Abstract
Modern budgeting based on cooperation transforms designs of budgetary policy, accountability systems, processes of identifying public values and others. Ensure citizen-oriented data relating to the budget gets particular importance and shared learning of citizens and government for inclusive budget process becomes main requisite for successful collaboration. There is the difference in using ‘co-production’ between democratic and mixed political regimes with statist direction. The paper analyzes the Russian practice of “budget for the citizens” in the mixed (hybrid) regimes, introduced in 2013 at the federal and regional levels. Imitative institutions of “budget for the citizens” inure for legitimating regimes, but also they are good factors for mutual learning for cooperation. Transparency of budgetary data, its transformation for the citizens, and budgeting, initiated by citizens, effects on the character of Russian designs for inclusive budgeting. As shown in the article, citizens-oriented data do not directly influence the participation in budgeting. They are one of the causes in a complex set of influencing conditions. However, they are organically related to the inclusive model of citizen budget implementation. To study this complexity, a configurative method of comparative analysis (QCA) was used.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boukhis, I., Ayachi, R., Eloedi, Z., Mellouli, S., Amor, N.B.: Decision model for policy makers in the context of citizens engagement: application on participatory budgeting. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 34(6), 740–756 (2015)
Bovaird, T., Loffler, E.: From engagement to co-production: how users and communities contribute to public services. In: Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B. (eds.) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-production. Sage, New York (2012)
Budzetnoe Poslanie Presidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii o Budgetnoy Politike v 2014–2016 godah 13 Iyunia 2013 http://kremlin.ru/acts/news/18332. Accessed 20 Apr 2017
Cabannes, Y.: Participatory budgeting: a significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environ. Urban. 16(1), 27–31 (2004)
Gabrys, J., Pritchard, H., Barratt, B.: Just good enough data: figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. In: Big Data and Society. July–December 1–14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679677
Ganuza, E., Frances, F.: The deliberative turn in participation: the problem of inclusion and deliberative opportunities in participatory budgeting. Eur. Polit. Sci. Rev. 4(2), 283–302 (2012)
Eckerd, A.: Citizen language and administrative response: participation in environmental impact assessment. Adm. Soc. 49(3), 348–373 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714548272
Rihoux, B., Grimm, H. (eds.): Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis. Beyond Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28829-5
Krenjova, J., Raudla, R.: Policy diffusion at the local level: participatory budgeting in Estonia. Urban Aff. Rev. 3(4), 1–29 (2017)
Lloyd, E.: Co-producing early years policy in England under the Coalition Government. Manag. Educ. 28(4), 130–137 (2014)
Po raschetam Rosstata. d-russia.ru/rosstat-zafiksiroval-perevypolnenie-plana-dostich-v-2016-g-50-dlya-pokazatelya-dolya-grazhdanispolzuyushhih-elektronnye-gosuslugi.html. Accessed 19 Apr 2017
Ragin, Ch.: The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley (1987)
Rating po urovniu razvitia informatsionnogo obschestva za 2015 god. http://minsvyaz.ru/ru/events/35027/. Accessed 21 Apr 2017
Rating rossiyskyh regionov po kachestvu szizni-2015. http://riarating.ru/regions_rankings/20160225/630011011.html. Accessed 10 Apr 2017
Rating sub’ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii po urovniu otkrytosty budgetnyh dannyh za 2015. https://www.nifi.ru/ru/rating/2015/rezultaty-rejtinga-2015.html. Accessed 21 Apr 2017
Rios, A.-M., Bastida, F., Benito, B.: Budget transparency and legislative budgetary oversight: an international approach. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 46(5), 546–568 (2014)
Rocker, A.: Framing Citizen Participation: Participatory Budgeting in France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014)
Sicilia, M., Guarini, E., Sancino, A., Andreani, M., Ruffini, R.: Public services management and co-production in multi-level governance settings. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 82(1), 8–27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314566008
Smorgunov, L.: Requisites for open budgeting: a comparison of the ‘Budget for Citizens’ in Russian regions using QCA. In: Alexandrov, D.A., Boukhanovsky, A.V., Chugunov, A.V., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds.) DTGS 2017. CCIS, vol. 745, pp. 243–256. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69784-0_21
Souza, C.: Participatory budgeting in Brazilian cities: limits and possibilities in building democratic institutions. Environ. Urban. 13(1), 159–184 (2001)
Van Eijk, C.: Trui, St.: Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence. Int. Rev. Admin. Sci. 82(1), 28–46 (2016)
Walker, P., Shannon, P.: Participatory governance: towards a strategic model. Commun. Dev. J. 46(2), ii63–ii82 (2011)
Williams, B., Matheny, A.: Democracy, Dialogue, and Environmental Disputes: The Languages of Social Regulation. Yale University Press, New Haven (1995)
Funding
This work was supported with a grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant 18-011-00756 A “Study of citizens participation and building digital government”).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Smorgunov, L. (2018). Ensure Citizen-Oriented Data for ‘Co-production’ of Public Policy: Russian Case of ‘Budget for Citizens’. In: Bodrunova, S. (eds) Internet Science. INSCI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11193. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01437-7_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01437-7_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01436-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01437-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)