Skip to main content

Mining Rules with Constants from Large Scale Knowledge Bases

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Modeling (ER 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11157))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Rules or constraints can be used to clean a knowledge base, or find new facts which should have been included. Recently there are many efforts on automatically mining rules from large scale knowledge bases. However, these rules usually contain no constants. In practice, we often need some detailed rules, for example, rules restricted to a special country or a special profession. One major challenge of appending constants lies in that there are large amount of constants, each of which can generate a new rule. Moreover, we have to choose appropriate granularity in order to trade off between the applicability and precision (or support and confidence in traditional rule mining terminology). In this paper, we propose a Spark based solution to mine rules with constants, a taxonomy based approach to control the granularity, and several techniques to improve the efficiency. We also conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of our solution with comparison with the state of the art works.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Yago3 has more than 10 million facts, and Freebase has about 2.4 billion facts.

  2. 2.

    We will define this in Sect. 2.3.

  3. 3.

    We will explain the two metrics soon.

  4. 4.

    In this paper, without otherwise specified, the default knowledge base is Yago3.

  5. 5.

    For ease of illustration, both Algorithms 2 and 3 are tailored for the second rule type.

  6. 6.

    https://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/departments/databases-and-information-systems/research/yago-naga/yago/.

  7. 7.

    http://wiki.dbpedia.org/develop/datasets.

References

  1. Mahdisoltani, F., Biega, J., Suchanek, F.M.: YAGO3: a knowledge base from multilingual wikipedias. In: Seventh Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, CIDR 2015, Asilomar, CA, USA, 4–7 January 2015, Online Proceedings (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Niu, F., Zhang, C., Ré, C., Shavlik, J.W.: DeepDive: web-scale knowledge-base construction using statistical learning and inference. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Searching and Integrating New Web Data Sources, Istanbul, Turkey, 31 August 2012, pp. 25–28 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shin, J., Wu, S., Wang, F., De Sa, C., Zhang, C., Ré, C.: Incremental knowledge base construction using DeepDive. PVLDB 8, 1310–1321 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, Y., Wang, D.Z., Goldberg, S.: ScaLeKB: scalable learning and inference over large knowledge bases. VLDB J. 25, 893–918 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lao, N., Mitchell, T., Cohen, W.W.: Random walk inference and learning in a large scale knowledge base. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 529–539 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, Y., Wang, D.Z.: Knowledge expansion over probabilistic knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 649–660 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chu, X., Ilyas, I.F., Papotti, P.: Discovering denial constraints. Proc. VLDB Endow. 6, 1498–1509 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Galárraga, L.A., Teflioudi, C., Hose, K., Suchanek, F.: AMIE: association rule mining under incomplete evidence in ontological knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 413–422 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fan, W., Geerts, F., Li, J., Xiong, M.: Discovering conditional functional dependencies. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 23, 683–698 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, Y., Goldberg, S., Wang, D.Z., Johri, S.S.: Ontological pathfinding: mining first-order knowledge from large knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 835–846 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quinlan, J.R.: Learning logical definitions from relations. Mach. Learn. 5, 239–266 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Muggleton, S., De Raedt, L.: Inductive logic programming: theory and methods. J. Log. Program. 19, 629–679 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frnkranz, J., Gamberger, D., Lavrac, N.: Foundations of Rule Learning. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75197-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Savasere, A., Omiecinski, E., Navathe, S.B.: An efficient algorithm for mining association rules in large databases. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 432–444 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Galárraga, L., Teflioudi, C., Hose, K., Suchanek, F.M.: Fast rule mining in ontological knowledge bases with AMIE. VLDB J. 24, 707–730 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Agrawal, R., Srikant, R.: Fast algorithms for mining association rules in large databases. In: VLDB 1994, Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 12–15 September 1994, Santiago de Chile, Chile, pp. 487–499 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zeng, Q., Patel, J.M., Page, D.: QuickFOIL: scalable inductive logic programming. Proc. VLDB Endow. 8, 197–208 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dean, J., Ghemawat, S.: MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Commun. ACM 51, 107–113 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yan, W.P., Larson, P.: Eager aggregation and lazy aggregation. VLDB 31(12), 345–357 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harinarayan, V., Gupta, A.: Generalized projections: a powerful query-optimization technique (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Research & Develop Plan (No. 2016YFB1000702), National Science Foundation of China (No. 61602488), and Talent Training Fund at RUC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinchuan Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, X., Zhang, J., Chen, J., Fan, J. (2018). Mining Rules with Constants from Large Scale Knowledge Bases. In: Trujillo, J., et al. Conceptual Modeling. ER 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11157. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00846-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00847-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics