Abstract
In this chapter, we discuss the Poseidon demonstrator: a demonstrator that integrates the individual research results of all partners of the Poseidon project. After describing how the Poseidon demonstrator was built, deployed, and operated, we will not only show many results obtained from the demonstrator in action, but also present our lessons-learned during the creation and usage of the Poseidon demonstrator. We conclude that a demonstrator not only increases the scientific value of the research results by ensuring reproducibility but also shows the relevance of the research results: they are compatible with each other and applicable in the application domain. Furthermore, a demonstrator generates more valuable feedback since the research results are clearly positioned in the application domain and better aligned with the experience and way-of-working of all stakeholders, both technical and non-technical.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
In fact, not only some components but also the communication with the database of some components, i.e., some of the arrows in Fig. 4.2, were generated.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
See for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion for more information on cold fusion and its rejection by the scientific community.
References
Doornbos R, van Loo S (eds) (2012) From scientific instrument to industrial machine. Coping with architectural stress in embedded systems. SpringerBriefs in electrical and computer engineering. Springer: Dordrecht/London
van Hage WR, Malaisé V, van Erp M, Schreiber G (2011) Linked open piracy. K-CAP 2011 Poster Session. http://www.few.vu.nl/~wrvhage/pdf/kcapPoster.pdf
Hamberg R, Verriet J (eds) (2012) Automation in warehouse development. Springer, London
Heemels M, Muller G (eds) (2006) Boderc: model-based design of high-tech systems. Embedded Systems Institute, Eindhoven
Janssens JHM, Hiemstra H, Postma EO (2010) Creating artificial vessel trajectories with Presto. In: 22nd Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2010), Luxembourg
van de Laar P, Punter T (eds) (2011) Views on evolvability of embedded systems. Embedded systems. Springer, Dordrecht/New York
Mathijssen R (ed) (2009) Trader: reliability of high-volume consumer products. Embedded Systems Institute, Eindhoven
Tretmans J (ed) (2007) Tangram: model-based integration and testing of complex high-tech systems. Embedded Systems Institute, Eindhoven
van Engelen R, Voeten J (eds) (2007) Ideals: evolvability of software-intensive high-tech systems. Embedded Systems Institute, Eindhoven
Acknowledgements
This research has been carried out as a part of the Poseidon project at Thales under the responsibilities of the Embedded Systems Institute (ESI). This project is partially supported by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs under the BSIK program.
We would like to thank all industrial and academic partners of the Poseidon project for their efforts to realize the Poseidon demonstrator. We would like to thank Hester van Ouwerkerk, Teade Punter, Jan Tretmans, Michael Borth, and Dave Watts for their useful feedback on an earlier version of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van de Laar, P. (2013). The POSEIDON Demonstrator. In: van de Laar, P., Tretmans, J., Borth, M. (eds) Situation Awareness with Systems of Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6230-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6230-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6229-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6230-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)