Abstract
It is difficult to imagine a world without science policy. Ever since Vannevar Bush published his seminal insights on the role of science in society, science policy has become deeply ingrained in public policy. Alongside this, the discipline of scientometrics developed. It started from library and information needs, helping the ever-growing scientific community to access, retrieve and disseminate its ever-increasing output. However, along the way, scientometrics developed into a powerful set of scientifically validated data, indicators and tools. It diffused across many disciplines in the social sciences. Over time, this evolution came to the attention of policymakers. The wealth of data and indicators developed in the field of scientometrics (later extended to informetrics and webometrics) elicited interest in their use for policy purposes. A symbiosis between scientometrics and science policy was born. Using the case of the Flemish Centre for Research & Development Monitoring (ECOOM), we describe and illustrate this coevolution between scientometrics and science policy, its opportunities and its challenges, and its do's and don'ts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
J. de Solla Price: Big Science, Little Science (Columbia Univ. Press, New York 1963)
E. Garfield: Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas, Science 122(3159), 108–111 (1955)
V. Bush: Science, the Endless Frontier. A Report to the President on a Program of Postwar Scienctific Research (National Science Foundation, Washington 1945)
H. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Eds.): Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (Kluwer, Dordrecht 2004)
K. Debackere, W. Glänzel: Using a bibliometric approach to support research policy making: The case of the Flemish BOF-key, Scientometrics 59(2), 253–276 (2004)
W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, B. Thijs, K. Debackere: A new generation of relational charts for comparative assessment of citation impact, Scientometrics 78(1), 165–188 (2009)
W. Glänzel, K. Debackere: On the opportunities and limitations in using bibliometric indicators in a policy relevant context. In: Bibliometric Analysis in Science and Research: Applications, Benefits and Limitations, ed. by R. Ball (Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich 2003) pp. 225–236
A. Pritchard: Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics, J. Doc. 25(4), 348–349 (1969)
V.V. Nalimov, B.M. Mulchenko: Scientometrics (Nauka, Moscow 1969)
G. Sivertsen: Publication-based funding: The Norwegian model. In: Research Assessment in the Humanities Towards Criteria and Procedures, ed. by M. Ochsner, S.E. Hug, H.D. Daniel (Springer, Zürich 2016) pp. 79–90
T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert: Scientometrics Indicators. A 32-Country Comparative Evaluation of Publishing Performance and Citation Impact (World Scientific, Philadelphia 1985)
W. Glänzel, B. Thijs: The influence of author self-citations on bibliometric macro indicators, Scientometrics 59(3), 281–310 (2004)
T. Braun, W. Glänzel: United Germany: The new scientific superpower?, Scientometrics 19(5–6), 513–521 (1990)
H.F. Moed, R.E. de Bruin, N. van Leeuwen: New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicators and first applications, Scientometrics 33, 381–422 (1995)
W. Glänzel: Characteristic scores and scales. A bibliometric analysis of subject characteristics based on long-term citation observation, J. Informetr. 1(1), 92–102 (2007)
W. Glänzel, B. Thijs, K. Debackere: The application of citation-based performance classes to the disciplinary and multidisciplinary assessment in national comparison and institutional research assessment, Scientometrics 101(2), 939–952 (2014)
W. Glänzel, A. Schubert: A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes, Scientometrics 56(3), 357–367 (2003)
W. Glänzel, B. Thijs: Using ‘core documents' for detecting and labelling new emerging topics, Scientometrics (2012), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0591-7
L. Butler: What happens when funding is linked to publication counts? In: Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, ed. by H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Springer, Dordrecht 2004) pp. 389–405
J. Bichteler, E.A. Eaton: The combined use of bibliographic coupling and co-citation for document retrieval, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 31(4), 278–282 (1980)
K.W. Boyack, R. Klavans: Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 61(12), 2389–2404 (2010)
R.R. Braam, H.F. Moed, A.F.J. van Raan: Mapping of science by combined cocitation and word analysis, Part I: Structural aspects, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 42(4), 233–251 (1991)
R.R. Braam, H.F. Moed, A.F.J. van Raan: Mapping of science by combined cocitation and word analysis, Part II: Dynamical aspects, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 42(4), 252–266 (1991)
P. Glenisson, W. Glänzel, F. Janssens, B. de Moor: Combining full text and bibliometric information in mapping scientific disciplines, Inf. Process. Manag. 41(6), 1548–1572 (2005)
K. Jonkers, T. Zacharewicz: Research Performance Based Funding Systems: A Comparative Assessment, JRC Science for Policy Report (European University Association, Brussels 2016)
E. Pruvot, A. Claeys-Kulik, T. Esterman: Designing Strategies for Effective Funding of Universities in Europe, EUA Report (European Union, Brussels 2015)
K. Debackere, M.A. Rappa: Institutional variations in problem choice and persistence among scientists, Res. Policy 23(4), 425–441 (1994)
Y. Gingras: Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses (MIT Press, Cambridge 2016) p. 136
W. Glänzel: Seven myths in bibliometrics. About facts and fiction in quantitative science studies, Collnet J. Scientometr. Inf. Manag. 2(1), 9–17 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Debackere, K., Glänzel, W., Thijs, B. (2019). Scientometrics Shaping Science Policy and vice versa, the ECOOM Case. In: Glänzel, W., Moed, H.F., Schmoch, U., Thelwall, M. (eds) Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02510-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02511-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)