Abstract
The complexity of social dynamics occurring in small group interactions often hinders the performance of teams. The availability of rich multimodal information about what is going on during the meeting makes it possible to explore the possibility of providing various kinds of support to dysfunctional teams, from facilitation to training sessions addressing both the individuals and the group as a whole. A necessary step in this direction is that of automatically capturing and understanding group dynamics. In order to improve the performance of meetings, external interventions by experts such as facilitators and trainers are commonly employed. Facilitators participate in the meetings as external elements of the group, and their role is to help participants maintain a fair and focused behavior as well as to direct and set the pace of the discussion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C. A. Andersen. Theoretical framework for examining peer collaboration in preservice teacher education. In Proceedings of the 2000 Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Akron, OH, Jan. 6-9 2000.
C. Asavathiratham, S. Roy, B. Lesieutre, and G. Verghese. The influence model. IEEE Control Systems Magazine. Special Issue on Complex Systems, 12, 2001.
R. F. Bales. Personality and Interpersonal Behavior. Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1970.
K. D. Benne and P. Sheats. Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 4:41–49, 1948.
D. Boud, R. Keogh, and D.Walker, editors. Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. Kogan Page, London, 1988.
C. Callaway, E. Not, and O. Stock. Report generation for post-visit summaries in museum environments. In O. Stock and M. Zancanaro, editors, PEACH: Intelligent Interfaces for Museum Visits. Springer, New York, 2007.
G. Carli and G. Gretter. A Start-End Point Detection Algorithm for a Real-Time Acoustic Front-End based on DSP32C VME Board. In Proceedings of ICSPAT, Boston, 1992.
P. Chippendale. Towards automatic body language annotation. In 7th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, FG06, pages 487–492, Southampton, UK, Apr. 2006.
J. DiMicco, A. Pandolfo, and W. Bender. Influencing group participation with a shared display. In CSCW04: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 614–623, 2004.
W. Dong, B. Lepri, A. Cappelletti, A. Pentland, F. Pianesi, and M. Zancanaro. Using the influence model to recognize functional roles in meetings. In In Proceedings of International Conference on Multimodal Interaction ICMI2007, Nagoya, Japan, Nov. 2007.
P. Dourish and S. Bly. Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems CHI’92., 1992.
T. Erickson, C. Halverson, W. A. Kellogg, M. Laff, and T. Wolf. Social translucence: designing social infrastructures that make collective activity visible. Commununications of the ACM, 45(4):40–44, 2002.
B. Garrison. The perceived credibility of electronic mail in newspaper newsgathering. In In Proceedings of Communication Technology and Policy Division, Association for Educational in Journalism and Mass Communication Midwinter Conference, Boulder, CO, Mar. 2003.
J. W. Hall and W. H. Watson. The effects of a normative intervention on group decisionmaking performance. In Human Relations, 23(4):299–317, 1970.
M. A. K. Halliday and R. Hasan. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Deakin University Press, 1985.
D. Katz and R. L. Kahn. The Social Psychology of Organizations. JohnWiley, New York, 1978.
D. Maloney-Krichmar and J. J. Preece. The meaning of an online health community in the lives of its members: Roles, relationships and group dynamics social implications of information and communication technology. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Technology and Society ISTAS’02, 2002.
K. R. McKeown. Text Generation: Using Discourse Strategies and Focus Constraints to Generate Natural Language Text. Cambridge University Press, 1985.
F. Pianesi, M. Zancanaro, B. Lepri, and A. Cappelletti. Multimodal annotated corpora of consensus decision making meetings. The Journal of Language Resources and Evaluation, 41(3-4):409–429, December 2007.
F. Pianesi, M. Zancanaro, E. Not, C. Leonardi, V. Falcon, and B. Lepri. Multimodal support to group dynamics. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 12(2), 2008.
A. Salazar. An analysis of the development and evolution of roles in the small group. Small Group Research, 27(4):475–503, 1996.
J. C. Tang. Finding from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34(2):143–160, 1991.
J.Wilson and D. Rosenberg. Rapid prototyping for user interface design. In M. Helander, editor, Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, pages 859–875. New York, 1988.
M. Zancanaro, B. Lepri, and F. Pianesi. Automatic detection of group functional roles in face to face interactions. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Multimodal Interfaces, ICMI-06, 2006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M., Cappelletti, A., Lepri, B., Not, E. (2009). Automatic Relational Reporting to Support Group Dynamics. In: Waibel, A., Stiefelhagen, R. (eds) Computers in the Human Interaction Loop. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-054-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-054-8_21
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-053-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-054-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)