Skip to main content

Understanding a Task Model: An Experiment

  • Conference paper
People and Computers XIII

Abstract

The HCI community advocates task analysis as a useful technique for user requirements analysis and system design, and has shown that task models should be developed collaboratively with users. The question of the usability and readability of task models for end-users is therefore an important one. In addition, we were specifically interested in this question in the context of our current project, Isolde*. Isolde is an authoring tool for technical writers whose user interface relies heavily on a specific task notation, DIANE+. We undertook an empirical study aimed at testing the readability and usability of DIANE+. Two experimental tasks are performed by end-users with no previous exposure to task models. Results show that DIANE+ is largely readable but that its usability is somewhat more problematic. This can be attributed to the task description notation rather than to the concepts themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balbo, S. Lindley, C. (1997), Adaptation of a Task Analysis Methodology to the Design of a Decision Support System, in S. Howard, J. Hammond G. K. Lindgaard (eds.), Human–Computer Interaction — INTERACT’97: Proceedings of the Fifth IFIP Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, Chapman Hall, pp. 355–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthet, M.-F. (1988), Logiciels interactifs et ergonomie, modèles et méthodes de conception, Dunod Informatique Ed., Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. M. (1990), The Nurnberg Funnel: Designing Minimalist Instruction for Practical Computer Skill,MIT Press..

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel, D. (1987), “Statecharts: A Visual Formalism for Complex Systems”, Science of Computer Programming 8 (3), 231–74.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, A. F. Paris, C. L. (in preparation), Towards an Empirical Characterization of the Discourse of Software Instructions, Technical Report, ITRI, University of Brighton. See also Hartley, A.F. Paris, C.L. (1995) Drafter: French Corpus Analysis and Grammatical Description, WP14/WP15 Deliverable, Drafter Project IED4/1/5827, EPSRC grant number J19221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, H. R. Hix, D. (1990), “The UAN: A User-Oriented Representation for Direct Manipulation Interface Designs”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 8 (3), 181–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (1992), Human-Computer Interaction: Psychology, Task Analysis and Software Engineering,McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, K. Long, J. (1994), The MUSE Method for Usability Engineering,Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, S., Paris, C. Vander Linden, K. (1998), Towards Automatic Construction of Task Models from Object-Oriented Diagrams, in S. Chatty P. Dewan (eds.), Proceedings of the IFIP Working Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction 1998, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palanque, P. A., Bastide, R., Dourte, L. Sibertin-Blanc, C. (1993), Design of User-driven Interfaces Using Petri Nets and Objects, in C. Rolland, F. Bodart C. Cauvet (eds.), Proceedings of CAISE’93 (Conference on Advance Information System Engineering), Vol. 685 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, pp. 569–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, C. Vander Linden, K. (1996a), “DRAFTER: An Interactive Support Tool for Writing Multilingual Instructions”, IEEE Computer 29(7), 49–56. Special Issue on Interactive Natural Language Processing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, C. Vander Linden, K. (1996b), An Overview of On-Line Documentation and CASE Tools, Technical Report ITRI-95–16, ITRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, C., Vander Linden, K., Fischer, M., Hartley, A., Pemberton, L., Power, R. Scott, D. (1991), A Support Tool for Writing Multilingual Instructions, in Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’95), Morgan Kaufmann, pp.1398–404. Also available as ITRI report ITRI-95–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, L. (1996), Requirements from Technical Writing, Technical Report, ITRI. Sacerdoti, E. D. (1977), A Structure for Plans and Behaviour, Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scapin, D. Pierret-Golbreich, C. (1989), Toward a Method for Task Description: MAD, in Proceedings of Work with Display Units ‘89, Elsevier Science, pp. 371–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarby, J.-C. (1994), The Automatic Management of Human-Computer Dialogue and Contextual Help, in B. Blumenthal, J. Jornostaev C. Unger (eds.), Proceedings of EWHCI’94: The East-West International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thimbleby, H. Addison, M. (1996), “Intelligent Adaptive Assistance and Its Automatic Generation”, Interacting with Computers 8 (1), 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ozkan, N., Paris, C., Balbo, S. (1998). Understanding a Task Model: An Experiment. In: Johnson, H., Nigay, L., Roast, C. (eds) People and Computers XIII. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3605-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3605-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76261-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3605-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics