Skip to main content

Ensure Citizen-Oriented Data for ‘Co-production’ of Public Policy: Russian Case of ‘Budget for Citizens’

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Internet Science (INSCI 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11193))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2867 Accesses

Abstract

Modern budgeting based on cooperation transforms designs of budgetary policy, accountability systems, processes of identifying public values and others. Ensure citizen-oriented data relating to the budget gets particular importance and shared learning of citizens and government for inclusive budget process becomes main requisite for successful collaboration. There is the difference in using ‘co-production’ between democratic and mixed political regimes with statist direction. The paper analyzes the Russian practice of “budget for the citizens” in the mixed (hybrid) regimes, introduced in 2013 at the federal and regional levels. Imitative institutions of “budget for the citizens” inure for legitimating regimes, but also they are good factors for mutual learning for cooperation. Transparency of budgetary data, its transformation for the citizens, and budgeting, initiated by citizens, effects on the character of Russian designs for inclusive budgeting. As shown in the article, citizens-oriented data do not directly influence the participation in budgeting. They are one of the causes in a complex set of influencing conditions. However, they are organically related to the inclusive model of citizen budget implementation. To study this complexity, a configurative method of comparative analysis (QCA) was used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boukhis, I., Ayachi, R., Eloedi, Z., Mellouli, S., Amor, N.B.: Decision model for policy makers in the context of citizens engagement: application on participatory budgeting. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 34(6), 740–756 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bovaird, T., Loffler, E.: From engagement to co-production: how users and communities contribute to public services. In: Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B. (eds.) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-production. Sage, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Budzetnoe Poslanie Presidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii o Budgetnoy Politike v 2014–2016 godah 13 Iyunia 2013 http://kremlin.ru/acts/news/18332. Accessed 20 Apr 2017

  4. Cabannes, Y.: Participatory budgeting: a significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environ. Urban. 16(1), 27–31 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gabrys, J., Pritchard, H., Barratt, B.: Just good enough data: figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. In: Big Data and Society. July–December 1–14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ganuza, E., Frances, F.: The deliberative turn in participation: the problem of inclusion and deliberative opportunities in participatory budgeting. Eur. Polit. Sci. Rev. 4(2), 283–302 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eckerd, A.: Citizen language and administrative response: participation in environmental impact assessment. Adm. Soc. 49(3), 348–373 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714548272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rihoux, B., Grimm, H. (eds.): Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis. Beyond Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28829-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Krenjova, J., Raudla, R.: Policy diffusion at the local level: participatory budgeting in Estonia. Urban Aff. Rev. 3(4), 1–29 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lloyd, E.: Co-producing early years policy in England under the Coalition Government. Manag. Educ. 28(4), 130–137 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Po raschetam Rosstata. d-russia.ru/rosstat-zafiksiroval-perevypolnenie-plana-dostich-v-2016-g-50-dlya-pokazatelya-dolya-grazhdanispolzuyushhih-elektronnye-gosuslugi.html. Accessed 19 Apr 2017

  12. Ragin, Ch.: The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rating po urovniu razvitia informatsionnogo obschestva za 2015 god. http://minsvyaz.ru/ru/events/35027/. Accessed 21 Apr 2017

  14. Rating rossiyskyh regionov po kachestvu szizni-2015. http://riarating.ru/regions_rankings/20160225/630011011.html. Accessed 10 Apr 2017

  15. Rating sub’ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii po urovniu otkrytosty budgetnyh dannyh za 2015. https://www.nifi.ru/ru/rating/2015/rezultaty-rejtinga-2015.html. Accessed 21 Apr 2017

  16. Rios, A.-M., Bastida, F., Benito, B.: Budget transparency and legislative budgetary oversight: an international approach. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 46(5), 546–568 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rocker, A.: Framing Citizen Participation: Participatory Budgeting in France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Sicilia, M., Guarini, E., Sancino, A., Andreani, M., Ruffini, R.: Public services management and co-production in multi-level governance settings. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 82(1), 8–27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314566008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Smorgunov, L.: Requisites for open budgeting: a comparison of the ‘Budget for Citizens’ in Russian regions using QCA. In: Alexandrov, D.A., Boukhanovsky, A.V., Chugunov, A.V., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds.) DTGS 2017. CCIS, vol. 745, pp. 243–256. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69784-0_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Souza, C.: Participatory budgeting in Brazilian cities: limits and possibilities in building democratic institutions. Environ. Urban. 13(1), 159–184 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Eijk, C.: Trui, St.: Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence. Int. Rev. Admin. Sci. 82(1), 28–46 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Walker, P., Shannon, P.: Participatory governance: towards a strategic model. Commun. Dev. J. 46(2), ii63–ii82 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Williams, B., Matheny, A.: Democracy, Dialogue, and Environmental Disputes: The Languages of Social Regulation. Yale University Press, New Haven (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported with a grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant 18-011-00756 A “Study of citizens participation and building digital government”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonid Smorgunov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Smorgunov, L. (2018). Ensure Citizen-Oriented Data for ‘Co-production’ of Public Policy: Russian Case of ‘Budget for Citizens’. In: Bodrunova, S. (eds) Internet Science. INSCI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11193. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01437-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01437-7_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01436-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01437-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics