Abstract
Perception during active touch essentially depends on the executed exploratory movements. Humans use different movement schemes to perceive different haptic properties, the so-called exploratory procedures (EPs). The stereotypically used EPs are normally superior to other EPs in perceiving the associated property and it has been speculated that the EPs are a means of maximising pickup of the relevant sensory information. However, EPs are not always executed identically as they vary in a number of ways. For instance, the peak force and the number of fingers used during exploration are not fixed. This chapter reviews existing findings on the exploratory movement strategies that humans use in softness perception and gives an overview on how different manners of exploration affect the performance in softness tasks. It is shown that observers adapt their movement strategies depending on variations of the stimulus value and the exact conditions of the exploratory task, and that different movement parameters, e.g. the peak exploratory forces, considerably affect performance. Overall, results suggest that humans adjust their exploratory strategies to achieve the highest levels of performance in softness discrimination.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ambrosi G, Bicchi A, Rossi DD, Scilingo EP (1999) The role of contact area spread rate in haptic discrimination of softness. In: Proceedings IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 305–310
Arzamarski R, Isenhower RW, Kay BA, Turvey MT, Michaels CF (2010) Effects of intention and learning on attention to information in dynamic touch. Atten Percept Psychophys 72:721–735
Bergmann Tiest WM, Kappers AML (2008) Kinesthetic and cutaneous contributions to the perception of compressibility. In: Ferre M (ed) Haptics: perception, devices and scenarios. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5024. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 255–264
Bicchi A, Scilingo E, Dente D, Sgambelluri N (2005) Tactile flow and haptic discrimination of softness in multi-point interaction with real and virtual objects. In: Barbagli F, Prattichizzo D, Salisbury K (eds) Series STAR: Springer tracts in advanced robotics, vol 18. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 165–176
Choi S, Walker L, Tan HZ, Crittenden S, Reifenberger R (2005) Force constancy and its effect on haptic perception of virtual surfaces. ACM Trans Appl Percept 2:89–105
Debats NB, van de Langenberg RW, Kingma I, Smeets JBJ, Beek PB (2010) Exploratory movements determine cue weighting in haptic length perception of handheld rods. J Neurophysiol 104:2821–2830
Di Luca M, Knorlein B, Ernst MO, Harders M (2011) Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception. Brain Res Bull 85(5):245–259
Drewing K, Kaim L (2009) Haptic shape perception from force and position signals varies with exploratory movement direction and the exploring finger. Atten Percept Psychophys 71:1174–1184
Drewing K (2012) After experience with the task humans actively optimize shape discrimination in touch by utilizing effects of exploratory movement direction. Acta Psychol 141:295–303
Drewing K, Lezkan A, Ludwig S (2011) Texture discrimination in active touch: effects of the extension of the exploration and their exploitation. In: Basodogan C, Choi S, Harders M, Jones L, Yokokohji Y (eds) Conference proceedings: IEEE World haptics conference 2011, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Catalog number CFP11365-USB, pp 215–220
Freyberger FKB, Färber B (2006) Compliance discrimination of deformable objects by squeezing with one and two fingers. Proceedings of eurohaptics, Paris, France, pp 271–276
Friedman RM, Hester KD, Green BG, LaMotte RH (2008) Magnitude estimation of softness. Exp Brain Res 191:133–142
Fujita K, Oyama Y (1999) Control strategies in human pinch motion to detect the hardness of an object. IEEE SMC ’99 Conference proceedings, vol 2
Gamzu E, Ahissar E (2001) Importance of temporal cues for tactile spatial-frequency discrimination. J Neurosci 21:7416–7427
Gibson JJ (1962) Observations on active touch. Psychol Rev 69:477–490
Kaim L, Drewing K (2008) Exploratory movement parameters vary with stimulus stiffness. In: Ferre M (ed) Haptics: perception, devices and scenarios. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5024. Springer: Heidelberg, pp 313–318
Kaim L, Drewing K (2011) Exploratory strategies in haptic softness discrimination are tuned to achieve high levels of task performance. IEEE Trans Haptics 4:242–252
Kaim L, Drewing K (2014) Haptic softness discrimination of deformable objects by pressing with one or three fingers (unpublished raw data)
Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ (1999) The haptic glance: a route to rapid object identification and manipulation. In: Gopher D, Koriat A (eds) Attention and performance XVII: cognitive regulation of performance: interaction of theory and application. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 165–196
Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Reed CL (1989) Haptic integration of object properties: texture, hardness, and planar contour. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15:45–57
LaMotte RH (2000) Softness discrimination with a tool. J Neurophysiol 83:1777–1786
Lawrence DA, Pao LY, Dougherty AM, Salada MA, Pavlou Y (2000) Rate-hardness: a new performance metric for haptic interfaces. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 16:357–371
Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (1987) Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition. Cogn Psychol 19:342–368
Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (1990) Haptic classification of common objects: knowledge-driven exploration. Cogn Psychol 22:421–459
Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (1993) Extracting object properties through haptic exploration. Acta Psychol 84:29–40
Nefs HT, Kappers AML, Koenderink JJ (2002) Frequency discrimination between and within line gratings by dynamic touch. Percept Psychophys 64:969–980
Nicholson LL, Maher CG, Adams RD (1998) Hand contact area, force applied and early non-linear stiffness (toe) in manual stiffness discrimination task. Manual Therapy 3:212–219
Riley MA, Wagman JB, Santana M, Carello C, Turvey MT (2002) Perceptual behavior: recurrence analysis of a haptic exploratory procedure. Perception 31:481–510
Saig A, Gordon G, Assa E, Arieli A, Ahissar E (2012) Motor-sensory confluence in tactile perception. J Neurosci 32(40):14022–14032
Srinivasan MA, LaMotte RH (1995) Tactual discrimination of softness. J Neurophysiol 73:88–101
Tan HZ, Durlach NI, Beauregard GL, Srinivasan MA (1995) Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: the role of force and work and cues. Percept Psychophys 57:495–510
Tan HZ, Durlach NI, Shao Y, Wei M (1993) Manual resolution of compliance when work and force cues are minimized. In: Kazerooni H, Colgate JE, Adelstein B (eds) Advances in robotics, mechatronics, and haptic interfaces, vol 49. ASME, New Orleans, pp. 99–104
[Wichmann and HillWichmann and Hill2001]bib33 Wichmann FA, Hill NJ (2001) The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling and goodness-of-fit. Percept Psychophys 63: 1293–1313
Acknowledgments
I wish to thank two anonymous reviewers and Alexandra Lezkan for their helpful criticisms, suggestions, and comments on an earlier draft, and Steven A. Cholewiak for native-speaker advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Drewing, K. (2014). Exploratory Movement Strategies in Softness Perception. In: Di Luca, M. (eds) Multisensory Softness. Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6533-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6533-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6532-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6533-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)