Abstract
The European knowledge-based economy has a complex product to market to the rest of the world. Techniques of the past, based on the closed-world assumption, have proved useful in many types of local information systems. However, theory and practice suggest that this approach may be inadequate for the infrastructure required. In databases the relational model through SQL has maintained wide dominance in business data processing. However, interoperability between different databases, even when based on the relational model, is proving a major problem. Predicate logic (consistent and complete to first-order) has many advantages for practical application. Interoperability however requires higher order logic as the arguments themselves are relations and functions. Higher order logic in the context of set theory behaves less satisfactorily according to Gödel’s theorems as such logic cannot satisfy all three of soundness, completeness and effectiveness. This may be a fundamental reason why interoperability is proving to be so difficult. This paper looks at underlying problems and suggests that they may be avoided by the use of categorial higher order logic. Cartesian categories are complete, consistent and decidable. They can be employed as an engineering technique to construct a general architecture of interoperability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Codd, E F, The Relational Model for Database Management Addison-Wesley (1990).
Date, C J, Gödel, Russell, Codd: A Recursive Golden Crowd http://www.dcs.warwick.ac.uk/~hugh/TTM/goedel.pdf 6pp July 17th (2006).
Date, C J, & Darwen, Hugh, Databases, Types and the Relational Model: The Third Manifesto 3rd ed, Addison Wesley (2006).
Egyedi, T, Experts on Causes of Incompatibility between Standard-Compliant Products, in: Enterprise Interoperability: New Challenges and Approaches Doumeingts, G, Müller, J, Morel, G, & Vallespir, B, (edd) Springer 553–563 (2007).
Euractiv Network, Relaunch of the Lisbon Strategy http://www.euractiv.com/en/innovation/growth-jobs-relaunch-lisbon-strategy/article-131891 (2005).
European Commission, Internal Guidelines in: Integrated Guidelines for Growth and Jobs 2005–2008 2005/0057, http://ec.europa.eu/growthandjobs/pdf/COM2005_141_en.pdf (2005).
Freyd, P, & Scedrov, A, Categories, Allegories, North-Holland (1990).
Girard, Jean-Yves, Une extension de l’interpretation de Gödel, à l’analyse, et son application à l’élimination des coupures dans l’analyse et la théorie des types, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics North-Holland 63–92 (1971).
Gödel, Kurt, Über die Vollständigkeit des Logikkalküls Doctoral Thesis, D1.736 33pp, University of Vienna (1929). Reprinted in Feferman, S, ed. Gödel Collected Works, volume 1 (1986).
Gödel, Kurt, Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme, I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 38 173–198 (1931): translated in Jean van Heijenoort, From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book on Mathematical Logic Harvard 596–616 (1967).
Halpern, Joseph Y, Harper, Robert, Immerman, Neil, Kolaitis, Phokion G, Vardi, Moshe Y, Vianu, Victor, On the unusual effectiveness of logic in computer science Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7(2) 213–236 (2001).
Heather, Michael, Livingstone, David, & Rossiter, Nick, Higher Order Logic and Interoperability in Global Enterprise, AREIN I-ESA 26–30 March 12pp (2007).
Lawvere, F W, Adjointness in Foundations, Dialectica 23 281–296 (1969).
Livingstone, David, Open Database Project, CEIS, Northumbria University, http://computing.unn.ac.uk/openDBproject/ (2007).
Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, 2nd ed, Springer (1998).
Probst, G, Raub, S, & Romhardt, K, Managing Knowledge Building-Blocks for Success Wiley (2000).
Rodrigues, Maria Joao, The Debate Over Europe and the Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs, 2005.10.21, http://www.mariajoaorodrigues.eu/files/The_Debate_over_Europe_and_LS.doc (2005).
Rossiter, Nick, & Heather, Michael, Conditions for Interoperability, 7th ICEIS Florida, USA, 25–28 May 2005, 92–99 (2005).
Rossiter, Nick, Heather, Michael, & Nelson, David, A Natural Basis for Interoperability, in: Enterprise Interoperability: New Challenges and Approaches Doumeingts, G, Müller, J, Morel, G, & Vallespir, B, (edd) Springer 417–426 (2007).
Ziemann, J, Ohren, O, Jae, ∼kel, F-W, Kahl, T, & Knothe, T, Achieving Enterprise Model Interoperability Applying a Common Enterprise Metamodel, in:Enterprise Interoperability: New Challenges and Approaches Doumeingts, G, Müller, J, Morel, G, & Vallespir, B, (edd), Springer p.199–208 (2007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Heather, M., Livingstone, D., Rossiter, N. (2008). Logical Foundations for the Infrastructure of the Information Market. In: Mertins, K., Ruggaber, R., Popplewell, K., Xu, X. (eds) Enterprise Interoperability III. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-221-0_49
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-221-0_49
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-220-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-221-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)