Skip to main content

Engineer to Order Supply Chain Improvement Based on the GRAI Meta-model for Interoperability: An Empirical Study

  • Conference paper
Enterprise Interoperability III
  • 1133 Accesses

Abstract

Companies compete in saturated markets trying to be more productive and more efficient. In this context, to manage the entire supply network to optimize overall performance becomes critical. Enterprise Modelling of Decision Systems is an important instrument to structure this complexity. This paper explores the methodology in which the redesign of internal and external operational integrated processes should be done, applying the GRAI Meta Model and the Design Principles for Interoperability, in order to improve the overall performance of an Engineer to Order Supply Chain. This research has also conducted a case study in the Producer Goods Sector from an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) point of view. The main conclusions related to the aim of the paper are that, the reengineered system integrates the Supply Chain Network more effectively, as well as achieving the customers’ objectives in terms of time and cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acur N, Biticci U, (2000) Active assessment of strategy performance. Proceedings of the IFP WG 5.7, International Conference on Production Management, Tromso, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bittitci US, Martinez V, Albores P, Parung J, (2004) Creating and managing value in collaborative network. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management Vol. 34, No.3/4, pp.251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Browne J, Sackett PJ, Wortmann JC, (1995) Future Manufacturing Systems-towards the extended enterprise. Computers in Industry, Vol.25, pp.235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Caron F, Fiore A, (1995) Engineer to order companies: how to integrate manufacturing and innovative processes. International Journal of Project Management. Vol. 13, No.5.pp.313–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coughlan, P., Coughlan D. (2002) “Action Research: Action research for operations management”.International Journal of Operations and Production Management Vol 22 No 2 pp. 220–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dassisti M, Chen D, Scorziello F, (2006) GRAI and SCOR Meta-model and Design Principles for Interoperability. I-ESA’06 Conference, Bordeaux, France

    Google Scholar 

  7. Doumeingts G, Vallespir B, Chen D, (1998) GRAI Grid Decisional Modelling. In Handbook on Architecture of Information Systems, Edited by P. Bernus, K. Mertins, G. Schmith, Springer Verlag, pp. 313–337.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Errasti A, Oyarbide A, Santos J, Case Research to gain competitive advantage through construction process reeingineering. Faim2005, 15thInternational Conference on Flexible Automation & Intelligent Manufacturing.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Errasti A, Poler R, Oyarbide A, Santos J, (2006) Supply chain improvement based on GRAI Method: an empirical study. Proceedings of 13th Euroma International Conference, Glasgow, Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fawcett S, Magnan G, (2002) The rhetoric and reality of supply chain integration. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol.32, No 5, pp.339–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feurer R, Chaharbaghi K, Wargin J. (1995) Analysis of strategy formulation and implementation at Hewlet Packard. Management Decision, Vol.33, No.10, pp.4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gunn TG (1987) Manufacturing for Competitive Advantage: Becoming a World Class Manufacturer. Ballinger Publishing Company, Boston M.A.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2001) The Strategy Focused Organization, Harvard Business School Press, Boston Massachussets.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lummus R, Vovurka R, (1999) Defining supply chain management: a historical perspective and practical guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems No.99/1, pp.11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Martinez, V. & Bititci, U.(2006) Aligning value propositions in supply chains. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 1, 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marucheck A, Pannesi R, Anderson C, (1990) An exploratory study of the manufacturing strategy in practice. Journal of Operations Management, Vol.9, No.1, pp.101–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Platts KW (1990) Manufacturing audit in the process of strategy formulation. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Poler R, Lario FC, Doumeingts G, (2002) Dynamic Model of Decision Systems (DMDS). Computers in Industry, Vol.49, pp.175–193.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Porter ME, (1980) Competitive Strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ramsay, J. (2005) The real meaning of value in trading relationships. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25, 549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Salvador F, Rungtusanatham M, Forza C, Trentin A, (2005) Understanding synergies and trade-offs between volume flexibility and mix flexibility in Build-to-Order strategies. Proceedings of 12th Euroma International Conference, Budapest, Hungary

    Google Scholar 

  22. Slack N, Chambers S, Johnston R, (2004) Operations Management. 4th ed., Pearson, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas S, (2002) Contractors risk in Design, Novate and Construct contracts”. International Journal of Project Management. 20 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Voss, C. Nikos Tsikriktsis and Mark Frohlich. (2002) “Case Research in operations management”.2002.International Journal of Operations and Production Management Vol 22 No 2 pp.195–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Errasti, A., Poler, R. (2008). Engineer to Order Supply Chain Improvement Based on the GRAI Meta-model for Interoperability: An Empirical Study. In: Mertins, K., Ruggaber, R., Popplewell, K., Xu, X. (eds) Enterprise Interoperability III. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-221-0_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-221-0_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-220-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-221-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics