Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Building Theories in Software Engineering

  • Chapter
Book cover Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering

In mature sciences, building theories is the principal method of acquiring and accumulating knowledge that may be used in a wide range of settings. In software engineering, there is relatively little focus on theories. In particular, there is little use and development of empirically-based theories. We propose, and illustrate with examples, an initial framework for describing software engineering theories, and give advice on how to start proposing, testing, modifying and using theories to support both research and practise in software engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abdel-Hamid, T.K., Sengupta, K. and Ronan, D., Software project control: an experimental investigation of judgement with fallible information, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19(6): 603–612, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anda, B.C.D. and Hansen, K., A case study on the application of UML in legacy development. In ISESE’2006 (Fifth ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering), J. Maldonado and C. Wohlin (eds.), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, ACM Press, September 21–22, pp. 124–133, 2006.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anda, B.C.D., Hansen, K., Gullesen, I. and Thorsen, H.K., Experiences from using a UML-based development method in a large safety-critical project, Empirical Software Engineering, 11(4): 555–581, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arisholm, E., Briand, L.C., Hove, S.E. and Labiche, Y., The impact of UML documentation on software maintenance: an experimental evaluation, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 32(6): 365–381, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, S.B., Organizational theories: some criteria for evaluation, Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 496–515, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P., Loh, S. and Weil, F., Model-driven engineering in a large industrial context–motorola case study. In MoDELS 2005, LNCS 3713, L. Briand and C. Williams (eds.), New York, Springer-Verlag, pp. 476–491, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A., The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173–1182, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basili, V.R., Editorial, Empirical Software Engineering, 1(2), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basili, V.R., Shull, F. and Lanubile, F., Building knowledge through families of experiments, IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 24(4): 456–473, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J. and Jacobson, I. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, Boston, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M., Scientific Research: The Search for a System, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, J.M., Detienne, F. and Wiedenbeck, S., Object-oriented program comprehension: effect of expertise, task and phase, Empirical Software Engineering, 7(2): 115–156, 2002.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. and Swatman, P.A., Structured-case: a methodological framework for building theory in information systems research, European Journal of Information Systems, 9: 235–242, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B., Developing Sociological Knowledge: Theory and Method, 2nd edn, Belmont, CA, Wadsworth Publishing, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobing, B. and Parsons, J., How UML is used, Communications of the ACM, 49(5): 109–113, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J., The Middle Works, 1899–1924, Vol. 15, J.A. Boydston, (ed.), Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press, 1976–1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, R., Theory Building, Free Press, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endres, A. and Rombach, D., A Handbook of Software and Systems Engineering. Empirical Observations, Laws and Theories. Fraunhofer IESE Series on Software Engineering, Pearson Education Limited, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R.P., QED–The Strange Theory of Light and Matter, Penguin Science, Harmondsworth, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, R., The Explanatory Power of Models, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser H.G. and Strauss A.L., The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Hawthorne, NY, Aldine Publishing Company, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P., Pragmatism: philosophical aspects, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 17: 11954–11958, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, S., The nature of theory in information systems, MIS Quarterly, 30(3): 611–642, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, T.R., A translation approach to portable ontology specifications, Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2): 199–220, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haig, B.D., An abductive theory of scientific method, Psychological Methods, 10(4): 371–388, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannay, J.E., Sjøberg, D.I.K. and Dybå, T., A systematic review of theory use in software engineering experiments, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 33(2): 87–107, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, S. and Penrose R., The Nature of Space and Time, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1996.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herbsleb, D.J. and Mockus, A., Formulation and preliminary test of an empirical theory of coordination in software engineering, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 28(5): 138–147, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A.R. and March, S.T., The information systems research cycle, IEEE Computer Society, 36(119): 111–113, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A., March, S.T., Park, J., and Ram, S, Design science research in information systems, MIS Quarterly, 28(1): 75–105, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W., Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, New York: Longman Green and Co, 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, M. and Sjøberg, D.I.K., Generalization and theory-building in software engineering research. In Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE2004), IEE Proceedings, pp. 29–36, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchenham, B.A., Pfleeger, S.L., Pickard, L.M., Jones, P.W., Hoaglin, D.C., El Emam, K. and Rosenberg, J., Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering, IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 28(8): 721–734, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, L.P.W., Wong, B. and Jeffery, R., An extension of the behavioral theory of group performance in software development technical reviews, Proceedings of the Tenth Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference Software Engineering Conference, pp. 520–530, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K., The research center for group dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sociometry, 8: 126–135, 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C.E., Alternatives to validity. Some thoughts suggested by Campbell’s guidelines, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8: 509–520, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R.M. and Ehrenberg, A.S.C., The design of replicated studies, The American Statistician, 47: 217–228, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, J.W., Theory-testing, generalization, and the problem of external validity, Sociological Theory, 21: 236–253, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynham, S.A., The general method of theory-building research in applied disciplines, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3): 221–241, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A., Russel, D. and Atchison, B. Model-driven development within a legacy system: an industry experience report, Proceedings of the 2005 Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC’2005). IEEE Computer Society, pp. 14–22, April 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, S.T. and Smith, G.F., Design and natural science research on information technology, Decision Support Systems, 15(4): 251–266, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markovsky, B., The structure of theories. In Group Processes, M. Foschi and E.J. Lawler, (eds.), Nelson-Hall Publishers, Chicago, pp. 3–24, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K., Social Theory and Social Structure, 3rd ed, The Free Press, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E., The Structure of Science, Hackett, Indianapolis, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S., Collected Papers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, R.G., Lessons learned applying UML in embedded software systems designs, Proceedings of the Second IEEE Workshop on Software Technologies for Future Embedded and Ubiquitous Systems (WSTFEUS’04), Vienna, Austria, May 11–12, pp., 75–79, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K., The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchison, London, 1959.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanujan, S., Scamell, R.W. and Shah, J.R., An experimental investigation of the impact of individual, program, and organizational characteristics on software maintenance effort, Journal of Systems and Software, 54(2): 137–157, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A., Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction, Routledge, London, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (1995). Theory. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. T. Honderich, Oxford University Press, New York, 870–871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W.C., Four decades of scientific explanation. In Scientific Explanation, P. Kitcher and W.C. Salmon, (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 13, Minnesota Press, Series, pp. 3–219, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandborg, D., Mathematical explanation and the theory of why-questions, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49(4): 603–624, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C, Jeffery, D.R., Land, L. and Yetton, P., The effectiveness of software development technical reviews: a behaviorally Motivated program of research, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26(1): 1–14, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T., Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A., The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjøberg, D.I.K., Dybå, T. and Jørgensen, M., The future of empirical methods in software engineering research. In Future of Software Engineering (FOSE ‘07), L. Briand and A. Wolf, (eds.), IEEE-CS Press, Minneapolis, US, pp. 358–378, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjøberg, D.I.K., Hannay, J.E., Hansen, O., Kampenes, V.B., Karahasanović, A., Liborg, N.-K. and Rekdal, A.C., A survey of controlled experiments in software engineering, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(9): 733–753, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. and Corbin, J., Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R.I. and Staw, B.M., What theory is not, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 371–384, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P., Conceptual Revolutions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, W.F., Should computer scientist experiment more? 16 excuses to avoid experimentation, IEEE Computer, 31(5): 32–40, 1998.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T.A. and Kintsch, W., Strategies of Discourse Comprehension, Academic Press, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B., The Scientific Image, Oxford University Press, New York, 1980.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D.G., The growth of theories. In Group Processes, M. Foschi and E. J. Lawler, (eds.), Nelson-Hall Publishers, Chicago, pp. 25–42, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R., Editor’s comments, MIS Quarterly, 27(3): 3–12, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E., Theory construction as disciplined imagination, Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 516–531, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D.A., What constitutes a theoretical contribution, Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 490–495, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Applied Social Research Methods Series 5, 3rd ed, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Software Engineering, Simula Research Laboratory, NO-1325, Lysaker, Norway

    Dag I. K. Sjøberg, Tore Dybå, Bente C. D. Anda & Jo E. Hannay

Authors
  1. Dag I. K. Sjøberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tore Dybå
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bente C. D. Anda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jo E. Hannay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fraunhofer Center Maryland, 20742, College Park, MD, USA

    Forrest Shull

  2. National Research Council Canada, K1A 0R6, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    Janice Singer

  3. Simula Research Laboratory, NO-1325, Lysaker, Norway

    Dag I. K. Sjøberg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sjøberg, D.I.K., Dybå, T., Anda, B.C.D., Hannay, J.E. (2008). Building Theories in Software Engineering. In: Shull, F., Singer, J., Sjøberg, D.I.K. (eds) Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-044-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-044-5_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-043-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-044-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation