Skip to main content

Frequent Set Meta Mining: Towards Multi-Agent Data Mining

  • Conference paper
Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXIV (SGAI 2007)

Abstract

In this paper we describe the concept of Meta ARM in the context of its objectives and challenges and go on to describe and analyse a number of potential solutions. Meta ARM is defined as the process of combining the results of a number of individually obtained Associate Rule Mining (ARM) operations to produce a composite result. The typical scenario where this is desirable is in multi-agent data mining where individual agents wish to preserve the security and privacy of their raw data but are prepared to share data mining results. Four Meta ARM algorithms are described: a Brute Force approach, an Apriori approach and two hybrid techniques. A “bench mark” system is also described to allow for appropriate comparison. A complete analysis of the algorithms is included that considers the effect of: the number of data sources, the number of records in the data sets and the number of attributes represented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Agrawal, R. and Psaila, G. (1995). Active Data Mining. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining, AAAI, pp 3-8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal, R., Mehta, M., Shafer, J., Srikant, R., Arning, A. and Bollinger, T. (1996). The Quest Data Mining System. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, (KDD1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aref, W.G., Elfeky, M.G., Elmagarmid, A.K. (2004). Incremental, Online, and Merge Mining of Partial Periodic Patterns in Time-Series Databases. IEEE Transaction in Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol 16, No 3, pp.332-342

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coenen, F.P. Leng, P., and Goulbourne, G. (2004). Tree Structures for Mining Association Rules. Journal of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Vol 8, No 1, pp25-51.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Dietterich, T.G. (2002). Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning. In Kittler J. and Roli, F. (Ed.), First International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems, LNCS pp1-15 Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXIV 151

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goulbourne, G., Coenen, F.P. and Leng, P. (1999). Algorithms for Computing Association Rules Using A Partial-Support Tree. Proc. ES99, Springer, London, pp132-147.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Han,J., Pei, J. and Yiwen, Y. (2000).Mining Frequent Patterns Without Candidate Generation. Proc. ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, ACM Press, pp1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koh, J.L. and Shieh, S.F. (2004). An efficient approach to maintaining association rules based on adjusting FP-tree structures. Proc. DASFAA 2004, pp417-424.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leung, C.K-S., Khan, Q.I, and Hoque, T, (2005). CanTree: A tree structure for efficient incremental mining of Frequent Patterns. Proc. ICDM 2005. pp274-281.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li W., Han, J. and Pei, J. (2001). CMAR: Accurate and Efficient Classification Based on Multiple Class-Association Rules. Proc. ICDM 2001, pp369-376.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, X., Deng, Z-H. and Tang S-W. (2006). A Fast Algorithm for Maintenance of Association Rules in Incremental Databases. Proc. ADMA 2006, Springer-Verlag LNAI 4093, pp 56-63.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, B. Hsu, W. and Ma, Y (1998). Integrating Classification and Association Rule Mining. Proc. KDD-98, New York, 27-31 August. AAAI. pp80-86.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prodromides, A., Chan, P. and Stolfo, S. (2000). Meta-Learning in Distributed Data Mining Systems: Issues and Approaches. In Kargupta, H. and Chan, P. (Eds), Advances in Distributed and Parallel Knowledge Discovery. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 2000, pp81-114.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas, S., Bodagala, S., Alsabti, K. and Ranka, S. (1997). An efficient algorithm for the incremental updation of association rules. In Proc. 3rd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. pp263-266.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Veloso, A.A., Meira, W., de Carvalho B. Possas, M.B., Parthasarathy, S. and Zaki, M.J. (2002). Mining Frequent Itemsets in Evolving Databases. Proc. Second SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM’2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Albashiri, K.A., Coenen, F., Sanderson, R., Leng, P. (2008). Frequent Set Meta Mining: Towards Multi-Agent Data Mining. In: Bramer, M., Coenen, F., Petridis, M. (eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXIV. SGAI 2007. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-094-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-094-0_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-093-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-094-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics