Skip to main content

Ontology Modeling for Criminal Law

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems (AICOL 2015, AICOL 2016, AICOL 2016, AICOL 2017, AICOL 2017)

Abstract

In the continental law system, more attention is paid to judicial interpretation to judge legal facts or actions than judicial precedents. Therefore, in the continental legal system, it is appropriate to express the law itself with knowledge such as legal ontologies or logical rules. To construct legal ontologies and rule-based methods, legal analysis by collaboration between legal experts and knowledge engineers should be preceded. This paper proposes a general model for designing criminal law ontologies and rules. First, we introduce the super-domain ontology that contains the common characteristics of criminal law. Then, we explain the rule design method of criminal law and present the application of the anti-graft act in Korea as an example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/56906_en.html.

  2. 2.

    https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-primer-20121211/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/.

  4. 4.

    http://www.estrellaproject.org/.

  5. 5.

    Pandekten-system begins with the general principles, followed by separate provisions governing particular areas of law.

  6. 6.

    http://elaw.klri.re.kr/kor_service/lawView.do?hseq=39287&lang=ENG.

  7. 7.

    http://www.oecd.org/corruption/oecdantibriberyconvention.htm.

  8. 8.

    KRW is the Korean currency.

  9. 9.

    http://elaw.klri.re.kr/kor_service/lawView.do?hseq=38891&lang=ENG.

References

  1. Benjamins, V.Richard, Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A.: Law and the semantic web, an introduction. In: Benjamins, V.Richard, Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Aguiló-Regla, J.: Introduction: legal informatics and the conceptions of the law. In: Benjamins, V.Richard, Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369, pp. 18–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Breuker, J.: The construction and use of ontologies of criminal law in the eCourt European project. In: Proceedings of Means of Electronic Communication in Court Administration, pp. 15–40 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bezzazi, E.-H.: Building an ontology that helps identify criminal law articles that apply to a cybercrime case. In: ICSOFT (PL/DPS/KE/MUSE), pp. 179–185. INSTICC Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bak, J., Jedrzejek, C.: Application of an ontology-based model to a selected fraudulent disbursement economic crime. In: Casanovas, P., Pagallo, U., Sartor, G., Ajani, G. (eds.) AICOL -2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6237, pp. 113–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16524-5_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Gordon, T.F.: Constructing legal arguments with rules in the legal knowledge interchange format (LKIF). In: Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Casellas, N., Rubino, R. (eds.) Computable Models of the Law. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4884, pp. 162–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Contissa, G.: Rulebase Technology and Legal Knowledge Representation. In: Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Casellas, N., Rubino, R. (eds.) Computable Models of the Law. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4884, pp. 254–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Governatori, G., Hashmi, M., Lam, H.-P., Villata, S., Palmirani, M.: Semantic business process regulatory compliance checking using LegalRuleML. In: Blomqvist, E., Ciancarini, P., Poggi, F., Vitali, F. (eds.) EKAW 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10024, pp. 746–761. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49004-5_48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Biagioli, C., Francesconi, E., Passerini, A., Montemagni, S., Soria, C.: Automatic semantics extraction in law documents. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 133–140. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Soria, C., Bartolini, R., Lenci, A., Montemagni, S., Pirrelli, V.: Automatic extraction of semantics in law documents. In: Proceedings of the V Legislative XML Workshop, pp. 253–266 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dragoni, M., Governatori, G., Villata, S.: Automated rules generation from natural language legal texts. In: Workshop on Automated Detection, Extraction and Analysis of Semantic Information in Legal Texts, San Diego, USA, pp. 1–6 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dragoni, M., Villata, S., Rizzi, W., Governatori, G.: Combining NLP approaches for rule extraction from legal documents. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on ‘MIning and REasoning with Legal texts’ collocated at the 29th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saias, J., Quaresma, P.: A methodology to create legal ontologies in a logic programming information retrieval system. In: Benjamins, V.R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369, pp. 185–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Lenci, A., Montemagni, S., Pirrelli, V., Venturi, G.: NLP-based ontology learning from legal texts. a case study. In: LOAIT, pp. 113–129. CEUR-WS.org (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Völker, J., Fernandez Langa, S., Sure, Y.: Supporting the construction of Spanish legal ontologies with Text2Onto. In: Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Casellas, N., Rubino, R. (eds.) Computable Models of the Law. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4884, pp. 105–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Saias, J., Quaresma, P.: Using NLP techniques to create legal ontologies in a logic programming based web information retrieval system (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hoekstra, R., Breuker, J., Di Bello, M., Boer, A., et al.: The LKIF core ontology of basic legal concepts. In: LOAIT, pp. 43–63 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Yik Rhim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Soh, C., Lim, S., Hong, K., Rhim, YY. (2018). Ontology Modeling for Criminal Law. In: Pagallo, U., Palmirani, M., Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Villata, S. (eds) AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. AICOL AICOL AICOL AICOL AICOL 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10791. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00178-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00178-0_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00177-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00178-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics