Skip to main content

Mechanism Design and Differential Privacy

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Algorithms
  • 214 Accesses

Years and Authors of Summarized Original Work

  • 2007; McSherry, Talwar

  • 2011; Ghosh, Roth

  • 2012; Nissim, Orlandi, Smorodinsky

  • 2012; Fleischer, Lyu

  • 2012; Ligett, Roth

  • 2013; Chen, Chong, Kash, Moran, Vadhan

  • 2014; Nissim, Vadhan, Xiao

Problem Definition

Mechanism design and private data analysis both study the question of performing computations over data collected from individual agents while satisfying additional restrictions. The focus in mechanism design is on performing computations that are compatible with the incentives of the individual agents, and the additional restrictions are toward motivating agents to participate in the computation (individual rationality) and toward having them report their true data (incentive compatibility). The focus in private data analysis is on performing computations that limit the information leaked by the output on each individual agent’s sensitive data, and the additional restriction is on the influence each agent may have on the outcome distribution...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Alpert CJ, Chan T, Kahng AB, Markov IL, Mulet P (1998) Faster minimization of linear wirelength for global placement. IEEE Trans CAD 17(1):3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen Y, Chong S, Kash IA, Moran T, Vadhan SP (2013) Truthful mechanisms for agents that value privacy. In: EC 2013, Philadelphia, pp 215–232

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dwork C, McSherry F, Nissim K, Smith A (2006) Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In: TCC 2006, New York, pp 265–284

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fleischer L, Lyu Y-H (2012) Approximately optimal auctions for selling privacy when costs are correlated with data. In: EC 2012, Valencia, pp 568–585

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ghosh A, Roth A (2011) Selling privacy at auction. In: EC 2011, San Jose, pp 199–208

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huang Z, Kannan S (2012) The exponential mechanism for social welfare: private, truthful, and nearly optimal. In: FOCS 2012, New Brunswick, pp 140–149

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ligett K, Roth A (2012) Take it or leave it: running a survey when privacy comes at a cost. In: WINE 2012, Liverpool, pp 378–391

    Google Scholar 

  8. McSherry F, Talwar K (2007) Mechanism design via differential privacy. In: FOCS 2007, Providence, pp 94–103

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nissim K, Orlandi C, Smorodinsky R (2012) Privacy-aware mechanism design. In: EC 2012, Valencia, pp 774–789

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nissim K, Smorodinsky R, Tennenholtz M (2012) Approximately optimal mechanism design via differential privacy. In: ITCS 2012, Boston, pp 203–213

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nissim K, Vadhan SP, Xiao D (2014) Redrawing the boundaries on purchasing data from privacy-sensitive individuals. In: ITCS 2014, Princeton, pp 411–422

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xiao D (2013) Is privacy compatible with truthfulness? In: ITCS 2013, Berkeley, pp 67–86

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kobbi Nisim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Nisim, K., Xiao, D. (2016). Mechanism Design and Differential Privacy. In: Kao, MY. (eds) Encyclopedia of Algorithms. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2864-4_548

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics