Skip to main content

Modularity in Seaport Management: Identification of the Research Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2018)

Abstract

This article presents the idea and the existing status of the theoretical advancement of the modularity concept. In the empirical part, the research results of the non-hierarchical analysis of clusters were applied, adopting the case study method, to showcase seaport modularities that are representative of the designated developmental types. The results confirm the generic diversity of modularity and they may be useful for the purposes of strategic and operational management of ports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Newton, S., Kawabata, Y., Maurer, H., Pearman, A., van Meijeren, J., de Jong G.: Ports and their connections within the TEN-T. Final Report TREN/R1/350-2008 lot 2. European Commission, Directorate-General Mobility and Transport, Brussels (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Simon, H.A.: The architecture of complexity. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 106(6), 467–482 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ethiraj, S.K., Levinthal, D.: Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Manag. Sci. 50(2), 159–173 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Orton, J.D., Weick, K.R.: Loosely coupled systems: a reconceptualization. AMR 15(2), 203–223 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanchez, R., Mahoney, J.T.: Modularity, flexibility and knowledge management in product and organization design. In: Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., Langlois, R. (eds.) Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks, and Organizations, pp. 362–379. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Malden, Oxford, Melbourne (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pil, F.K., Cohen, S.K.: Modularity: Implications for Imitation. Innovation, and Sustained Advantage, AMR 31(4), 995–1011 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baldwin, C.Y.: Where do transactions come from? Modul. Trans. Bound. Firms, ICC 17(1), 155–195 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miraglia, S.: Systems Architectures and Innovation: The Modularity-Integrality Framework. University of Cambridge, Cambridge (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Seol, H., Kim, Ch., Lee, Ch., Park, Y.: Design process modularization: concept and algorithm. CERA 15(2), 175–185 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khoder, H., Verkhova G.V., Akimov, S.V.: Modular technology in design of flexible complex systems. T-Comm 11(9), 86–90 (2017). Кходер Х., Верхова Г.В., Акимов С.В. (2017), Модульная технология проектирования гибких сложных систем. T-Comm: Телекоммуникации и транспорт 11(9), 86–90 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Langlois, R.N.: Modularity in technology and organization. J. Econ. Behav. Org. 49(2002), 19–37 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hillman, A.J., Withers, M.C., Collins, B.J.: Resource dependence theory: a review. JOM 35(6), 1404–1427 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rymaniak, J.: Ship-seaport relations in the modular perspective. In: Nalepka, A., Ujwary-Gil, A. (eds.) Business and non-profit organizations facing increased competitions and growing customers’ demand. Institute of Economics of the Polish Academy of Sciences, N. Sącz- N. Targ (2018, forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Albers, A., Burkardt, N., Sauter, C., Sedchaicharn, K.: A modularization method in the early phase of product development. In: Marjanovic, D., Storga, M., Pavkovic, N., Bojcetic, N. (eds.) The 10th International Design Conference DS 48: Proceedings DESIGN 2008, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 253–260 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoetker, G.: Do modular products lead to modular organizations? SMJ 27(6), 501–518 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rymaniak, J.: The dimensions of seaports management in a static systemic approach: a case study for Poland. In: Schlick, Ch., Trzcieliński, S. (eds.) Advances in Ergonomics of Manufacturing: Managing the Enterprise of the Future. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 490, pp. 621–631. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janusz Rymaniak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rymaniak, J., Nogalski, B. (2019). Modularity in Seaport Management: Identification of the Research Problem. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Taiar, R. (eds) Human Systems Engineering and Design. IHSED 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02053-8_116

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics