Abstract
Under some applications, identity-authentication must be involved into block-chain systems. However, the introduction of traditional PKI mechanism in block-chain systems is not proper for 3 reasons: (1) a centralized certification authority (CA) represents a single point of failure in the network; (2) the numbers and locations of nodes vary in time; (3) it introduces additional centralized factors in the block-chain system that is already decentralized. For the sake of decentralization multi-CA scenario is considered to distribute CA-functionality to nodes. Further, armed with secret sharing scheme, a practical distributed CA-based PKI scheme is proposed that is well-associated with existed mechanisms (such as POW) in the original system. Finally, solutions of verification and multi-level assigning issues are constructed via verifiable secret sharing and multilevel secret sharing tools.
This work was supported by the Shenzhen Municipal Development and Reform Commission (Disciplinary Development Program for Data Science and Intelligent Computing) and Shenzhen Key Lab of Information Theory & Future Network Arch (ZDSYS201603311739428).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blakley, G.R.: Safeguarding cryptographic keys, p. 313. IEEE Computer Society (1979)
Asmuth, C., Bloom, J.: A modular approach to key safeguarding. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 29(2), 208–210 (1983)
Karnin, E., Greene, J., Hellman, M.: On secret sharing systems. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory IT 29(1), 35–41 (1983)
Shamir, A.: How to share a secret. Commun. ACM 22(11), 612–613 (1979)
Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Consulted (2008)
Chor, B., Goldwasser, S.: Verifiable secret sharing and achieving simultaneity in the presence of faults. In: Proceedings of 26th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 383–395. IEEE, New York (1985)
Feldman, P.: A practical scheme for non-interactive verifiable secret sharing. In: Proceedings of 28th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 427–438. IEEE, New York (1987)
Pedersen, T.P.: Non-interactive and information-theoretic secure verifiable secret sharing. In: Feigenbaum, J. (ed.) CRYPTO 1991. LNCS, vol. 576, pp. 129–140. Springer, Heidelberg (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46766-1_9
Ben-or, M., Goldwasser, S., Widgerson, A.: Completeness theorems for noncryptographic fault-tolerant distributed computation. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 1–10. ACM, New York (1988)
Stadler, M.: Publicly verifiable secret sharing. In: Maurer, U. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1996. LNCS, vol. 1070, pp. 190–199. Springer, Heidelberg (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68339-9_17
Gennaro, R., Jarecki, S., Krawczyk, H., Rabin, T.: Secure distributed key generation for discrete-log based cryptosystems. In: Stern, J. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1592, pp. 295–310. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48910-X_21
Pedersen, T.P.: A threshold cryptosystem without a trusted party. In: Davies, D.W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1991. LNCS, vol. 547, pp. 522–526. Springer, Heidelberg (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46416-6_47
Desmedt, Y., Frankel, Y.: Shared generation of authenticators and signatures. In: Feigenbaum, J. (ed.) CRYPTO 1991. LNCS, vol. 576, pp. 457–469. Springer, Heidelberg (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46766-1_37
Santis, A.D., Desmedt, Y., Frankei, Y., Yung, M.: How to share a function securely. In: Twenty-Sixth ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 522–533. IEEE, New York (1994)
Frankei, Y., Gemmei, P., Yung, M.: Witness-based cryptographic program checking and robust function sharing. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 499–508. ACM, New York (1996)
Shoup, V.: Practical threshold signatures. In: Preneel, B. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2000. LNCS, vol. 1807, pp. 207–220. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45539-6_15
Iftene, S.: General secret sharing based on the Chinese remainder theorem with applications in E-voting. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 186, 67–84 (2007)
Iftene, S., Boureanu, I.: Weighted threshold secret sharing based on the Chinese remainder theorem. Sci. Ann. Cuza Univ. 15, 161–172 (2005)
Simmons, G.J.: How to (Really) share a secret. In: Goldwasser, S. (ed.) CRYPTO 1988. LNCS, vol. 403, pp. 390–448. Springer, New York (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34799-2_30
Brickell, E.F.: Some ideal secret sharing schemes. J. Comb. Math. Comb. Comput. 434, 468–475 (1990)
Pedersen, T.P.: Distributed provers with applications to undeniable signatures. In: Davies, D.W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1991. LNCS, vol. 547, pp. 221–242. Springer, Heidelberg (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46416-6_20
Zouridaki, C., Mark, B.L., Gaj, K., Thomas, R.K.: Distributed CA-based PKI for mobile ad hoc networks using elliptic curve cryptography. In: Katsikas, S.K., Gritzalis, S., López, J. (eds.) EuroPKI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3093, pp. 232–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25980-0_19
Rabin, T., Ben-Or, M.: Verifiable secret sharing and multiparty protocols with honest majority. In: ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 73–85. DBLP (1989)
Grinberg, R.: Bitcoin: An Innovative Alternative Digital Currency. Social Science Electronic Publishing (2011)
Cuthbertson, A.: Bitcoin Now Accepted by 100,000 Merchants Worldwide. International Business Times, IBTimes Co. (2015)
Hileman, D.G., Rauchs, M.: 2017 Global Cryptocurrency Benchmarking Study. Social Science Electronic Publishing, Cambridge (2017)
Antonopoulos, A.M.: Mastering Bitcoin: Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2014)
Swan, M.: Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2015)
Technical report by the UK government chief scientific adviser. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/distributed-ledger-technology-beyond-block-chain. Accessed 10 May 2018
Ethereum White Paper: a next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/WhitePaper. Accessed 10 May 2018
Brito, J., Shadab, H., Castillo, A.: Bitcoin financial regulation: securities, derivatives, prediction markets, and gambling. Columbia Sci. Technol. Law Rev. 16, 146–221 (2014)
Eyal, I., Efe Gencer, A., Sirer, E.G., van Renesse, R.: Bitcoin-NG: a scalable blockchain protocol. Cryptography and Security. arXiv:1510.02037 (2015)
Courtois, N.T., Bahack, L.: On subversive miner strategies and block withholding attack in bitcoin digital currency. Cryptography and Security. arXiv:1402.1718 (2014)
Hardjono, T., Smith, N., Alex: http://connection.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2014/12/Anonymous-Identities-for-Permissioned-Blockchains2.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2018
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fu, Y., Du, R., Li, D. (2018). Distribution of CA-Role in Block-Chain Systems. In: Sun, X., Pan, Z., Bertino, E. (eds) Cloud Computing and Security. ICCCS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11067. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00018-9_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00018-9_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00017-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00018-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)