Skip to main content

Science, Technology, and Reality in The Matrix Online and Tabula Rasa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Online Worlds: Convergence of the Real and the Virtual

Part of the book series: Human-Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

All virtual worlds possess implicit theories of the nature of reality and of the central values of human life, but the The Matrix Online (MxO) and Tabula Rasa (TR) are notable for having especially well-developed philosophical motivations. Extensive participant-observation research in both revealed that they postulate hidden realities beneath the world of appearances, shared a concern over whether technology would liberate or enslave humanity, and offered players distinctive programming languages with which they could empower themselves. Avatars in both were protean, in different ways capable of evolving along multiple lines of development, and operating secondary avatars that provide challenging metaphors of the ways humans exploit each other. MxO draws heavily upon European theories of the social construction of reality and false consciousness, whereas TR draws upon the ideology of the spaceflight social movement and went so far as to transport the avatars to the International Space Station orbiting the real world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bainbridge, W. S. (1976). The spaceflight revolution. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S. (2008). Computational affective sociology. In Affect and emotion in HCI, edited by C. Peter & R. Beale. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capek, K. (1923). R. U. R. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Page & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1893). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1893). “Letter to Franz Mehring.” Retrieved September 15, 2008 (http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1893/letters/93_07_14.htm).

  • Ferrara, L. (1996). “Schopenhauer on music as the embodiment of will” pp. 183-199 in Schopenhauer, philosophy, and the arts, edited by D. Jacquette. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, H. (1888). Schopenhauer’s metaphysics of music. New Englander and Yale Review, 48, 362-368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriott, R. (British, General) (Ed.) (2007). Welcome to the AFS: Allied free sentients official field manual. Austin, TX: Destination Games.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, W. (ed). (2002). The matrix and philosophy: Welcome to the desert of the real. Chicago, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, M. (2004). Like a splinter in your mind: The philosophy behind the matrix trilogy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1970). The raw and the cooked. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R. J. (1971). Protean man. Archives of general psychiatry, 24, 298-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia: An introduction to the sociology of knowledge. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, C. (2005). The matrix online: Prima official game guide. Roseville, CA: Prima Games.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. W. (1918). The genealogy of morals. New York: Boni and Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. & Shils, E. A. (eds). (1951). Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. (1997). Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajlich, V. (2004). Software cultures. pp. 659-663 in Berkshire encyclopedia of human-computer interaction, edited by W.S. Bainbridge, Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopenhauer, A. (1883-1886). The world as will and idea. London: Trübner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrasher, F. (1927). The Gang. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C., Storr, J., & Reich, P. A. (1992). Blissymbol reference guide. Toronto, Canada: Blissymbolics communication international.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeffeth, G. (ed). (2003). Taking the red pill: Science, philosophy and religion in the matrix. Dallas, TX: BenBella Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bainbridge, W.S. (2010). Science, Technology, and Reality in The Matrix Online and Tabula Rasa . In: Bainbridge, W. (eds) Online Worlds: Convergence of the Real and the Virtual. Human-Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-825-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-825-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-824-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-825-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics