaptability, functionality, installability and safety are identified and other attributes like usability and integrity are clarified within the three strands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bevan, N. and Macleod, M. (1994), “Usability Measurement in Context”, Behaviour and Information Technology 13 (1–2), 132–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, B. (1978), Characteristics of Software Quality,Vol. 1 of TRW Series on Software Technology,North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive (1990), “Minimum Safety and Health Requirements for Work with Display Screen Equipment”, Official journal of the European Communities (90/270/EEC), L 156/14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, K. (1992), Quality Management for Software,NCC Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. and Beale, R. (1993), Human—Computer Interaction,Prentice—Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghezzi, C., Jazayeri, M. and Mandrioli, D. (1991), Fundamentals of Software Engineering,Prentice—Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb, R. and Tharp, A. (1991), “Users, a Software Usability Model and Product Evaluation”, Interacting with Computers 3 (2), 155–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HSE (1996), Working with VDUs,Health and Safety Executive Books. Booklet No. IND(G) 36(L).

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE (1983), “Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, IEEE Std 729–1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE (1989), “Standard for Software Quality Assurance Plans”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, IEEE Std 730–1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ince, D. (1994), ISO 9001 and Software Quality Assurance,McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1987), “ISO 9000 Intemational Standard. Quality Management and Quality Assurance Standards”. Intemational Organization for Standardization, Genève, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO ( 1991 a), “ISO 9000–3 International Standard. Quality Management and Quality Assurance Standards — Part 3: Guidelines for the Application of ISO 9001 to the Development, Supply and Maintenance of Software”. Intemational Organization for Standardization, Genève, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1991b), “ISO/IEC 9126 International Standard. Information Technology — Software Product Evaluation — Quality Characteristics and Guidelines for their Use”. International Organization for Standardization, Genève, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1993), “ISO/DIS 9241–10 Draft International Standard. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs). Part 10: Dialogue Principles.”. International Organization for Standardization, Genève, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1995), “ISO/DIS 9241–11 Draft International Standard. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs). Part 11: Guidance on Usability”. International Organization for Standardization, Genève, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1997), “ISO 9000–3 International Standard. Quality Management and Quality Assurance Standards — Part 3: Guidelines for the Application of ISO 9001:1994 to the Development, Supply, Installation and Maintenance of Computer Software”. International Organization for Standardization, Genève, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kan, S. (1995), Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering,Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirakowski, J. and Corbett, M. (1993), “SUMI: The Software Usability Measurement Inventory”, British Journal of Educational Psychology 24 (3), 210–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, J. A., Richards, P. K. and Walters, G. F. (1977), Factors in Software Quality, Vol. I-III, Rome Aid Defence Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1993), Usability Engineering,Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porteous, M., Kirakowski, J. and Corbett, M. (1993), SUMI Users Handbook, Human Factors Research Group, University College, Cork, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharpe, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S. and Carey, T. (1994), Human-Computer Interaction,Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravden, S. and Johnson, G. (1989), Evaluating Usability of Human-Computer Interfaces: A Practical Method,Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiterer, H. and Oppermann, R. (1993), “Evaluation of User Interfaces: EVADIS II — A Comprehensive Evaluation Approach”, Behaviour and Information Technology 12 (3), 137–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, W. (1994), Strategic Management and Information Systems: An Integrated Approach,Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B.(1992), Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human—Computer Interaction,second edition, Addison—Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallmtiller, E. (1994), Software Quality Assurance: A Quality Approach,Prentice—Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fitzpatrick, R., Higgins, C. (1998). Usable Software and Its Attributes: A Synthesis of Software Quality, European Community Law and Human-Computer Interaction. In: Johnson, H., Nigay, L., Roast, C. (eds) People and Computers XIII. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3605-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3605-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76261-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3605-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics