Skip to main content

Point Location

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Algorithms
  • 44 Accesses

Years and Authors of Summarized Original Work

  • 1983; Kirkpatrick

  • 1991; Seidel

  • 2009; Haran, Halperin

Point Location, Fig. 1
figure 1621 figure 1621

The paths traversed by (a) a straight-line walk, (b) an orthogonal walk, and (c) a visibility walk. Note that any path following the arrows is possible in the visibility walk

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Chazelle B (1991) Triangulation a simple polygon in linear time. Discret Comput Geom 6(1):485–524

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Devillers O (2002) The Delaunay hierarchy. Int J Found Comput Sci 13:163–181

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Devillers O, Pion S, Teillaud M (2002) Walking in a triangulation. Int J Found Comput Sci 13:181–199

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Devroye L, Lemaire C, Moreau JM (2004) Expected time analysis for Delaunay point location. Comput Geom Theory Appl 29:61–89

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Devroye L, Mücke E, Zhu B (1998) A note on point location in Delaunay triangulations of random points. Algorithmica (Spec Issue Aver Case Anal Algorithms) 22(4):477–482

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dobkin D, Lipton RJ (1976) Multidimensional searching problems. SIAM J Comput 5(2):181–186

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Haran I, Halperin D (2009) An experimental study of point location in planar arrangements in CGAL. J Exp Algorithm 13:Article 3

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hemmer M, Kleinbort M, Halperin D (2012) Improved implementation of point location in general two-dimensional subdivisions. In: Proceedings of the 20th European symposium on algorithms (ESA), Ljubljana, pp 611–623

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kirkpatrick D (1983) Optimal search in planer subdivisions. SIAM J Comput 12(1):28–35

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Mulmuley K (1990) A fast planar partition algorithm, I. J Symb Comput 10(3):253–280

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Sarnak N, Tarjan RE (1986) Planar point location using persistent search trees. Commun ACM 29(7):669–679

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Seidel R (1991) A simple and fast incremental randomized algorithm for computing trapezoidal decompositions and for triangulating polygons. Comput Geom: Theory Appl 1(1):51–64

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Seidel R, Adamy U (2000) On the exact worst case query complexity of planar point location. J Algorithms 37:189–217

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcel Roeloffzen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Roeloffzen, M. (2016). Point Location. In: Kao, MY. (eds) Encyclopedia of Algorithms. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2864-4_587

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics