Skip to main content

Interaction Aesthetics and Ubiquitous Music

  • Chapter
Creativity in the Digital Age

Abstract

Two recent approaches to interaction design have good potential to address creative practice in everyday settings: interaction aesthetics and ubiquitous music. We discuss the theoretical and methodological issues raised by both perspectives and highlight the similarities and differences among the two approaches. Through the analysis of a series of experiments, a common theme emerges: relational properties may provide a useful target for creativity-oriented experimental work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 12.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pele Ehn (1988: 9) stated: “The research approach I advocated was action research together with trade unions, and here I was strongly influenced by Paulo Freire and his ‘pedagogy of the oppressed’ as well as by Kristen Nygaard and the work he was doing together with the Norwegian Metal Workers’ Union.”

References

  • Baer J, McKool SS (2009) Assessing creativity using the consensual assessment technique. In: Schreiner C (ed) Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education. Information Science Reference, Hershey, pp 65–77

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bardram E (2005) Activity-based computing: support for mobility and collaboration in ubiquitous computing. Pers Ubiquit Comput 9(5):312–322. doi:10.1007/s00779-004-0335-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bødker S, Klokmose CN (2011) The human-artifact model: an activity theoretical approach to artifact ecologies. Hum Comput Interact 26(4):315–371. doi:10.1080/07370024.2011.626709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botero A, Kommonen K-H, Marttila S (2010) Expanding design space: design-in-use activities and strategies. In: Durling D, Bousbaci R, Chen L-L, Gautier P, Poldma T, Roworth-Stokes S, Stolterman E (eds) Proceedings of the DRS 2010 conference: design and complexity. DRS, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown AR, Dillon SC (2007) Networked improvisational musical environments: learning through online collaborative music making. In: Finney J, Burnard P (eds) Teaching music in the digital age. Continuum International Publishing Group, London, pp 96–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan-Kinns N (2011) Annotating distributed scores for mutual engagement in daisyphone and beyond. Leon Music J 21:51–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnard P (2007) Reframing creativity and technology: promoting pedagogic change in music education. J Music Technol Educ 1(1):37–55. doi:10.1386/jmte.1.1.37/1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton W (2007) Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design. Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann, New York. ISBN 9780123740373

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan T, Johnson P (2006) Interaction in creative tasks. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 531–540. ISBN: 1-59593-372-7

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruijn O, Spence R (2008) A new framework for theory-based interaction design, applied to serendipitous information retrieval. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 15(1):5:1–5:38. doi:10.1145/1352782.1352787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiLiello TC, Houghton JD (2008) Creative potential and practised creativity: identifying untapped creativity in organizations. Creat Innov Manag 17:37–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00464.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Paolo EA, Rohde M, Jaegher HD (2010) Horizons for the enactive mind: values, social interaction, and play. In: Stewart JR, Gapenne O, Paolo EAD (eds) Enaction: toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 33–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaglestone B, Ford N, Holdridge P, Carter J, Upton C (2008) Cognitive styles and computer-based creativity support systems: two linked studies of electro-acoustic music composers. In: Kronland-Martinet R, Ystad S, Jensen K (eds) Computer music modeling and retrieval: sense of sounds. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 74–97. ISBN 978-3-540-85034-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehn P (1988) Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Arbetslivscentrum, Stockholm. ISBN 9789186158453

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores L, Miletto E, Pimenta M, Miranda E, Keller D (2010) Musical interaction patterns: communicating computer music knowledge in a multidisciplinary project. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on design of communication. ACM, New York, pp 199–206. ISBN 978-1-4503-0403-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores LV, Pimenta MS, Keller D (2014) Patterns of musical interaction with computing devices. Cadernos de Informática 8(2):68–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire P (1999) Pedagogy of Hope/Pedagogia da Esperança: Um Reencontro com a Pedagogia do Oprimido. Paz e Terra, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaver WW, Beaver J, Benford S (2003) Ambiguity as a resource for design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 2003). ACM, New York, pp 233–240. ISBN 1-58113-630-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston. ISBN 0898599598

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallnäs L, Redström J (2002) From use to presence: on the expressions and aesthetics of everyday computational things. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 9(2):106–124. doi:10.1145/513665.513668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummels C, Overbeeke K (2010) Special issue editorial: aesthetics of interaction. Int J Des 4(2):1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins E (2005) Material anchors for conceptual blends. J Pragmat 37:1555–1577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller D (2000) Compositional processes from an ecological perspective. Leonardo Music J 10:55–60. doi:10.1162/096112100570459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller D (2004) Paititi: a multimodal journey to El Dorado. Doctor in Musical Arts thesis. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller D (2012) Sonic ecologies. In: Brown AR (ed) Sound musicianship: understanding the crafts of music. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp 213–227. ISBN 978-1-4438-3912-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller D, Capasso A (2000) Social and perceptual processes in the installation the trade. Organ Sound 5(2):85–94. doi:10.1017/S1355771800002053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller D, Capasso A (2006) New concepts and techniques in eco-composition. Organ Sound 11(1):55–62. doi:10.1017/S1355771806000082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller D, Barreiro DL, Queiroz M, Pimenta MS (2010) Anchoring in ubiquitous musical activities. In: Proceedings of the international computer music conference. MPublishing, University of Michigan Library, Ann Arbor, pp 319–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller D, Flores LV, Pimenta MS, Capasso A, Tinajero P (2011a) Convergent trends toward ubiquitous music. J N Music R 40(3):265–276. doi:10.1080/09298215.2011.594514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller D, Lima MH, Pimenta MS, Queiroz M (2011b) Assessing musical creativity: material, procedural and contextual dimensions. In: Proceedings of the National Association of Music Research and Post-Graduation Congress – ANPPOM. ANPPOM, Uberlândia, pp 708–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller D, Ferreira da Silva E, Pinheiro da Silva F, Lima MH, Pimenta MS, Lazzarini V (2013) Everyday musical creativity: an exploratory study with vocal percussion (Criatividade musical cotidiana: Um estudo exploratório com sons vocais percussivos). In: Proceedings of the National Association of Music Research and Post-Graduation Congress – ANPPOM. ANPPOM, Natal

    Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev AN (1978) Activity, consciousness and personality. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. ISBN 0130035335

    Google Scholar 

  • Liikkanen LA, Laakso M, Björklund T (2011) Foundations for studying creative design practices. In: Proceedings of the second conference on creativity and innovation in design (DESIRE ’11). ACM, New York, pp 309–315. ISBN 978-1-4503-0754-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima MH, Keller D, Pimenta MS, Lazzarini V, Miletto EM (2012) Creativity-centred design for ubiquitous musical activities: two case studies. J Music Technol Educ 5(2):195–222. doi:10.1386/jmte.5.2.195_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima MH, Keller D, Otero N, Pimenta MS, Lazzarini V, Johann M, Costalonga L (2014) Ecocompositional techniques in ubiquitous music practices in educational settings: sonic sketching. In: Himonides E, King A (eds) Proceedings of the Sempre (MET2014). Researching music, education, technology: critical insights. University of London, London, pp 123–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Loi D, Dillon P (2006) Adaptive educational environments as creative spaces. Camb J Educ 36(3):363–381. doi:10.1080/03057640600865959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löwgren J (2009) Toward an articulation of interaction esthetics. N Rev Hypermed Multimed 15(2):129–146. doi:10.1080/13614560903117822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miletto EM, Pimenta MS, Bouchet F, Sansonnet J-P, Keller D (2011) Principles for music creation by novices in networked music environments. J N Music Res 40(3):205–216. doi:10.1080/09298215.2011.603832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell WJ, Inouye AS, Blumenthal MS (2003) Beyond productivity: information technology, innovation, and creativity. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford MD, Hester K, Robledo I (2011) Methods in creativity research: multiple approaches, multiple methods. In: Mumford MD (ed) Handbook of organizational creativity. Elsevier Science, Waltham, pp 39–64. ISBN 9780080879109

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordmark S, Milrad M (2012) Mobile digital storytelling for promoting creative collaborative learning. In: Proceedings of the seventh IEEE international conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (WMUTE 2012). IEEE, Takamatsu, Japan, pp 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimenta MS, Miletto EM, Keller D, Flores LV (2012) Technological support for online communities focusing on music creation: adopting collaboration, flexibility and multiculturality from Brazilian creativity styles. In: Azab NA (ed) Cases on Web 2.0 in developing countries: studies on implementation, application and use. IGI Global Press, Vancouver. ISBN 1466625155

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro da Silva F, Keller D, Ferreira da Silva E, Pimenta MS, Lazzarini V (2013) Everyday musical creativity: exploratory study of ubiquitous musical activities (Criatividade musical cotidiana: Estudo exploratório de atividades musicais ubíquas). Música Hodie 13:64–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro da Silva F, Pimenta MS, Lazzarini V, Keller D (2014) Time tagging in its niche: engagement, explorability and creative attention (A marcação temporal no seu nicho: Engajamento, explorabilidade e atenção criativa). Cadernos de Informática 8(2):45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Radanovitsck EAA, Keller D, Flores LV, Pimenta MS, Queiroz M (2011) mixDroid: time tagging for creative activities (mixDroid: Marcação temporal para atividades criativas). In: Proceedings of the XIII Brazilian symposium on computer music (SBCM). SBC, Vitória

    Google Scholar 

  • Redström J (2007) Aesthetic concerns. In: Giaglis G, Kourouthanassis P (eds) Pervasive information systems. M.E. Sharpe Inc., Armonk, pp 197–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards R, Kinney D, Benet M, Merzel A (1988) Assessing everyday creativity: characteristics of the lifetime creativity scales and validation with three large samples. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:476–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco MA (2007) A hierarchical framework for the study of creativity. New Horiz Educ 55(3):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer P (1977) Traité des objets musicaux: Essai interdisciplines. Éditions du Seuil, Paris. ISBN 9782020026086

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer RM (1977) The tuning of the world. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Serafin S, Franinović K, Hermann T, Lemaitre G, Rinott M, Rocchesso D (2011) Sonic interaction design. In: Hermann T, Hunt A, Neuhoff JG (eds) The sonification handbook. Logos Publishing House, Berlin, pp 87–110. ISBN 978-3-8325-2819-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman B (2007) Creativity support tools: accelerating discovery and innovation. Commun ACM 50(12):20–32. doi:10.1145/1323688.1323689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolterman E (2008) The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. Int J Des [Online] 2(1):55–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Truax B (2002) Genres and techniques of soundscape composition as developed at Simon Fraser University. Organ Sound 7(1):5–14. doi:10.1017/S1355771802001024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udsen LE, Jørgensen AH (2005) The aesthetic turn: unravelling recent aesthetic approaches to human-computer interaction. Digit Creat 16:205–216. doi:10.1080/14626260500476564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright P, Wallace J, McCarthy J (2008) Aesthetics and experience-centered design. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 15(4):1–21. doi:10.1145/1460355.1460360

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damián Keller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keller, D. et al. (2015). Interaction Aesthetics and Ubiquitous Music. In: Zagalo, N., Branco, P. (eds) Creativity in the Digital Age. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6681-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6681-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6680-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6681-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics