Skip to main content

Nash Equilibria and Dominant Strategies in Routing

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Algorithms

Years and Authors of Summarized Original Work

  • 2005; Wang, Li, Chu

Problem Definition

This problem is concerned with the multicast routing and cost sharing in a selfish network composed of relay terminals and receivers. This problem is motivated by the recent observation that the selfish behavior of the network could largely degraded existing system performance, even dysfunction. The work of Wang, Li and Chu [7] first presented some negative results of the strategyproof mechanism in multicast routing and sharing, and then proposed a new solution based on Nash Equilibrium that could greatly improve the performance.

Wang, Li and Chu modeled a network by a link weighted graph \( { G=(V,E,\textbf{c}) } \), where V is the set of all nodes and \( { \textbf{c} } \) is the cost vector of the set E of links. For a multicast session, let Q denote the set of all receivers. In game theoretical networking literatures, usually there are two models for the multicast cost/payment sharing.

Axiom Model...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Feigenbaum J, Papadimitriou CH, Shenker S (2001) Sharing the cost of multicast transmissions. J Comput Syst Sci 63:21–41

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Kao M-Y, Li X-Y, Wang W (2005) Towards truthful mechanisms for binary demand games: a general framework. In: ACM EC, Vancouver, pp 213–222

    Google Scholar 

  3. Herzog S, Shenker S, Estrin D (1997) Sharing the “cost” of multicast trees: an axiomatic analysis. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 5:847–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moulin H, Shenker S (2001) Strategyproof sharing of submodular costs: budget balance versus efficiency. Econ Theory 18:511–533

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang W, Li X-Y, Sun Z, Wang Y (2005) Design multicast protocols for non-cooperative networks. In: Proceedings of the 24th IEEE INFOCOM, Miami, vol 3, pp 1596–1607

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang W, Li X-Y, Wang Y (2004) Truthful multicast in selfish wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM MOBICOM, Philadelphia, pp 245–259

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang W, Li X-Y, Chu X (2005) Nash equilibria, dominant strategies in routing. In: Workshop for Internet and network economics (WINE). Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3828. Springer, Hong Kong, pp 979–988

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weizhao Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Wang, W., Li, XY., Chu, X. (2016). Nash Equilibria and Dominant Strategies in Routing. In: Kao, MY. (eds) Encyclopedia of Algorithms. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2864-4_254

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics