Skip to main content

Forensic Use of Fingerprints and Fingermarks

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Biometrics

Introduction

The aim of this entry is to describe and explain the main forensic uses of fingermarks and fingerprints. It defines the concepts and provides the nomenclature related to forensic dactyloscopy. It describes the structure of the papillary ridges, the organization of the information in three levels, and its use for the fingerprint classification and individualization processes. It focuses on the variability and the distinctiveness of the marks and the prints and the exploitation of these properties in the forensic context. It emphasizes the difference between the properties of the mark and the prints in relation with the individualization process. It describes the current practice for fingermark evidence evaluation and analyzes the limits of forensic evaluation based on deterministic conclusions. It discusses the admissibility of the fingerprint evidence and provides casework examples involving misidentifications. It introduces the results of statistical research based on...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. C. Neumann, Statistics and probabilities as a means to support fingerprint examination, in Lee and Gaensslen’s Advances in Fingerprint Technology, ed. by R. Ramotowski (CRC, Boca Raton, 2012), pp. 407–452

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Locard, L’enquête criminelle et les méthodes scientifiques (Ernst Flammarion, Paris, 1920)

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Meuwly, R. Veldhuis, Forensic biometrics: from two communities to one discipline, in International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group – (BIOSIG), Darmstadt, ed. by A. Brömme, C. Busch. Gesellschaft für Informatiek e. V. (G.I.), 2012, pp. 207–218

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.A. Stoney, What made us ever think we could individualize using statistics. J. Forensic Sci. Soc. 31(2), 197–199 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Kuecken, C. Champod, Merkel cells and the individuality of friction ridge skin. J. Theor. Biol. 317, 229–237 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Wertheim, Embryology and morphology of friction ridge skin, in The Fingerprint Sourcebook, ed. by E.H. Holder, L.O. Robinson, J.H. Laub (U.S. Department of Justice, NIJ: Washington, DC, 2011) pp. 3-3–3-26.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.K. Jain, S. Prabahakar, S. Pankanti, On the similarity of identical twin fingerprints. Pattern Recognit. 35(12), 2653–2663 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Champod et al., Fingerprints and Other Ridge Skin Impressions (CRC, London, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.R. Ashbaugh, Qualitative-Quantitative Friction Ridge Analysis – An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Ridgeology, ed. by V.J. Geberth. Practical Aspects in Criminal and Forensic Investigations (CRC, Boca Raton, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Anthonioz et al., Level 3 details and their role in fingerprint identification: a survey among practitioners. J. Forensic Identif. 58(5), 562–589 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. S.M. Bleay et al., Home Office Fingerprint Source Book (Centre for Applied Science and Technology, St. Albans, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Anthonioz et al., Investigation of the reproducibility of third-level characteristics. J. Forensic Identif. 61(2), 171–192 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. D.A. Stoney, Measurement of fingerprint individuality, in Advances in Fingerprint Technology, ed. by H.C. Lee, R.E. Gaensslen (CRC, Boca Raton, 2001), pp. 327–387

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Neumann, I.W. Evett, J. Skerett, Quantifying the weight of evidence from a forensic fingerprint comparison: a new paradigm. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 175(2), 1–26 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Gonzalez-Rodriguez et al., Bayesian analysis of fingerprint, face and signature evidences with automatic biometric systems. Forensic Sci. Int. 155(2–3), 126–140 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Meuwly, Forensic individualisation from biometric data. Sci. Justice 46(4), 205–213 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. Egli, C. Champod, P. Margot, Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems—modelling within finger variability. Forensic Sci. Int. 167, 189–195 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Neumann et al., Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of any number of minutiae. J. Forensic Sci. 52(1), 54–64 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. I. Alberink, A. de Jongh, C. Rodriguez, Fingermark evidence evaluation based on AFIS matching scores: the effect of different types of conditioning on Likelihood Ratios. J. Forensic Sci. 59(1), 70–81 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Berry, D.A. Stoney, History and development of fingerprinting, in Advances in Fingerprint Technology, ed. by H.C. Lee, R.E. Gaensslen (CRC, Boca Raton, 2001), pp. 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  21. AFSP, Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion. Sci. Justice 49, 161–164 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. Taroni, C.G. Aitken, Probabilistic reasoning in the law. Part 2: assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of trace evidence other than DNA. Sci. Justice 38(3), 179–88 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. I.J. Good, Weight of evidence and the Bayesian likelihood ratio, in Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, ed. by C.G.G. Aitken (Wiley, Chichester, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Asbury, The fingerprint inquiry report, Edinburgh, 2011, p. 790

    Google Scholar 

  25. G.E. Fine, A Review of the FBI’s Handling of the Brandon Mayfield Case (Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Abraham et al., Spatial analysis of corresponding fingerprint features from match and close non-match populations. Forensic Sci. Int. 230(1–3): 87–98 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Pankanti, S. Prabhakar, A.K. Jain, On the individuality of fingerprints. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. (PAMI) 24(8), 1010–1025 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Y. Zhu, S.C. Dass, A.K. Jain, Models for assessing the individuality of fingerprints. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensic Secur. 2, 391–401 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. S.C. Dass et al., Individuality of fingerprints, in Encyclopedia of Biometrics, ed. by S.Z. Li, A.K. Jain (Springer, New York, 2009), pp. 741–751

    Google Scholar 

  30. G. Langenburg, Scientific research supporting the foundations of friction ridge examinations, in The Fingeprint Sourcebook, ed. by E.H. Holder, L.O. Robinson, J.H. Laub (U.S. Department of Justice, NIJ, Washington, DC, 2011), pp. 14–31

    Google Scholar 

  31. D. Ramos Castro, J. Rodriguez Gonzalez, Reliable support: measuring calibration of likelihood ratios. Forensic Sci. Int. 230(1–3), 156–169 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Meuwly, D. (2015). Forensic Use of Fingerprints and Fingermarks. In: Li, S.Z., Jain, A.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Biometrics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7488-4_181

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics