Skip to main content

A Risk Integrated Methodology for Project Planning Under Uncertainty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Essays in Production, Project Planning and Scheduling

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 200))

Abstract

In this chapter we describe a risk integrated methodology for tactical and operational project planning under uncertainty. The methodology integrates quantitative risk analysis with reliable proactive/reactive project scheduling procedures. The integrated methodology relies on an iterative two-phase process. In phase 1 we determine the number of regular renewable resource units to be allocated to the project and the so-called internal project due date. Phase 2 implements a proactive/reactive schedule generation methodology. The proactive schedule to be used as a guideline during actual project execution is itself generated using a two-step procedure. In the first step, a precedence and resource feasible project schedule is constructed with acceptable project makespan. In a second step, the schedule is protected against disruptions that may occur during the execution of the project through the insertion of resource and/or time buffers into the schedule. A sufficient number of schedule executions are then simulated using the quantitative risk analysis information about possible resource breakdowns and the variability of activity durations. When the schedule becomes infeasible, it may be repaired by (a) preempting one or more of the active activities and rescheduling activities that are planned in the future but are affected by the preemption through precedence relations or the use of shared resources, or (b) by hiring irregular renewable resource capacity at an additional irregular capacity cost. The mean-variance function of the schedule execution costs may then used to evaluate the chosen resource and internal due date decisions made in phase 1. The final proactive schedule can then be deployed as a baseline during actual project execution in combination with a workable reactive scheduling procedure to be invoked when, despite the built-in protection, the baseline schedule becomes infeasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chapman, C., & Ward, S. (1997). Project risk management—Processes, techniques and insights. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, S., Demeulemeester, E., & Van de Vonder, S. (2010). A new approach for quantitative risk analysis, Research Report KBI 1029, Department of Decision Sciences and Information Management, K.U.Leuven, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deblaere, F., Demeulemeester, E., & Herroelen, W. (2011). Reactive scheduling in the multi-mode RCPSP. Computers & Operations Research, 38(1), 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeulemeester, E., Deblaere, F., Herbots, J., Lambrechts, O., & Van de Vonder, S. (2007). A multi-level approach to project management under uncertainty. Tijdschrift voor Economie en Management, LII(3), 391–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeulemeester, E., & Herroelen, W. (2002). Project scheduling—A research handbook. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeulemeester, E., & Herroelen, W. (2010). Robust project scheduling. Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management, 3(3-4), 201–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmaghraby, S. E. E. (1977). Activity networks—Project planning and control by network models. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gather, T., Zimmermann, J., & Bartels, J. H. (2010). Exact methods for the resource leveling problem. Journal of Scheduling, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagstrom, J. N. (1988). Computational complexity of PERT problems. Networks, 18(2), 139–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, S., & Briskorn, D. (2010). A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herroelen, W. (2005). Project scheduling-Theory and practice. Production and Operations Management, 14, 413–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herroelen, W. (2007). Generating robust project baseline schedules. Tutorials In Operations Research-OR Tools and Applications: Glimpses of Future Technologies, Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS). Chapter, 7, 124–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herroelen, W., & Leus, R. (2005). Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials. European Journal of Operational Research, 165(2), 289–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulett, D. (2009). Practical schedule risk analysis. Farnham: Gower Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrechts, O. (2007). Robust project scheduling subject to resource breakdowns, Ph. D. thesis, K.U.Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrechts, O., Demeulemeester, E., & Herroelen, W. (2008). Proactive and reactive strategies for resource-constrained project scheduling with uncertain resource availabilities. Journal of Scheduling, 11(2), 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrechts, O., Demeulemeester, E., & Herroelen, W. (2011). Time-slack based techniques for robust project scheduling subject to resource uncertainty. Annals of Operations Research, 186(1), 443–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leus, R., & Herroelen, W. (2004). Stability and resource allocation in project planning. IIE Transactions, 36(7), 667–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leus, R., Hans, E., Herroelen, W., & Wullink, G. (2007). A hierarchical approach to multiproject planning under uncertainty. Omega, 35(5), 563–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, K., & Zimmermann, J. (2000). Procedures for resource leveling and net present value problems in project scheduling with temporal and resource constraints. European Journal of Operational Research, 127, 425–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • PMI (2008). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK®Guide), Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. (1983). Stochastic processes. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatteman, D., Herroelen, W., Boone, A., & Van de Vonder, S. (2008). A methodology of integrated risk management and proactive scheduling of construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(11), 885–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standish Group International, 2004, CHAOS Report in year 2004: CHAOS chronicles, http://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research.

  • Van de Vonder, S., Demeulemeester, E., & Herroelen, W. (2006). Proactive-reactive project scheduling trade-offs and procedures. In Jozefowska, J. & Weglarz, J. (Eds.), Perspectives in Modern Project Scheduling, Springer’s International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Chapter 2, 25–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vonder, S., Ballestin, F., Demeulemeester, E., & Herroelen, W. (2007). Heuristic procedures for reactive project scheduling. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 52(1), 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vonder, S., Demeulemeester, E., & Herroelen, W. (2008). Proactive heuristic procedures for robust project scheduling: An experimental analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(3), 723–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vonder, S., Creemers, S., & Meulyzer, E. (2010). Risicomanagement in de bouw, WTCB-IWT-K.U.Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We are much indebted to Olivier Lambrechts, who developed the tabu search procedure for optimizing the resource allocation and due date setting decisions and extensively experimented with the two-phase procedure (Lambrechts 2007). We also benefited from the insights developed during the two research projects on Risk Management in the Construction Industry I-II, sponsored by the Flemish Government Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Willy Herroelen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herroelen, W. (2014). A Risk Integrated Methodology for Project Planning Under Uncertainty. In: Pulat, P., Sarin, S., Uzsoy, R. (eds) Essays in Production, Project Planning and Scheduling. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 200. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9056-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics