Abstract
In this chapter we argue for hybrid interaction system to support the formation, operation and evolution of an IVE. The main reason to have people involved is the complexity of the underlying information space, and the variety of procedures one may follow in establishing a VE.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bonabeau, E., Don’t Trust Your Gut, Harvard Business Review, Prod. #: R0305J-PDF-ENG, Vol. 3604, May, 2003.
Business Process Modeling Notation, Version 1.1, http://www.bpmn.org, 2008.
Degani, A., Heymann, M., Formal Verification of Human-Automation Interaction, Human Factors, Vol. 44(1), pp. 28–43, 2002.
Gebauer, J.. Modeling the IT-Infrastructure of Inter-Organizational Processes – Automation vs. Flexibility, Proceedings of the Conference of the International Society for Decision Support Systems (ISDSS), 2007.
Haight, J. M., Kecojevic, V., Automation Vs. Human Intervention: What is the Best Fit for the Best Performance? Process Safety Progress, Vol. 24(1), pp. 45–51, 2005.
Heinl, P., Horn, S., Jablonski, S., Neeb, J., Stein, K., Teschke, M., A Comprehensive Approach to Flexibility in Workflow Management Systems, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration, pp. 79–88, 1999.
Hermann, T., Walter, T., Participatory Design and Cyclic Improvement of Business Processes with Workflow Management Systems, LS06 Informations system und Sicherheit, Information Retrieval, Informatik und Gesellschaft, 1998.
Hoc, J. M., From Human-Machine Interaction to Human-Machine Cooperation, Ergonomics, Vol. 43(7), pp. 833–843, 2000.
Lee, J. D., See, K. A., Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance, Human Factors, Vol. 46(1), pp. 50–80, 2004.
Luo, Z., Knowledge Sharing, Coordinated Exception Handling and Intelligent Problem Solving for Cross-organizational Business Processes, PhD Thesis, Computer Science Department, University of Georgia, 2001.
Mourao, H. R., Antunes, P., Supporting Direct User Interventions in Exception Handling in Workflow Management Systems, Workshop de Sistemas de Informacao Multimedia e Cooperativos, COOP-MEDIA, Portugal, 2003.
Mowshowitz, A., On the Theory of Virtual Organization, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 14(6), pp. 373–384, 1997.
Oppl, S., Stary, C., Towards Human-Centered Design of Diagrammatic Representation Schemes, ACM International Conference Proceedings Series, Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Task Models and Diagrams (TAMODIA), Vol. 127, pp. 55–62, 2005.
Scheer, A. W., ARIS – Business Process Modeling, Springer, New York, 1998.
Skitka, L. J., Mosier, K. L., Burdick, M., Does Automation Bias Decision-Making? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 51, pp. 991–1006, 1999.
Stary, C., Stoiber, S.. Model-Based Electronic Performance Support. In Interactive Systems. Design, Specification, and Verification. LNCS, Vol. 2844, Springer, 2003.
Strong, D. M., Miller, S. M., Exceptions and Exception Handling in Computerized Information Processes, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), Vol. 13(2), pp. 206–233, 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oppl, S., Peherstorfer, P., Stary, C. (2010). The User Perspective. In: Mehandjiev, N., Grefen, P. (eds) Dynamic Business Process Formation for Instant Virtual Enterprises. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-691-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-691-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-690-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-691-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)