Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Pattern Recognition ((ACVPR))

  • 356 Accesses

Abstract

In many content-based retrieval systems, the user is asked to understand how the computer sees the world. An emerging trend is to try to have the computer understand how people see the world. However, understanding the world is a fundamental computer vision problem which has withstood decades of research. The critical aspect to these emerging methods is that they have modest ambitions. Petkovic [26] has called this finding “simple semantics.” From recent literature, this generally means finding computable image features which are correlated with visual concepts. The key distinction is that we are not trying to fully understand how human intelligence works. This would imply creating a general model for understanding all visual concepts. Instead, we are satisfied to find features which describe some small, but useful domains of visual concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boekee, D and Van der Lubbe, J, “Some Aspects of Error Bounds in Feature Selection”, Patt Recogn, 11, pp. 353–360, 1979.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Buijs, J and Lew, M, “Learning Visual Concepts”, ACM Multimedia’99, 2, pp. 5–8, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carson, C, Thomas, M, Belongie, S, Hellerstein, J, and Malik, J, “Blobworld: A System for Region-Based Image Indexing and Retrieval”, Proc. VISUAL’99, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 509-516, June, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, SF, Chen, W, and Sundaram, H, “Semantic Visual Templates — Linking Visual Features to Semantics”, IEEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing, Chicago, IL, October, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cover, T and Van Campenhout, J, “On the Possible Orderings in the Measurement Selection Problem”, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, 7, pp. 657–661, 1977.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Eakins, J, “Similarity Retrieval of Trademark Images”, IEEE Multimed, 5(2), pp. 53–63, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferri, F, Pudil, P, Hatef, M, and Kittler, J, “Comparative Study of Techniques for Large Scale Feature Selection”, Pattern Recognition in Practice IV, E. Gelsema and L Kanal, eds, pp. 403-413, Elsevier Science, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Flickner, M, Sawhney, H, Niblack, W, Ashley, J, Huang, Q, Dom, B, Gorkani, M, Hafner, J, Lee, D, Petkovic, D, Steele, D, and Yanker, P, “Query by Image and Video Content: The QBIC System”, Computer, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 23-32, September, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Forsyth, D, Malik, J, Fleck, M, Leung, T, Bregler, C, Carson, C, and Greenspan, H, “Finding Pictures of Objects in Large Collections of Images”, International Workshop on Object Recognition, Cambridge, April, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fung, C and Loe, K, “Learning Primitive and Scene Semantics of Images for Classification and Retrieval”, ACM Multimedia’99, Orlando, Part 2, pp. 9-12, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldberg, DE, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Gudivada, VN and Raghavan, VV, “Finding the Right Image, Content-Based Image Retrieval Systems”, Computer, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 18-62, September, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holland, J, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jain, A and Zongker, D, “Feature Selection: Evaluation, Application, and Small Sample Performance”, IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intel, 19(2), pp. 153–158, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kittler, J, “Une generalisation de quelques algorithmes sous-optimaux de recherche d’ensembles d’attributs”, Reconnaissance des Formes et Traitement des Images, Paris, pp. 678-686, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kullback, S, Information Theory and Statistics, Wiley, New York, 1959.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lew, M and Huijsmans, N, “Information Theory and Face Detection”, Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, Vienna, Austria, pp. 601-605, August 25-30, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lew, M and Huang, TS, “Optimal Supports for Image Matching”, IEEE Digital Signal Processing Workshop, Loen, Norway, pp. 251-254, September, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lew, M, Lempinen, K, and Huijsmans, DP, “Webcrawling Using Sketches”, VISUAL’97, San Diego, pp. 77-84, December, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis, P, “The Characteristic Selection Problem in Recognition Systems”, IRE Trans on Inform Theory, 8, pp. 171–178, 1962.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Marill, T and Green, DM, “On the Effectiveness of Receptors in Recognition Systems”, IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 9, pp. 11–17, 1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mao, J, Mohiuddin, K, and Jain, A, “Parsimonious Network Design and Feature Selection Through Node Pruning”, Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, Jerusalem, pp. 622-624, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Narendra, PM and Fukunaga, K, “A Branch and Bound Algorithm for Feature Subset Selection”, IEEE Trans Comput, 26, pp. 917–922, 1977.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Novovicova, J, Pudil, P, and Kittler, J, “Divergence Based Feature Selection for Multimodal Class Densities”, IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intel, 18(2), pp. 218–223, February, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pentland, A, Picard, R, and Sclaroff, S, “Photobook: Content-Based Manipulation of Image Databases”, Int J Computer Vision, 18, pp. 233–254, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Petkovic, D, “Challenges and Opportunities for Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision Research in Year 2000 and Beyond”, Int. Conf. on Image Analysis and Processing, September, Florence, 2, pp. 1–5, 1997.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Picard, R, “A Society of Models for Video and Image Libraries”, IBM Syst J, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pudil, P, Novovicova, J, and Kittler, J, “Automatic Machine Learning of Decision Rule for Classification Problems in Image Analysis”, BMVC’ 93, Fourth British Machine Vision Conf, Vol. 1, pp. 15–24, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pudil, P, Novovicova, J, and Kittler, J, “Floating Search Methods in Feature Selection” Patt Recogn Lett, pp. 1119-1125, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ratan, A, Maron, O, Grimson, W, and Perez, T, “A Framework for Learning Query Concepts in Image Classification”, IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Fort Collins, Colorado, pp. 423-431, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Raudys, S and Jain, A, “Small Sample Size Effects in Statistical Pattern Recognition: Recommendations for Practitioners”, IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell, 13, pp. 252–264, March, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rowley, H and Kanade, T, “Neural Network Based Face Detection”, IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell, 20, pp. 23–38, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sung, KK and Poggio, T, “Example-Based Learning for View-Based Human Face Detection”, IEEE Trans. Patt Anal Mach Intell, 20, pp. 39–51, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sebestyen, G, Decision Making Processes in Pattern Recognition, Macmillan, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Siedlecki, W and Sklansky, J, “A Note on Genetic Algorithms for Large-Scale Feature Selection”, Patt Recogn Lett, 10, pp. 335–347, 1989.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Stearns, S, “On Selecting Features for Pattern Classifiers”, Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, pp. 71-75, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vailaya, A, Jain, A, and Zhang, H, “On Image Classification: City vs. Landscape”, IEEE Workshop on Content-Based Access of Image and Video Libraries, Santa Barbara, June, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Whitney, A, “A Direct Method of Nonparametric Measurement Selection”, IEEE Trans Comput, 20, pp. 1100–1103, 1971.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lew, M.S. (2001). Feature Selection and Visual Learning. In: Lew, M.S. (eds) Principles of Visual Information Retrieval. Advances in Pattern Recognition. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3702-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3702-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-868-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3702-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics