Skip to main content

Prototyping a User Interface for a New Sepsis Risk Decision Support System Using Participatory Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2018)

Abstract

Digi-NewB is a system currently being developed to monitor and predict the risk of sepsis in infants within a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) setting. More than 300,000 preterm infants are hospitalized each year in a European care unit. Sepsis diagnosis is complex and therefore usually late, resulting in an increased risk. In this paper, we present on our experience with applying a participatory design based prototyping method to create user interface (UI) concepts for the Digi-Newb system and then testing the prototypes with end-users. Prototype making within the participatory design framework was found to be an effective method to rapidly develop potential design solutions, utilizing the experience of the end-user as a design partner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Qazi, S.A., Stoll, B.J.: Neonatal sepsis: a major global public health challenge. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 28(1 Suppl), S1–S2 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zea-Vera, A., Ochoa, T.J.: Challenges in the diagnosis and management of neonatal sepsis. J. Trop. Pediatr. 61(1), 1–13 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Värri, A., Kallonen, A., Helander, E., Ledesma, A., Pladys, P.: The Digi-NewB project for preterm infant sepsis risk and maturity analysis. Finn. J. Ehealth Ewelfare 10(2–3), 330–333 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Joseph, R.A.: New technology in the NICU: challenges to parents and clinicians. Neonatal Netw. 35(6), 367–374 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Braithwaite, M.: Nurse burnout and stress in the NICU. Adv. Neonatal Care 8(6), 343 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodgers, P., Yee, J.: The Routledge Companion to Design Research. Routledge, Abingdon (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Dow, S.P., Glassco, A., Kass, J., Schwarz, M., Schwartz, D.L., Klemmer, S.R.: Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. ACM Trans. Comput.- Hum. Interact. 17(4), 18:1–18:24 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, pp. 249–256 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. “Parallel & Iterative Design + Competitive Testing = High Usability,” Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/parallel-and-iterative-design/. Accessed 26 Feb 2018

  10. Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign 10(1), 5–14 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Harte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Harte, R. et al. (2019). Prototyping a User Interface for a New Sepsis Risk Decision Support System Using Participatory Design. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Taiar, R. (eds) Human Systems Engineering and Design. IHSED 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02053-8_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics