Skip to main content

Practice-Based Computing: Empirically Grounded Conceptualizations Derived from Design Case Studies

  • Chapter
Book cover Designing Socially Embedded Technologies in the Real-World

Abstract

The introduction of IT has changed the way we live in many ways. Historically, it can even be argued that socially embedded applications of information technology challenge and change practices to an extent rarely seen before with any other type of technological artifacts. If these IT artifacts have strong and recurrent impacts on people’s lives, we need to reconsider design practice artifacts which allow for anticipating use practices and bring together inspirational creativity with evaluative methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bentley, R., Hughes, J. A., Randall, D., Rodden, T., Sawyer, P., Shapiro, D., & Somerville, I. (1992). Ethnographically-informed systems design for air traffic control. In Proceedings of CSCW ’92: sharing perspectives (November 2–4, Toronto, Canada) (pp. 123–129). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg, J., Suchman, L., & Trigg, R. (1996). Reflections on a work-oriented design project. Human-Computer Interaction, 11(3), 237–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1954). What’s wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 1954, 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braa, K., & Vidgen, R. (1999). Interpretation, intervention, and reduction in the organizational laboratory: A framework for in-context information system research. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 9, 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brödner, P., Rohde, M., Stevens, G., Betz, M., & Wulf, V. (2015). Grounded design – A praxeological IS research perspective (Submitted for publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, E., Czerwinski, M., Millen, D., Randall, D., Stevens, G., Wulf, V., & Zimmermann, J. (2011). Transferability of research findings: Context-dependent or model-driven. CHI extended abstracts (pp. 651–654). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, A. (1998). Ethnography in participatory design. In Proceedings of the PDC’98 (pp. 93–105). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dachtera, J., Randall, D., & Wulf, V. (2014). Research on research: Design research at the margins: Academia, industry and end-users. In Proceedings of ACM conference on computer human interaction (CHI 2014) (pp. 713–722). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Disalvo, C., Clement, A., & Pipek, V. (2012). Communities: Participatory design for, with, and by communities. In J. Simonsen & T. Robertson (Eds.), International handbook of participatory design (pp. 182–209). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich, Y. (2014). Software engineering beyond the project – Sustaining software ecosystems. Information and Software Technology, 56, 1436–1456. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2014.02.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, C. (2010). Tailoring software infrastructures: Integration of end-user development and service-oriented architectures. Eul: Josef Eul Verlag GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P. (2006). Implications for design. In Proceedings of ACM conference human factors in computing systems CHI 2006 (Montreal, Canada) (pp. 541–550). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draxler, S., Stevens, G., & Boden, A. (2015). Keeping the development environment up to date – A study of the situated practices of appropriating the eclipse IDE. In IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. IEEE explore (online resource).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehn, P. (2008, October 01–04). Participation in design things. In Proceedings of the tenth anniversary conference on participatory design 2008 (pp. 92–101). Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, G., Balaam, M., Axelrod, L., Harris, E., McAllister, G., et al. (2010). Designing for Rehabilitation at Home. In Proceedings of workshop on Interactive Systems in Healthcare, Atlanta April (2010) (pp. 49–52). Workshop Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, C., Reisin F.-M., & Schmidt G. (1989). STEPS to software development with users. In 2nd European conference on software engineering (ESEC’89), Coventry, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, C., Mehl, W.-M., Resin, F.-M., Schmidt, G., & Wolf, G. (1991). Out of Scandinavia: Alternative approaches to software design and system development. Human–Computer Interaction, 4(4), 253–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forlizzi, J. (2008). The product ecology: Understanding social product use and supporting design culture. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. (1998). Situation-oriented support of group awareness in CSCW systems. PhD Thesis, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Essen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L., Sohlenkamp, M., Genau, A., Pfeifer, A., Kahler, H., & Wulf, V. (1996). Transparenz in kooperativen Prozessen – Der Ereignisdienst in POLITeam. In H. Krcmar, H. Lewe, G. Schwabe (Hrsg.) Herausforderung Telekooperation (Proceedings der DCSCW’96, 30.9. – 2.10.1996 in Stuttgart-Hohenheim) (pp. 3–16). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W. (2012). What should we expect from research through design? In Proceedings of ACM conference on computer human interaction (CHI 2012) (pp. 937–946). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, J., & Kyng, M. (Eds.). (1991). Design at work – Cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth, O., & Lundberg, N. (2001). Designing work oriented infrastructures. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 10(3–4), 347–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E., & Hatling, M. (1996). Developing information infrastructure: The tension between standardization and flexibility. Science, Technology & Human Values, 21(4), 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1991). Collaborative activity and technological design: Task coordination in London underground control rooms. In Proceedings of the second European conference on computer supported cooperative work (ECSCW 1991) (pp. 65–80). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A., & Kyng, M. (1991). There’s no place like home: Continuing design in use. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work – Cooperative design of computer artifacts (pp. 219–240). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A., & Chatterjee, S. (2010). Design research in information systems. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A. R., March, S. G., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in: Information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, J., Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2005). Context grabbing: Assigning metadata in large document collections. In Proceedings of the ninth European conference on computer supported cooperative work (ECSCW 2005) (pp. 367–386). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. A., Randall, D., & Shapiro, D. (1992). Faltering from ethnography to design. In Proceedings of CSCW ’92: sharing perspectives (November 2–4, Toronto, Canada) (pp. 115–122). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T., & Anderson, H. (1995). The role of ethnography in interactive systems design. Interactions, 2(2), 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huysman, M., & Wulf, V. (Eds.). (2004). Social capital and information technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysman, M., & Wulf, V. (2006). IT to support knowledge sharing in communities: Towards a social capital analysis. Journal of Information Technology (JIT), 21(1), 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasti, H. (2001). Bridging work practice and system design: Integrating systemic analysis, appreciative intervention and practitioner participation. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 10(2), 211–246. doi:10.1023/A:1011239126617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasti, H., & Baker, K. S. (2004). Infrastructuring for the long-term: Ecological information management. In Proceedings of the 37th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2004. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265077.

  • Karasti, H., & Syrjänen, A.-L. (2004). Artful infrastructuring in two cases of community PD. In Proceedings of the eighth conference on participatory design: Artful integration: Interweaving media, materials and practices (pp. 20–30). doi:10.1145/1011870.1011874.

  • Karsten, H., & Jones, M. (1998). The long and winding road: Collaborative IT and organisational change. In International conference on computer supported work (CSCW’98). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kensing, F., Simonsen, J., & Bodker, K. (1998). MUST: A method for participatory design. Human–Computer Interaction, 13(2), 167–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuutti, K., & Bannon, L. J. (2014). The turn to practice in HCI: Towards a research agenda. In Proceedings of CHI ’14 (pp. 3543–3552). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampson, B. (1974). Protection. ACM Operating Systems Review, 8, 18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley, B., Pipek, V., Reuter, C., & Wiedenhoefer, T. (2012). Supporting improvisation work in inter-organizational crisis management. In Proceedings of ACM conference on computer human interaction (CHI 2012) (pp. 1529–1538). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malanowski, N., Özcivelek, R., & Cabrera, M. (2008). Active ageing and independent living services: The role of information and communication technology. JRC41496. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiassen, L. (2002). Collaborative practice research. Information Technology & People, 15(4), 321–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millen, D. R. (2000). Rapid ethnography: Time deepening strategies for HCI field research. In Proceedings of the DIS ‘00 (pp. 280–286). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, C., Wan, L., & Hrg, D. (2010). Dealing with wandering: A case study on caregivers’ attitudes towards privacy and autonomy when reflecting the use of LBS. In Proceedings of GROUP conference 2010, November 7–10, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, C., Neufeldt, C., Randall, D., & Wulf, V. (2012, May 05–10). ICT-Development in residential care settings: Sensitizing design to the life circumstances of the residents of a care home. In Proceedings of ACM-CHI 2012. Austin: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, C., Wan, L., & Wulf, V. (2013, May 5–8). Dealing with wandering in institutional care: Exploring the field. In 7th international conference on pervasive computing technologies for healthcare (PervasiveHealth 2013) (pp. 101–104), Venice, Italy. Venice: EAI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngwenyama, O. K. (1998). Groupware, social action and organizational emergence: On the process dynamics of computer mediated distributed work. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 8(4), 123–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, D., & Purves, B. (2009). Decision-making, personhood and dementia: Exploring the interface. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogonowski, C., Ley, B., Hess, J., Wan, L., & Wulf, V. (2013). Designing for the living room: Long-term user involvement in a living lab. In Proceedings of ACM conference on computer human interaction (CHI 2013) (pp. 1539–1548). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1996a). Evolving with notes: Organizational change around groupware technology. In C. Ciborra (Ed.), Groupware & teamwork (pp. 23–60). Chichester et al.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1996b). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 63–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Hofman, J. D. (1997). An improvisational model for change management: The case of groupware technology. Sloan Management Review, (Winter), Cambridge, MIT, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipek, V. (2005). From tailoring to appropriation support: Negotiating groupware usage. Oulu: Faculty of Science, Department of Information Processing Science, University of Oulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (1999). A groupware’s life. In Proceedings of the sixth European conference on computer supported cooperative work (ECSCW ’99). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2003). Pruning the answer garden: Knowledge sharing in maintenance engineering. In Proceedings of the eighth European conference on computer supported cooperative work (ECSCW 2003) (pp. 1–20). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2009, May). Infrastructuring: Towards an integrated perspective on the design and use of information technology. Journal of the Association of Information System (JAIS), 10(5), 306–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, A. M., Campbell, R., & Hollan, J. D. (2010). Exploring the accessibility and appeal of surface computing for older adult health care support. In Proceeding of CHI 2010 (pp. 907–916). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez, L. (2012). Practice-centered support for indoor navigation: Design of a ubicomp platform for firefighters, PhD thesis, Fakultät III Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Wirtschaftsinformatik und Wirtschaftsrecht, University of Siegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, L., Betz, M., Dyrks, T., Scholz, M., Gerwinski, J., & Wulf, V. (2012). Landmarke – An ad hoc deployable ubicomp infrastructure to support indoor navigation of firefighters. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (PUC), 16(8), 1025–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichling, T., & Veith, M. (2005). Expertise sharing in a heterogeneous organizational environment. In Proceedings of the ninth European conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 325–345). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichling, T., & Wulf, V. (2009). Expert recommender systems in practice: Evaluating semi-automatic profile generation. In Proceedings of ACM conference on computer human interaction (CHI 2009) (pp. 59–68). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichling, T., Schubert, K., & Wulf, V. (2005). Matching human actors based on their texts: Design and evaluation of an instance of the expert finding framework. In Proceedings of GROUP 2005 (pp. 61–70). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichling, T., Veith, M., & Wulf, V. (2007). Expert recommender: Designing for a network organization. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing (JCSCW), 16(4–5), 431–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, M. (2007). Integrated organization and technology development (OTD) and the impact of socio-cultural concepts – A CSCW perspective. Datalogiske skrifter, University of Roskilde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, M., Stevens, G., Brödner, P., & Wulf, V. (2009). Towards a paradigmatic shift in IS: Designing for social practice. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on design science research in information systems and technology (DESRIST 2009). New York: ACM Press, Article 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saeed, S., Rohde, M., & Wulf, V. (2011). Analyzing political activists’ organization practices: Findings from a long term case study of the European social forum. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing (JCSCW), 20(4–5), 265–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. (2011). Cooperative work and coordinative practices. Contributions to the Conceptual Foundations of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), London u.a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2012). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, H., & Dewan, P. (1992). Access control for collaborative environments. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW 2002) (pp. 51–58). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Bowker, G. C. (2002). How to infrastructure. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media – Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 151–162). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G., & Wulf, V. (2002). A new dimension in access control: Studying maintenance engineering across organizational boundaries. In Proceedings of ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (CSCW 2002) (pp. 196–205). New York: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G., & Wulf, V. (2009). Computer-supported access control. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction (ToCHI), 16(3), Article 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiemerling, O., & Wulf, V. (2000). Beyond “Yes and No” – Extending access control in groupware with awareness and negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 9(2000), 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiemerling, O., Wulf, V., & Rohde, M. (1998). Integrated organization and technology development – The case of the OrgTech-Project. In: Proceedings of concurrent engineering (CE 98) (181–187), July, 13–15, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolterman, E. (2008). The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1986). Plans and situated action: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (2002). Located accountabilities in technology production. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 14(2), 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L., Blomberg, J., Orr, J. E., & Trigg, R. (1999). Reconstructing technologies as social practice. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 392–408. doi:10.1177/00027649921955335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, M. S., & Sokoler, T. (2008). Ticket-to-talk-television: Designing for the circumstantial nature of everyday social interaction. In Proceedings of NordiCHI 2008 (pp. S. 334–S. 343). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Törpel, B., Pipek, V., & Rittenbruch, M. (2003). Creating heterogeneity – Evolving use of groupware in a network of freelancers. Special issue on evolving use of froupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing (JCSCW), 12(1–2), 381–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., & Budgen, D. (2010). Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 52(5), 463–479. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.005.

  • Twidale, M. B. (2005). Over the shoulder learning: Supporting brief informal learning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 14(6), 505–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, L., Müller, C., Wulf, V., & Randall, D. (2014). Addressing the subtleties in dementia care: Pre-study & evaluation of a GPS monitoring system. In Proceedings of ACM conference on computer human interaction (CHI 2014) (pp. 3987–3996). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (1991). Participatory action research. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, V. (1997). Konfliktmanagement bei Groupware, Vieweg, Braunschweig und Wiesbaden 1997, Zugleich: Dissertation Universität Dortmund 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, V. (1999). Evolving cooperation when introducing groupware – A self-organization perspective. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 6(2), 55–75.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, V. (2000). Exploration Environments: Supporting Users to Learn Groupware Functions. Interacting with Computers, 13(2), 265–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, V. (2009). Theorien sozialer Praktiken als zur Elemente zur Fundierung der Wirtschaftsinformatik. In J. Becker, H. Krcmar, & B. Niehaves (Hrsg.), Wissenschaftstheorie und Gestaltungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatik (pp. 211–224). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, V., & Rohde, M. (1995). Towards an integrated organization and technology development. In Proceedings DIS ‘95, symposium on designing interactive systems: Processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 55–65). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, V., & Rohde, M. (1996). Reducing conflicts in Groupware: Metafunctions and their empirical evaluation. International Journal on Behaviour and Information Technology, 15(6), 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, V., Pipek, P., & Pfeifer, A. (2001). Resolving function-based conflicts in groupware systems. AI and Society, 15, 233–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, V., Pipek, V., & Won, M. (2008). Component-based tailorability: Towards highly flexible software applications. International Journal on Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS), 66(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, V., Rohde, M., Pipek, V., & Stevens, G. (2011). Engaging with practices: Design case studies as a research framework in CSCW. In Proceedings of ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (CSCW 2011) (pp. 505–512). New York: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). An analysis and critique of research through design: Toward a formalization of a research approach. In ACMDIS 2010 (pp. 310–319). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volker Wulf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wulf, V., Müller, C., Pipek, V., Randall, D., Rohde, M., Stevens, G. (2015). Practice-Based Computing: Empirically Grounded Conceptualizations Derived from Design Case Studies. In: Wulf, V., Schmidt, K., Randall, D. (eds) Designing Socially Embedded Technologies in the Real-World. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6720-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6720-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6719-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6720-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics