Skip to main content

Automatic Relational Reporting to Support Group Dynamics

  • Chapter
Computers in the Human Interaction Loop

Abstract

The complexity of social dynamics occurring in small group interactions often hinders the performance of teams. The availability of rich multimodal information about what is going on during the meeting makes it possible to explore the possibility of providing various kinds of support to dysfunctional teams, from facilitation to training sessions addressing both the individuals and the group as a whole. A necessary step in this direction is that of automatically capturing and understanding group dynamics. In order to improve the performance of meetings, external interventions by experts such as facilitators and trainers are commonly employed. Facilitators participate in the meetings as external elements of the group, and their role is to help participants maintain a fair and focused behavior as well as to direct and set the pace of the discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. A. Andersen. Theoretical framework for examining peer collaboration in preservice teacher education. In Proceedings of the 2000 Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Akron, OH, Jan. 6-9 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Asavathiratham, S. Roy, B. Lesieutre, and G. Verghese. The influence model. IEEE Control Systems Magazine. Special Issue on Complex Systems, 12, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. F. Bales. Personality and Interpersonal Behavior. Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. D. Benne and P. Sheats. Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 4:41–49, 1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Boud, R. Keogh, and D.Walker, editors. Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. Kogan Page, London, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Callaway, E. Not, and O. Stock. Report generation for post-visit summaries in museum environments. In O. Stock and M. Zancanaro, editors, PEACH: Intelligent Interfaces for Museum Visits. Springer, New York, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Carli and G. Gretter. A Start-End Point Detection Algorithm for a Real-Time Acoustic Front-End based on DSP32C VME Board. In Proceedings of ICSPAT, Boston, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Chippendale. Towards automatic body language annotation. In 7th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, FG06, pages 487–492, Southampton, UK, Apr. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. DiMicco, A. Pandolfo, and W. Bender. Influencing group participation with a shared display. In CSCW04: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 614–623, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Dong, B. Lepri, A. Cappelletti, A. Pentland, F. Pianesi, and M. Zancanaro. Using the influence model to recognize functional roles in meetings. In In Proceedings of International Conference on Multimodal Interaction ICMI2007, Nagoya, Japan, Nov. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Dourish and S. Bly. Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems CHI’92., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Erickson, C. Halverson, W. A. Kellogg, M. Laff, and T. Wolf. Social translucence: designing social infrastructures that make collective activity visible. Commununications of the ACM, 45(4):40–44, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Garrison. The perceived credibility of electronic mail in newspaper newsgathering. In In Proceedings of Communication Technology and Policy Division, Association for Educational in Journalism and Mass Communication Midwinter Conference, Boulder, CO, Mar. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. W. Hall and W. H. Watson. The effects of a normative intervention on group decisionmaking performance. In Human Relations, 23(4):299–317, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. A. K. Halliday and R. Hasan. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Deakin University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Katz and R. L. Kahn. The Social Psychology of Organizations. JohnWiley, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Maloney-Krichmar and J. J. Preece. The meaning of an online health community in the lives of its members: Roles, relationships and group dynamics social implications of information and communication technology. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Technology and Society ISTAS’02, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. R. McKeown. Text Generation: Using Discourse Strategies and Focus Constraints to Generate Natural Language Text. Cambridge University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. Pianesi, M. Zancanaro, B. Lepri, and A. Cappelletti. Multimodal annotated corpora of consensus decision making meetings. The Journal of Language Resources and Evaluation, 41(3-4):409–429, December 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. F. Pianesi, M. Zancanaro, E. Not, C. Leonardi, V. Falcon, and B. Lepri. Multimodal support to group dynamics. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 12(2), 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Salazar. An analysis of the development and evolution of roles in the small group. Small Group Research, 27(4):475–503, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. C. Tang. Finding from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34(2):143–160, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J.Wilson and D. Rosenberg. Rapid prototyping for user interface design. In M. Helander, editor, Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, pages 859–875. New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Zancanaro, B. Lepri, and F. Pianesi. Automatic detection of group functional roles in face to face interactions. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Multimodal Interfaces, ICMI-06, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M., Cappelletti, A., Lepri, B., Not, E. (2009). Automatic Relational Reporting to Support Group Dynamics. In: Waibel, A., Stiefelhagen, R. (eds) Computers in the Human Interaction Loop. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-054-8_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-054-8_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-053-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-054-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics