Skip to main content

Research Through Design in HCI

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ways of Knowing in HCI

Abstract

In Research through Design (RtD), researchers generate new knowledge by understanding the current state and then suggesting an improved future state in the form of a design. It involves deep reflection in iteratively understanding the people, problem, and context around a situation that researchers feel they can improve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basballe, D., & Halskov, K. (2012). Dynamics of Research through Design. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 58–67). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, A. (2004). Accessible abstractions for homes, schools and offices. Seminar Talk given on September 8, 2004 at Carnegie Mellon’s HCI Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R. (1995). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. In V. Margolin & R. Buchanan (Eds.), The Idea of Design (pp. 3–20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchenau, M., & Suri, J. F. (2000). Experience Prototyping. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 424–433). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. M., & Kellogg, W. A. (1989). Artifact as Theory-Nexus: Hermeneutics Meets Theory-based Design. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 7–14). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (1999). Design Research: A Disciplined Conversation. Design Issues, 15(2), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrah, C. N., English-Lueck, J., & Freeman, J. (2001). Families at work: An ethnography of dual career families. Report for the Sloane Foundation (Grant Number 98-6-21).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, S., Lee, M. K., Dey, A. K., & Zimmerman, J. (2007). Rapidly Exploring Application Design through Speed Dating. In Proceedings of the Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 429–446). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, S., Lee, M. K., Yiu, C. M., Zimmerman, J., & Dey, A. K. (2006). Principles of Smart Home Control. In Proceedings of the Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 19–34). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, S., Zeibart, B., Zimmerman, J., & Dey, A. (2011). Learning Patterns of Pick-ups and Drop-offs to Support Busy Family Coordination. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1175–1184). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, S., Zimmerman, J., & Dey, A. (2010). How Routine Learners can Support Family Coordination. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2461–2470). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djajadiningrat, T., Overbeeke, K., & Wensveen, S. (2002). But how, Donald, tell us how?: On the creation of meaning in interaction design through feedforward and inherent feedback. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 285–291). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, A. (1999). Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2001). Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallman, D. (2003). Design-oriented Human-computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 225–232). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J., & Evenson, S. (2008). Crafting a Place for Interaction Design Research in HCI. Design Issues, 24(3), 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J., & Stolterman, E. (2009). From Design Research to Theory: Evidence of a Maturing Field. In Proceedings of the Conference on the International Association for Societies of Design Research. IASDR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frayling, C. (1993). Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frens, J. W. (2006a). Designing for Rich Interaction: Integrating Form, Interaction, and Function. Doctoral Dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frens, J. (2006b). A Rich User Interface for a Digital Camera. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 10(2), 177–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W., Blythe, M., Boucher, A., Jarvis, N., Bowers, J., & Wright, P. (2010). The Prayer Companion: Openness and Specificity, Materiality and Spirituality. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2055–2064). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W. W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Gellerson, H., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., et al. (2004). The Drift Table: Designing for Ludic Engagement. In Extended Abstracts of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 885–900). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller, V., Tscheligi, M., Sefelin, R., Mäkelä, A., Puskala, A., & Karvonen, K. (1999). Maypole Highlights: Image makers. Interactions, 6(6), 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B. B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., et al. (2003). Technology probes: Inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of CHIo3 (pp. 17–23). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J., & Wensveen, S. (2011). Design Research through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. Boston: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. (1997). Design for People at Work. In T. Winograd (Ed.), Bringing Design to Software (pp. 273–305). Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. K., Forlizzi, J., Rybski, P. E., Crabbe, F., Chung, W., Finkle, J., et al. (2009). The Snackbot: Documenting the Design of a Robot for Long-term Human-robot Interaction. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 7–14). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. K., Kiesler, S., & Forlizzi, J. (2011). Mining behavioral economics to design persuasive technology for healthy choices. In Proceedings of thethe Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 325–334). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. K., Kiesler, S., Forlizzi, J., & Rybski, P. (2012). Ripple effects of an embedded social agent: A field study of a social robot in the workplace. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 695–704). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljungblad, S. (2007). Designing for New Photographic Experiences: How the Lomographic Practice Informed Context Photography. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Services (pp. 357–374). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, T., & Carroll, J. (1996). Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moussette, C. (2012). Simple Haptics: Sketching Perspectives for the Design of Haptic Interactions. Doctoral Dissertation, Umea University, Umea, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The Design Way: Intentional Change in a Unpredictable World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odom, W., Zimmerman, J., & Forlizzi, J. (2011). Teenagers and their Virtual Possessions: Design Opportunities and Issues. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1491–1500). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, J. (1986). Narratives at Work: Story telling as Cooperative Diagnostic Activity. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 62–72). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulos, E., & Jenkins, T. (2005). Urban Probes: Encountering our Emerging Urban Atmospheres. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 341–350). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J., & Paulos, E. (2010). Materializing Energy. In Proceedings of Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 113–122). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, P. R. (2008). Ethics and Aesthetics in Intelligent Product and System Design. Doctoral Dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, P. R., Overbeeke, C. J., Wensveen, S. A., & Hummels, C. M. (2008). A Designerly Critique on Enchantment. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 12(5), 359–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, P. R., & Wensveen, S. A. G. (2010). Designing Aesthetics of Behavior in Interaction: Using Aesthetic Experience as a Mechanism for Design. International Journal of Design, 4(2), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. London: Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D., & Bennett, J. (1996). Reflective Conversation with Materials. In T. Winograd (Ed.), Bringing Design to Software (pp. 171–189). Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. (1983). Direct Manipulation: A Step Beyond Programming Languages. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 16(8), 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolterman, S. (2008). The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction Design Research. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, I. E. (1963). Sketchpad: A Man-machine Graphical Communication System. In Proceedings of the Spring Joint Computer Conference (pp. 329–346). Spartan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, D., Zimmerman, J., & Hirsch, T. (2013). Probing Bus Stop for Insights on Transit Co-design. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1797–1806). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, D., Zimmerman, J., Steinfeld, A., & Tomasic, A. (2010). Understanding the Space for Co-design in Riders’ Interactions with a Transit Service. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1797–1806). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J. (2009). Designing for the Self: Making Products that Help People Become the Person they Desire to be. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 395–404). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J., Evenson, S., Baumann, K., & Purgathofer, P. (2004). Workshop on the Relationship Between Design and HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1741–1742). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J., Evenson, S., & Forlizzi, J. (2004). Discovering and Extracting Knowledge in the Design Project. In Proceedings of Future Ground. Design Research Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J., & Forlizzi, J. (2008). The Role of Design Artifacts in Design Theory Construction. Artifact, 2(1), 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007). Research through Design as a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 493–502). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). An Analysis and Critique of Research through Design: Towards a Formalization of a Research Approach. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 310–319). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J., Tomasic, A., Garrod, C., Yoo, D., Hiruncharoenvate, C., Aziz, R., et al. (2011). Field Trial of Tiramisu: Crowd-sourcing Bus Arrival Times to Spur Co-design. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1677–1686). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Zimmerman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. (2014). Research Through Design in HCI. In: Olson, J., Kellogg, W. (eds) Ways of Knowing in HCI. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0377-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0378-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics