Skip to main content

Conceptualizing, Designing, and Investigating Locative Media Use in Urban Space

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shared Encounters

Abstract

This chapter investigates the social implications of locative media (LM) use and attempts to outline a theoretical framework that may support the design and implementation of location-based applications. Furthermore, it stresses the significance of physical space and location awareness as important factors that influence both human–computer interaction and computer-mediated communication. The chapter documents part of the theoretical aspect of the research undertaken as part of LOcation-based Communication Urban NETwork (LOCUNET), a project that aims to investigate the way users interact with one another (human–computer–human interaction aspect) and with the location-based system itself (human–computer interaction aspect). A number of relevant theoretical approaches are discussed in an attempt to provide a holistic theoretical background for LM use. Additionally, the actual implementation of the LOCUNET system is described and some of the findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A broad definition of LM also includes systems that utilize digital representations of real spaces (such as city maps) that can be accessed remotely (e.g., over the Internet), and not necessarily via a mobile device.

  2. 2.

    In the words of Thackara (2003), we may be talking of a “post-spectacular city,” where digital technologies are used for meaningful human interaction.

  3. 3.

    Agency is a sociological concept that underlies user actions and activities. Agency involves intentionality and motive, as well as content (information) and a consciousness of the above. Both user experience and interaction are about agency (Berger and Luckmann 1966; Giddens 1984; Bourdieu 1990).

  4. 4.

    The distinction between an “emic” and an “etic” level of analysis in the social sciences originates from linguistics and is analogous to the distinction between a “phonemic” and a “phonetic” approach to language (Pike 1967). According to linguistic and anthropologist Kenneth Pike, who invented the terms, there are two ways to approach a cultural or social system, as there are two ways to approach the phonemic system of language. We can either choose to see the object of our research “from within” (an emic approach), or “from outside” (an etic approach). The “emic” approach focuses on the meanings and understandings of the members that make up a given social group, whereas the “etic” approach is based on the use of concepts and categories that come from outside the group and which are meaningful to the scientists or observers. Although there has been much debate on which one of the two levels is the most appropriate for the study of social groups, in fact the “emic” and the “etic” approaches are neither antithetical nor mutually exclusive; in practice, they are proven to be complementary, since social research usually applies both emit and etic methods and interpretations in order to analyze social phenomena.

  5. 5.

    For instance, users who belong to the Team A cannot access Object no. five unless a user who belongs to the same team has accessed info-pack No. 2 OR the team has already captured three objects.

References

  • Argyle M (1998) Bodily communication. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Augé M (1992) Non places: introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Baym N (2006) Interpersonal life online. In: Lievrouw LA & Livingstone S (eds). The handbook of new media (Updated Student Edition), 35–54. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford S, Flintham M, Drodz A, Tandavanitj N, Adams M & Farr JR (2006) The design and experience of the location-based performance uncle roy all around you. Leonardo Electronic Almanac 14.03 2006, http://leoalmanac.org/journal/Vol_14/lea_v14_n03-04/roy.asp. Retrieved 7 June 2008

  • Berger PL & Luckmann T (1966) The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Biocca F & Delaney B (1995) Immersive virtual reality technology. In: Biocca F & Levy, MR (eds). Communication in the age of virtual reality, 57–124. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden D & Molotch H (2004) Cyberspace meets the compulsion of proximity. In: Graham, S (ed). The cybercities reader, 101–105. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1990) The Logic of Practice, Polity Press: Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1972) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs A & Burke P (2005) A social history of the media: from gutenberg to the internet. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke JSUS (1996) A “Quick and Dirty” usability scale. In Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA & McClelland AL (eds), Usability evaluation in industry. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau M (1984) The practice of everyday life. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Charitos D (2006) Spatialising the internet: new types of hybrid mobile communication environments and their impact on spatial design within the urban context. In: Bourdakis, V & Charitos D (eds) Communicating space(s): Proceedings of the 24th eCAADe Conference, 160-167. University of Thessaly, Volos

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamantaki K, Charitos D, Tsianos N, Lekkas Z (2007) Towards investigating the social dimensions of using LM within the urban context. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IET International Conference on Intelligent Environments, pp. 53–60. Ulm, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish P (2001) Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. The MIT Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew T (2005) New media: an introduction (2nd edition). Oxford University Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay G & Hembrooke H (2004) Activity-centered design: an ecological approach to designing smart tools and usable systems. The MIT Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E (1967) Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face behavior. Doubleday and Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E (1990) The presentation of self in everyday life. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham S (ed) (2004) The cybercities reader. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Green N (2006) On the move: technology, mobility, and the mediation of social time and space. In: Hassan R and Thomas J (eds). The new media theory reader, 249–265. Open University Press, Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemment D (2005) The mobile effect. Convergence 11 (2): 32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine C (2000) Virtual ethnographer. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptelinin V & Nardi B (2006) Acting with technology: activity theory and interaction design. The MIT Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler S, Siegel J, McGuire TW (1984) “Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication”, American Psychologist, 39(10): 1123–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Law J (1992) Notes on the Theory of the Actor Network: Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Law-Notes-on-ANT.pdf

  • Lievrouw LA & Livingstone S (2002). Introduction to the First Edition. In: Lievrouw LA & Livingstone S (eds). The handbook of new media (Updated Student Edition), 15–32. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough M (2004) Digital ground: architecture, pervasive computing and environmental nnowing. The MIT Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike K (1967) Language in relation to a unified theory of structure of human behavior (2nd edition), Mouton, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold H (2002) Smart mobs: the next social revolution – transforming cultures and communities in the age of instant access. Basic Books, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizopoulos C (2007) An activity-based perspective of interacting with ambient intelligence systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IET International Conference on Intelligent Environments, 81–88. Ulm, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel G (1971) Metropolis and the mental life. In: Levine D (ed). Georg Simmel: on individuality and social forms (Selected Writings), 321–340. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza e Silva A (2003) Mobile networks and public spaces: bringing multi-user environments into the physical space. In: Ascott R (ed). Electronic proceedings of the 2003 consciousness reframed international conference. CaiiA STAR, University of Wales College, Newport

    Google Scholar 

  • Thackara J (2003) “The post-spectacular city”, lecture at Creativity and the City Conference, Amsterdam, 25 September 2003. http://www.doorsofperception.com/archives/2003/09/the_postspectac_1.php. Retrieved 17 September 2007

  • Thompson JB (1995) The media and modernity: a social theory of the media. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle S (1996) Life on the screen: identity in the age of the internet. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuters M (2004) The locative commons: situating location-based media in urban public space. In: Electronic Proceedings of the 2004 Futuresonic Conference, Manchester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiser M (1991) The computer for the twenty-first century. Scientific American 265 (3): 94–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research project titled “LOCUNET” is supported by the Greek General Secretariat of Research and Technology under the framework of the Operational Program PEP Attikis, Measure 1.2. The Program is co-financed (70%) by the European Fund of Regional Development (EFRD), which aims to facilitate the reduction of the inequalities within the European Union regions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katerina Diamantaki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Diamantaki, K., Rizopoulos, C., Charitos, D., Kaimakamis, N. (2009). Conceptualizing, Designing, and Investigating Locative Media Use in Urban Space. In: Willis, K., Roussos, G., Chorianopoulos, K., Struppek, M. (eds) Shared Encounters. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-727-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-727-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-726-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-727-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics