Skip to main content

Methods for Design of Semantic Message-Based B2B Interaction Standards

  • Conference paper
Enterprise Interoperability III

Abstract

The business interest in interoperability is rapidly growing. However, interoperability is not an easy target and is in many cases not easily achieved. One of the means to reach interoperability, standardization of B2B interactions, is often lacking quality which unfortunately has impact on interoperability. It is well-known that methods can improve the quality of standards. This paper supports the search of adequate methods by comparing several methods than can be used for design of B2B standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bastiaans, G.J.A. “Standardizing electronic transaction based on state-of-the-art concepts”, graduation thesis, TNO, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, J. & Mukerji, J., “MDA Guide Version 1.0.1”, OMG omg/2003-06-01, http://www.omg.org/docs/omg/03-06-01.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roser, S. & Bauer, B., “A Categorization of Collaborative Business Process Modeling Techniques,” cecw, pp. 43–54, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dorn, Grun, Werthner & Zapletal, “A Survey of B2B Methodologies and Technologies: From Business Models towards Deployment Artifacts,” hicss, p. 143a, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. UN/CEFACT’s Modeling Methodology User guide, 2003-09-22, http://www.unece.org/cefact/umm/UMM_userguide_220606.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  6. Villarreal, P.D., Salomone, E. & Chiotti, O., “A MDA-based development process for collaborative business processes”, in proceedings of European Workshop on Milestones, Models and Mappings for Model-Driven Architecture (3M4MDA), Bilbao, Spain, July 11, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, H.D., “Conceptual Modeling and Specification Generation for B2B Business Process based on ebXML.” ACM SIGMOD Record 31.1 (2002): 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kramler, G., Kapsammer, E., Kappel, G., and Retschitzegger, W., “Towards Using UML 2 for Modelling Web Service Collaboration Protocols,” in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications (INTEROP-ESA’05), Feb. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bauer, B., Müller, J.P. & Roser, S.: A Model-Driven Approach to Designing Cross-Enterprise Business Processes, University of Augsburg, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koehler, J., Hauser, R., Kapoor, S., Wu, F.Y. & Kumaran, S., “A Model-Driven Transformation Method,” edoc, p. 186, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huemer, C., “UN/CEFACT’s Modeling Methodology (UMM) in a nutshell”, http://unece.org/cefact/umm/UMM_userguide-nutshell.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  12. ISO. Open-EDI Reference Model, 1995. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC30 ISO Standard 14662.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huemer, C. & Liegl, P., A UML Profile for Core Components and their Transformation to XSD. accepted at the Second International Workshop on Services Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hofreiter, B., Huemer, C., Liegl, P., Schuster, R. & Zapletal, M., “UN/CEFACT’S Modeling Methodology (UMM): A UML Profile for B2B e-Commerce”, in Advances in Conceptual Modeling-Theory and Practice (ER 2006), 2006. Tucson, Arizona, VS: Springer, 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hofreiter, B. & Huemer, C.. UMM Add-In: A UML Extension for UN/CEFACT’s Modeling Methodology. In European Conference on Model Driven Architecture (ECMDA’06), July 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hofreiter, B., Huemer, C., Liegl, P., Schuster, R. & Zapletal, M., “Deriving executable BPEL from UMM Business Transactions,” scc, pp. 178–186, IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC 2007), 2007

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hofreiter, B. & Huemer, C.. Transforming UMM Business Collaboration Models to BPEL. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Modeling Inter-Organizational Systems (MIOS), 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frick, A. & Helger, P., “UMM BTV nach WS-CDL Transformator”, online resource, http://philip.helger.com/gt/get.php?where=gt&file=wscdl.pdf, downloaded at 10-18-2007.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Krämer, B., Papazoglou, M. & Schmidt, H.W., “Information Systems Interoperability”, Research Studio Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Folmer, E., Bastiaans, J. (2008). Methods for Design of Semantic Message-Based B2B Interaction Standards. In: Mertins, K., Ruggaber, R., Popplewell, K., Xu, X. (eds) Enterprise Interoperability III. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-221-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-221-0_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-220-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-221-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics