Skip to main content

Identifying Spam in Reviews

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining
  • 208 Accesses

Synonyms

Features; Online shopping; Opinion spam; Review spammer; Social networking; Spam detection; Spam review; User-generated content; Water army

Glossary

Features:

A set of attributes indicating the spamming behavior

Review Spammer:

A malicious user who write fraudulent reviews

Spam Detection:

Identify spam reviews, users, or groups

Spam Review:

A deceptive review to manipulate the opinon about the product

Water Army:

A group of ghostwriters paid to post fake reviews

Definition

The fake reviews target at promoting or demoting the sale of products in e-commerce sites, and attracting attention or triggering curiosity in social networking sites, by creating and spreading purposeful comments. Hence, the goal of spam detection is to identify spam objects, including review/opinion spam, spam users, and spammer groups, from reviews.

Introduction

Online reviews are actually a kind of user-generated content (UGC) and hence provide a voice for customers to praise or criticize products,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chen C, Wu K, Srinivasan V, Zhang X (2013) Battling the internet water army: detection of hidden paid posters. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining. ACM, Niagara, ON, Canada. pp 116–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Z, Gao B, Sun C, Jiang Y, Liu TY (2011) Let web spammers expose themselves. In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on web search and data mining. ACM, Kowloon, Hong Kong. pp 525–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa LF, Rodrigues FA, Travieso G, Villas Boas PR (2007) Characterization of complex networks: a survey of measurements. Adv Phys 56(1):167–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fakhraei S, Foulds J, Shashanka M, Getoor L (2015) Collective spammer detection in evolving multirelational social networks. In: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, Sydney, NSW, Australia. pp 1769–1778

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayazi A, Lee K, Caverlee J, Squicciarini A (2015) Uncovering crowdsourced manipulation of online reviews. In: Proceedings of the 38th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. ACM, Santiago, Chile. pp 233–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Fei G, Mukherjee A, Liu B, Hsu M, Castellanos M, Ghosh R (2013) Exploiting burstiness in reviews for review spammer detection. ICWSM 13:175–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfeld B (2008) Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: the role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inf Syst Res 19(3):291–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grier C, Thomas K, Paxson V, Zhang M (2010) Spam: the understanding on 140 characters or less. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer and communications security. ACM, Chicago, IL, USA. pp 27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyongyi Z, Garcia-Molina H (2005) Web spam taxonomy. In: First international workshop on adver-sarial information retrieval on the web (AIRWeb 2005), ACM, Chiba, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Heydari A, ali Tavakoli M, Salim N, Heydari Z (2015) Detection of review spam: a survey. Expert Syst Appl 42(7):3634–3642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heymann P, Koutrika G, Garcia-Molina H (2007) Fighting spam on social web sites: a survey of approaches and future challenges. IEEE Internet Comput 11(6):36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagatic TN, Johnson NA, Jakobsson M, Menczer F (2007) Social phishing. Commun ACM 50(10):94–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jindal N, Liu B (2007a) Analyzing and detecting review spam. In: Seventh IEEE international conference on data mining. IEEE, Omaha, NE, USA. pp 547–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Jindal N, Liu B (2007b) Review spam detection. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, Banff, AB, Canada. pp 1189–1190

    Google Scholar 

  • Jindal N, Liu B (2008) Opinion spam and analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on web search and data mining. ACM, Palo Alto, CA, USA. pp 219–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Kc S, Mukherjee A (2016) On the temporal dynamics of opinion spamming: case studies on yelp. In: Proceedings of the international World Wide Web conferences, ACM, Montreal, Canada. pp 369–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam S, Riedl J (2004) Shilling recommender systems for fun and profit. In: WWW’04, ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp 393–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JS, Zhu D (2012) Shilling attack detection-a new approach for a trustworthy recommender system. INFORMS J Comput 24(1):117–131

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee K, Caverlee J, Webb S (2010) Uncovering social spammers: social honeypots + machine learning. In: Proceeding SIGIR’10 Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, ACM, Geneva, Switzerland. pp 435–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Huang M, Yang Y, Zhu X (2011) Learning to identify review spam. In: IJCAI Proceedings-international joint conference on artificial intelligence, vol 22, IJCAI/AAAI, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. p 2488

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim EP, Nguyen VA, Jindal N, Liu B, Lauw HW (2010) Detecting product review spammers using rating behaviors. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management. ACM, pp 939–948

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Zhu T, Wang X, Zhang J, Zhou A (2014a) Towards online review spam detection. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, Seoul, Korea. pp 341–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Zhu T, Wu H, Zhang J, Wang X, Zhou A (2014b) Towards online anti-opinion spam: Spotting fake reviews from the review sequence. In: Advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM), 2014 IEEE/ACM international conference on, IEEE, Beijing, China. pp 261–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Zhang Y, Lin H, Wu J, Wu Z, Zhang X (2013) How many zombies around you? In: Data mining (ICDM), 2013 I.E. 13th international conference on, IEEE, Dallas, TX, USA, pp 1133–1138

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta B, Nejdl W (2009) Unsupervised strategies for shilling detection and robust collaborative filtering. User Model User-Adap Inter 19(1–2):65–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Liu B, Glance N (2012) Spotting fake reviewer groups in consumer reviews. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, Lyon, France. pp 191–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Kumar A, Liu B, Wang J, Hsu M, Castellanos M, Ghosh R (2013a) Spotting opinion spammers using behavioral footprints. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, Chicago, IL, USA. pp 632–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Venkataraman V, Liu B, Glance NS (2013b) What yelp fake review filter might be doing? In: ICWSM AAAI, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott M, Choi Y, Cardie C, Hancock JT (2011) Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In: Proceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, vol 1. Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics 就是Pubblisher??, Portland, OR, USA. pp 309–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott M, Cardie C, Hancock J (2012) Estimating the prevalence of deception in online review communities. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, Lyon, France. pp 201–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitsillidis A, Levchenko K, Kreibich C, Kanich C, Voelker GM, Paxson V, Weaver N, Savage S (2010) Botnet judo: fighting spam with itself. In: NDSS The Internet Society, San Diego, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayana S, Akoglu L (2015) Collective opinion spam detection: Bridging review networks and metadata. In: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, Sydney, NSW, Australia. pp 985–994

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahami M, Dumais S, Heckerman D, Horvitz E (1998) A bayesian approach to filtering junk e-mail. In: Learning for text categorization: Papers from the 1998 workshop, vol 62, pp 98–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Spirin N, Han J (2012) Survey on web spam detection: principles and algorithms. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newslett 13(2):50–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Xie S, Liu B, Yu PS (2011) Review graph based online store review spammer detection. In: Data mining (ICDM), 2011 I.E. 11th international conference on, IEEE, Vancouver, BC, Canada. pp 1242–1247

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Wu Z, Bu Z, Cao J, Yang D, Gorman G, He W (2016) Discovering shilling groups in a real e-commerce platform. Online Inf Rev 40(1):62–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Feng Z, Fan W, Gao J, Yu Y (2013) Detecting marionette microblog users for improved information credibility. In: Machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases. Springer, Berlin, pp 483–498

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z, Wang Y, Wang Y, Wu J, Cao J, Zhang L (2015) Spammers detection from product reviews: a hybrid model. In: 2015 I.E. international conference on data mining, ICDM 2015, Atlantic City, 14–17 Nov 2015, pp 1039–1044

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu R, He X, Liu Y (2014) GLAD: group anomaly detection in social media analysis. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp 372–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou B, Pei J (2009) Link spam target detection using page farms. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data (TKDD) 3(3):13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was partially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0401001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71571093, 91646204, 71372188), National Center for International Joint Research on E-Business Information Processing (2013B01035), Industry Projects in Jiangsu S&T Pillar Program (BE2014141), and Key/Surface Projects of Natural Science Research in Jiangsu Provincial Colleges and Universities (14KJA520001, 15KJB520012 and 15KJB520011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiang Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Wu, Z., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Cao, J. (2018). Identifying Spam in Reviews. In: Alhajj, R., Rokne, J. (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_110200

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics