Abstract
This paper describes an exploration process aligned with the core domain of Service Science inside a critical sector of Society, aiming at developing City in a sustainable, responsible, inclusive way. The paper focuses on defining the Public Safety as a Service concept in an inclusive and responsible value co-creation urban design vision for liveable cities. It explains how service intelligence can act on immaterial artefacts to transform data into information to generate value co-creation processes whose outcomes are applied to the evolution of knowledge in public safety services. Public safety is approached within a service ecosystem perspective, following the global targets of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction as an application perspective. Managerial implication are approached from two perspectives: establishment of governance principles with the help of Elinor Ostrom’s works, and a Viable Systems Approach on the response to disasters operating rules.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
UN: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, ST/ESA/SER.A/366 (2015)
IBM: Making Sense of a Sensored World. IBM Smarter Planet. https://www.ibm.com/
Cisco: Smart+connected Communities. Changing a City, a Country, the World. Cisco White paper. https://www.cisco.com/
Siemens: Siemens City Cockpit White paper. City Cockpit in Singapore: Collective Intelligence - Real Time Government. Siemens. https://www.siemens.com/
Microsoft: Microsoft Citynext White paper. Accelerating the Digital Transformation of Smart Cities and Smart Communities. Microsoft. https://enterprise.microsoft.com/
Greenfield, A.: Against the Smart City (the City is Here for You to Use, Part i). Amazon Digital Services LLC, Kindle edn, Do Projects, 1.3 edn (2013)
UrbanScale: Design for Networked Cities and Citizens. UrbanScale. http://urbanscale.org/
LiveableCities: Transforming the Engineering of Cities for Global and Societal Wellbeing. Liveable Cities. http://liveablecities.org.uk/
UN: Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. Goal 11: Make Cities Inclusive, Safe, Resilient and Sustainable. United Nations (2017). http://www.un.org/
Ng, I.C., Wakenshaw, S.Y.: The internet-of-things: review and research directions. Int. J. Res. Mark. 34(1), 3–21 (2017)
Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M.: Internet of things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(7), 1645–1660 (2013)
Sundmaeker, H., Guillemin, P., Friess, P., Woelfflé, S.: Vision and challenges for realising the Internet of Things. Clust. Eur. Res. Proj. Internet Things Eur. Comm. 3(3), 34–36 (2010)
Soriano, J., et al.: Internet of services. In: Bertin, E., Crespi, N., Magedanz, T. (eds.) Evolution of Telecommunication Services. LNCS, vol. 7768, pp. 283–325. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41569-2_14
Moßgraber, J., et al.: The sensor to decision chain in crisis management. In: Boersma, K., Tomaszewski, B. (eds.) CoRe Paper - Universal Design of ICT in Emergency Management, Proceedings of the 15th ISCRAM Conference - Rochester, NY, USA, May 2018 (2018)
Mims, C.: The Internet of Things isn’t things, it’s services. Wall Str. J. (2016). https://www.wsj.com/
Estevez, P.A.: CIS in the next decade. IEEE Comput. Intell. Soc. (2016). http://cis.ieee.org/
Leather, A.: Internet of Things in public safety. Frost & Sullivan Webcasts (2015). https://ww2.frost.com/
Sims, K.: Top public safety and security tech trends for 2017. Hexagon Safety & Infrastructure (2017). www.hexagonsafetyinfrastructure.com/
Tiburon: PSaaS: The Next Evolution of Public Safety and Security is Here. Tiburon. http://www.gradicom.com/
Concepts To Operations: Public Safety as a Service (PSaaS). Concepts to Operations. http://www.concepts2ops.com/psaas/
The Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda - Transition Towards Sustainable and Liveable Urban Futures. JPI Urban Europe (2015). http://jpi-urbaneurope.eu/
Lim, C., Kim, M.J., Kim, K.H., Kim, K.J., Maglio, P.P.: Using data to advance service: managerial issues and theoretical implications from action research. J. Serv. Theory Pract. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-08-2016-0141
Spohrer, J.C., Kwan, S.K., Demirkan, H.: Service science: on reflection. In: Cinquini, L., Minin, A.D., Varaldo, R. (eds.) New Business Models and Value Creation: A Service Science Perspective, pp. 7–24. Springer, Milano (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2838-8_2
Macbeth, S., Pitt, J.V.: Self-organising management of user-generated data and knowledge. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 30(3), 237–264 (2015)
Osborne, S.P., Radnor, Z., Strokosch, K.: Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment? Publ. Manag. Rev. 18(5), 639–653 (2016)
Tokoro, N.: The Smart City and the Co-creation of Value: A Source of New Competitiveness in a Low-Carbon Society. Springer, Tokyo (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55846-0
Magno, F., Cassia, F.: Public administrators’ engagement in services co-creation: factors that foster and hinder organisational learning about citizens. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 26(11–12), 1161–1172 (2015)
Rytilahti, P., Miettinen, S., Vuontisjärvi, H.-R.: The theoretical landscape of service design. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2015. LNCS, vol. 9186, pp. 86–97. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20886-2_9
UN: Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. In: United Nations, Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction, Sendai, Japan, 18–20 March 2015
UNISDR: UNISDR annual report 2016. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR) (2017). https://www.unisdr.org/
UN: Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA) 2005–2015. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2005). https://www.unisdr.org/we/coordinate/hfa
UN: Chart of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. United Nations (2015). https://www.unisdr.org/
Norris, A., Gonzalez, J., Martinez, S., Parry, D.: Disaster e-Health framework for community resilience. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2018, Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 35–44 (2018)
Grasso, N., Lingua, A.M., Musci, M.A., Noardo, F., Piras, M.: An INSPIRE-compliant open-source GIS for fire-fighting management. Nat. Hazards 90(2), 623–637 (2018)
Navas, S.R., Miyazaki, K.: Exploring “Big Data” applications for disaster management: a scientific keyword word co-occurrence network analysis. JAIST Repository, Japan Society for Research Policy and Innovation Management (2016). https://dspace.jaist.ac.jp/
Heikkurinen, M., Schiffers, M., Kranzlmüller, D.: Environmental computing 1.0: the dawn of a concept. In: International Symposium on Grids and Clouds (ISGC) 2015, PoS(ISGC2015)030. Academia Sinica, Taipei (2015)
Grasso, V., Singh, A., Pathak, J.: Early warning systems: state-of-art analysis and future directions. In: United Nations Environment Programme, Division of Early Warning and Assessment (2012). http://www.unep.org
Roles of local government - Public Safety. Michigan Townships Association. https://www.michigantownships.org/publicsafety.asp
Berrahal, S., Boudriga, N., Bagula, A.: Cooperative sensor-clouds for public safety services in infrastructure-less areas. In: 2016 22nd Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APCC), pp. 222–229. IEEE (2016)
Raza, A.: LTE network strategy for smart city public safety. In: IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Innovative Business Practices for the Transformation of Societies (EmergiTech), pp. 34–37. IEEE (2016)
Manzalini, A., Crespi, N.: An edge operating system enabling anything-as-a-service. IEEE Commun. Mag. 54(3), 62–67 (2016)
Safety as a Service. http://www.safetyasaservice.com
UN: Americas to Agree on Sendai Framework Action Plan. United Nations (2017). https://www.unisdr.org/archive/52207
Public Safety Canada. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/
UN: National framework in order to reduce earthquakes by multi-stakeholder participation in Turkey: National earthquake strategy and action plan of Turkey (UDSEP-2023). United Nations (2013). https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/50178
Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 44(1), 5–23 (2016)
Rafati, L.: Capability-actor-resource-service: a conceptual modelling approach for value-driven strategic sourcing. Ph.D. thesis, Ghent University, Belgium (2018)
Pels, J., Barile, S., Saviano, M., Polese, F., Carrubbo, L.: The contribution of VSA and SDL perspectives to strategic thinking in emerging economies. Manag. Serv. Qual. 24(6), 565–591 (2014)
Vargo, S.L., Akaka, M.A.: Value cocreation and service systems (re)formation: a service ecosystems view. Serv. Sci. 4(3), 207–217 (2012)
Lim, C., Kim, K.H., Kim, M.J., Heo, J.Y., Kim, K.J., Maglio, P.P.: From data to value: a nine-factor framework for data-based value creation in information-intensive services. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 39, 121–135 (2018)
Lim, C.H., Kim, K.J.: Information service blueprint: a service blueprinting framework for information-intensive services. Serv. Sci. 6(4), 296–312 (2014)
Akaka, M.A., Vargo, S.L.: Technology as an operant resource in service (eco)systems. Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manag. 12(3), 367–384 (2014)
Vargo, S.L., Akaka, M.A., Vaughan, C.M.: Conceptualizing value: a service-ecosystem view. J. Creat. Value 3(2), 117–124 (2017)
Toots, M., et al.: A framework for data-driven public service co-production. In: Janssen, M., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2017. LNCS, vol. 10428, pp. 264–275. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64677-0_22
Johnson, S.P., Menor, L.J., Roth, A.V., Chase, R.B.: A critical evaluation of the new service development process: integrating innovation and service design. In: Fitzsimmons, J.A., Fitzsimmons, M.J. (eds.) New Service Development: Creating Memorable Experiences, pp. 1–32. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks (2000)
Clayton, R.J., Backhouse, C.J., Dani, S.: Evaluating existing approaches to product-service system design: a comparison with industrial practice. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 23(3), 272–298 (2012)
Drǎgoicea, M., Salehpour, S., Nóvoa, H., Oltean, V.E.: Towards a proposal for the sustainability through institutions in public transport services in times of emergency. In: Za, S., Drăgoicea, M., Cavallari, M. (eds.) IESS 2017. LNBIP, vol. 279, pp. 355–369. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56925-3_28
Liew, A.: DIKIW: data, information, knowledge, intelligence, wisdom and their interrelationships. Bus. Manag. Dyn. 2(10), 49–62 (2013)
Baškarada, S., Koronios, A.: Data, information, knowledge, wisdom (DIKW): a semiotic theoretical and empirical exploration of the hierarchy and its quality dimension. Aust. J. Inf. Syst., [S.l.] 18(1) (2013). https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v18i1.748. ISSN 1449-8618
Mattsson, L.G., Jenelius, E.: Vulnerability and resilience of transport systems-a discussion of recent research. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 81, 16–34 (2015)
Bitner, M.J., Zeithaml, V.A., Gremler, D.D.: Technology’s impact on the gaps model of service quality. In: Maglio, P., Kieliszewski, C., Spohrer, J. (eds.) Handbook of service science, pp. 197–218. Springer, Boston (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1628-0_10
Arthur, W.B.: The Nature of Technology: What it is and How it Evolves. Simon and Schuster, New York City (2009)
Ostrom, E.: Design principles and threats to sustainable organizations that manage commons. In: Paper for Electronic Conference on Small Farmer’s Economic Organizations, Organized by Julio A. Berdegue. Santiago, Chile, March 1999
Barile, S., Polese, F.: Linking the viable system and many-to-many network approaches to service-dominant logic and service science. Int. J. Qual. Serv. Sci. 2(1), 23–42 (2010)
Spohrer, J., Golinelli, G.M., Piciocchi, P., Bassano, C.: An integrated SS-VSA analysis of changing job roles. Serv. Sci. 2(1–2), 1–20 (2010)
Barile, S., Polese, F.: Smart service systems and viable service systems: applying systems theory to service science. Serv. Sci. 2(1–2), 21–40 (2010)
Polese, F., Tommasetti, A., Vesci, M., Carrubbo, L., Troisi, O.: Decision-making in smart service systems: a viable systems approach contribution to service science advances. In: Borangiu, T., Drăgoicea, M., Nóvoa, H. (eds.) IESS 2016. LNBIP, vol. 247, pp. 3–14. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32689-4_1
Badinelli, R., Barile, S., Ng, I., Polese, F., Saviano, M., Di Nauta, P.: Viable service systems and decision making in service management. J. Serv. Manag. 23(4), 498–526 (2012)
Spohrer, J., Bassano, C., Piciocchi, P., Siddike, M.A.K.: What makes a System Smart? Wise? In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W. (eds.) Advances in The Human Side of Service Engineering. AISC, pp. 23–34. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41947-3_3
Siddike, M.A.K., Iwano, K., Hidaka, K., Kohda, Y., Spohrer, J.: Wisdom service systems: harmonious interactions between people and machine. In: Freund, L.E., Cellary, W. (eds.) AHFE 2017. AISC, vol. 601, pp. 115–127. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60486-2_11
Spohrer, J., Maglio, P.P., Bailey, J., Gruhl, D.: Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer 40(1), 71–77 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Drăgoicea, M., Badr, N.G., Falcão e Cunha, J., Oltean, V.E. (2018). From Data to Service Intelligence: Exploring Public Safety as a Service. In: Satzger, G., Patrício, L., Zaki, M., Kühl, N., Hottum, P. (eds) Exploring Service Science. IESS 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 331. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00713-3_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00713-3_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00712-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00713-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)